Re: 128 bit version of Netscape 4.73

2000-06-05 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, ktb wrote: > Rick Macdonald wrote: > > > > On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Brad wrote: > > > > > I went ahead and downloaded the 128-bit versions of both Navigator and > > > > How did you download it? Using my current 4.72, I go through the n

Re: 128 bit version of Netscape 4.73

2000-06-05 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Brad wrote: > I went ahead and downloaded the 128-bit versions of both Navigator and How did you download it? Using my current 4.72, I go through the netscape web pages to accept the strong encription but when I click on "I accept" it starts loading the 16MB into the window ra

Re: Realplayer, Lilo suddenly & mysteriously segfaulting (potato, kern 2.2.15) -- SOLVED RP problem

2000-05-28 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 29 May 2000, James Sleeman wrote: > Hi all, > if anyone is interested I found the source of my problem with > realplayer (lilo is still segfaulting though), I had a fish around the > dot files in my home directory and there were two files and a directory > left behind by realplayer, I

Re: Wine

2000-05-26 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 26 May 2000, John Leget wrote: > Does anyone actually have wine working on debian woody. > > For a long time now all ive been able to get it to do is just hog the > CPU with a black window. Eterm showing building font metrics, it never > seems to finish this. Try removing the sharefont o

Re: Potato INSTALL on LAPTOP (NEC Versa 4050H): pcmcia modules unresolved

2000-04-21 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Bruce Sass wrote: > 2.2.11 was just released (last night) and fixes some (all?) of the > modconf related problems. There was also an upload of new pcmcia > packages a day or two ago (check incoming.debian.org if they are not > in the ftp archive yet). I'd give bf-2.2.11 a tr

Re: Potato INSTALL on LAPTOP (NEC Versa 4050H): pcmcia modules unresolved

2000-04-21 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Bruce Sass wrote: > > I couldn't find any work-around so I've just asked on the boot list. I may > > have to load slink, then just upgrade to potato (and build my own 2.2.14 > > kernel). That should work, shouldn't it? It looks like just the boot > > floppies are mismatched, w

Re: Potato INSTALL on LAPTOP (NEC Versa 4050H): pcmcia modules unresolved

2000-04-21 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Bruce Sass wrote: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Rick Macdonald wrote: > > > > > Trying to install potato from scratch on a NEC Versa 4050H (P90MHz), > > depmod reports unresolved symbols for all the pcmcia modules. I have > > zircom and 3com pc

Potato INSTALL on LAPTOP (NEC Versa 4050H): pcmcia modules unresolved

2000-04-20 Thread Rick Macdonald
Trying to install potato from scratch on a NEC Versa 4050H (P90MHz), depmod reports unresolved symbols for all the pcmcia modules. I have zircom and 3com pcmcia NICs, but I can't get the modules for either to load because of this unresolved symbol problem. Without the NIC, I can't get past the bas

Re: What are the most common causes of linux system hangs?

2000-04-14 Thread Rick Macdonald
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 02:47:46AM -0700, Joe Emenaker wrote: > > Every now and then, I'll have a Debian box that starts having fits of hard > > system hangs. Sometimes, it goes away when I turn off a daemon. Other times, > > it goes away when I put the hard drives in an entirely different comput

Need help with mirroring non-US

2000-04-14 Thread Rick Macdonald
I've been mirroring Debian at our office for years, but haven't been able to get non-US to mirror for many months. I get a "timeout at end of directory" error. I've tried different mirror sites with the same problem for both slink and potato. Below is what I have now that doesn't work for the non

Re: ftp.jimpick.com disappeared...

2000-04-14 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Eric G . Miller wrote: > ftp.jimpick.com seems to have disappeared. I was using it as a Debian > non-US mirror. Anybody know about this (or does it still resolve for > you)? apt-get update worked for me just now. I haven't been able to "mirror" on any non-US site for about

Re: XEmacs use 'Alt' as 'Meta'

2000-03-16 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Joseph A. Martin wrote: > Hello, > I feel like this should be a simple thing to do, but I haven't > been able to figure it out so far. I want XEmacs to my Left Alt key as > the Meta key. It works like that when I am running XEmacs from the > console. However, if I run XE

Re: Mirror Cannot get remote directory details

2000-02-27 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Bob Hilliard wrote: > What causes this error from mirror? > > > Cannot get remote directory details (debian/dists/potato/main/binary-all) > > I have gotten this consistently on */binary-all, and occasionally > on */binary-i386, since mid-January, using the same m

Re: problem doing slink -> frozen

2000-02-24 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Nathan E Norman wrote: > It's a circular pre-depends. I'm appending my previous email on the > subject. I've seen a few posts that say my method works, but I still > don't guarantee it :) > I created a file "/usr/bin/readlink" with the following contents: > > #! /bin/sh

Re: please help with new samba

2000-02-22 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Chris R. Martin wrote: > thanks for the file.. unfortunately it didn't solve my problem. > > The big thing I want to get rid of is the password to connect to "IPC$".. I > don't understand why Win98 keeps prompting for that. Also I want the shares > to be "publically" browsa

Re: please help with new samba

2000-02-19 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Chris R. Martin wrote: > I upgraded my samba package to frozen (2.0.6), and now it doesn't work with > my old smb.conf file. I've been up and down the samba docs and I've tried > all sorts of options which don't seem to have any effect (which probably > means I'm missing so

Re: Same disks different geometry?

2000-02-17 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Tiago Antao wrote: > I've a somewhat odd problem: I've 4 equal disks. The first 2 (one the > 1st ide) have one kind of geometry. The second 2, have other geometry > reported Does anyone knows why > hda: WDC WD136AA, 12971MB w/2048kB Cache, CHS=1653/255/63 > hdb: WDC

Re: mandb, man, manpath question

2000-02-17 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Johann Spies wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 04:31:53PM -0700, Rick Macdonald wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Johann Spies wrote: > > > > > After installing a few potato packages the manpages of some of them are > > > not available althoug

Re: mandb, man, manpath question

2000-02-15 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Johann Spies wrote: > I am trying to understand how man works. I have a mixed slink/potato > system. It seems to me that potato puts the manpages in /usr/share/man. So > I added /usr/share/man in /etc/manpath.conf and also in ~/.bash_profile > (the latter apparently causes "m

Re: 10 gig Drives W/O EZDrive?

2000-02-13 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, Dave Sherohman wrote: > split your system up across multiple partitions anyhow. I've got a 17Gb drive > in this machine, and setting it up was a breeze, although mke2fs choked when > I tried to make a 17Gb partition, so it's set up as an 8Gb and a 9Gb > instead...) I have a

Re: Don't use gcc 2.95 with 2.2.x kernels, revisted

2000-02-12 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 02:37:42PM -0700, Rick Macdonald wrote: > > > > http://kernelnotes.org/kpatch22.html > > bah, kernelnotes is inherently outdated... > that was 2.2.13, check the 2.2.14 Errata page (which kernelnotes sti

Re: 7200 RPM udma33 same speed as 5400 PIO mode 4

2000-02-11 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Dan Melomedman wrote: > Even if your drive can do UDMA33, it is only useful for transfers from > the drive's cache, since only they can reach that high transfer speed, > so that's where speed-ups come from, also this puts less strain on > your CPU. If I understand what you're

Don't use gcc 2.95 with 2.2.x kernels, revisted

2000-02-11 Thread Rick Macdonald
Recently folks here pointed out to me that it was known that gcc 2.95 is not to be used for 2.2.x kernels. Others said that it was OK with 2.2 kernels but not 2.0 kernels. Looking at various kernel and gcc deb packages in potato, I saw hints of the latter statement, but it didn't seem real clear

Re: 7200 RPM udma33 same speed as 5400 PIO mode 4

2000-02-11 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Dan Melomedman wrote: > > Check out my interesting timings: > using_dma= 0 (off) If I turn off "using_dma", my 9.4 drops down to 5.2. None of the other switches make much difference except this one. ...RickM...

Re: 7200 RPM udma33 same speed as 5400 PIO mode 4

2000-02-11 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Dan Melomedman wrote: > Well, then I guess your IDE can't do it any faster. How fast is the > machine, what chipset? P200MMX, Triton 430TX, IIRC (ASUS TX97-E). It seems like it must be the machine (motherboard). Surely UDMA2 (33MB/sec) 7200 RPM should be faster than the 5200r

Re: 7200 RPM udma33 same speed as 5400 PIO mode 4

2000-02-11 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 08:40:29AM -0700, Rick Macdonald generated a stream > of 1s and 0s: > > > > I added a Maxtor 27GB 7200rpm ATA66 drive to my P200MMX when I upgraded to > > potatos and kernel 2.2.14. > > > &g

7200 RPM udma33 same speed as 5400 PIO mode 4

2000-02-10 Thread Rick Macdonald
I added a Maxtor 27GB 7200rpm ATA66 drive to my P200MMX when I upgraded to potatos and kernel 2.2.14. My motherboard (ASUS TX97-E) only supports udma mode 2 (33MB/sec), but I find that this drive and my old WD 4GB (no UDMA) both show the same speed of about 9.4MB/sec with hdparm -t. Even if the n

SOLVED: Re: Unstable kernel question

2000-02-09 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Rick Macdonald wrote: > > > However, I just recompiled the 2.2.14 kernel (had to change gcc to gcc272 > > > in 3 places in the Makefile), but it still hangs when I boot it. > > > > > > It hangs after: > > > "Decompressing Lin

Re: Unstable kernel question

2000-02-09 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > However, I just recompiled the 2.2.14 kernel (had to change gcc to gcc272 > > in 3 places in the Makefile), but it still hangs when I boot it. > > > > It hangs after: > > "Decompressing Linux. OK, now boot the kernel". > Your compiler has nothing t

Re: Unstable kernel question

2000-02-08 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, aphro wrote: > On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Rick Macdonald wrote: > > rickma >I wonder if this is my problem? I just built 2.2.14 on potato, but it > rickma >fails to boot. It just hangs after saying "OK, boot kernel now". I > built > rickma &g

Re: Unstable kernel question

2000-02-08 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, aphro wrote: > also check the compiler you are using (gcc -v) it is reccomended to use > 2.7.2.3 when compiling a kernel, although there is some reports of success > with egcs 1.1 and very few success reports using egcs 2.95. I wonder if this is my problem? I just built 2.2.14

smb not working since POTATO install

2000-02-08 Thread Rick Macdonald
I upgraded my slink system to potato and the 2.2.14 kernel. All is well so far except for smb serving files to a Win95 box. I can access the Win95 shares, bit Win95 can't access my Linux box. This happened after the potato install before I switched to the new kernel from 2.0.34. I get this at the

Re: cant't upgrade libc6 using atp-get

2000-02-06 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, Johann Kallinovsky wrote: > I have Debian 2.0 installed. > I want to upgrade to 2.1. > > I'm using apt 0.3.4. > > I did copy all the files from my Debian-2.1-CDs onto my harddisc and edited > sources.list accordingly -> It seems to work. > > When I want to upgrade some packa

Re: StarOffice query

2000-02-05 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Dean Allen Provins wrote: > Rick: > > Thanks for responding. Curiously, my BACKSPACE key is a DELETE key on > the system in question. On this machine (also slink), it is identical > to yours (i.e. a BACKSPACE key). The 'xev' output for the former is: > > At ve6cta, the B

slink -> potato upgrade - safe NOW?

2000-02-04 Thread Rick Macdonald
I need to move on to the 2.2.x kernel and glibc 2.1. Is there anywhere look for some guidelines/problems if I upgrade now? The list of 271 release-critical bugs is a bit scary... ...RickM...

Re: StarOffice query

2000-02-03 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Dean Allen Provins wrote: > I just installed StarOffice on my slink system. Seems to work fine, > but I cannot get the BACKSPACE key to do anything. > > Anyone know how to make it move left and delete as it goes? Howdy, Dean! Works on my slink system. What does xev show for

Re: Graphics/X-windows programming: HowTo begin?

2000-01-15 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sat, 15 Jan 2000, Blazej Sawionek wrote: > Rick Macdonald wrote: > > > > On Sat, 15 Jan 2000, Blazej Sawionek wrote: > > > > > I need to create a simple graphics application under X: > > > open a window, mark some rectangular areas on it, than d

Re: Graphics/X-windows programming: HowTo begin?

2000-01-15 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sat, 15 Jan 2000, Blazej Sawionek wrote: > I need to create a simple graphics application under X: > open a window, mark some rectangular areas on it, than draw some curve lines > among those rectangles and that's all. > > Any piece of advice where to begin? You might consider using tkpaint

Re: wine_0.0.991212-1_i386.deb broken

2000-01-13 Thread Rick Macdonald
Off-topic, but does anybody know if Corel's wine dev efforts have been fed back to the wine project? ...RickM...

Re: Y2K fix for emacs19(potato/slink) and emacs20(slink)

1999-12-29 Thread Rick Macdonald
On 29 Dec 1999, Takuo KITAME wrote: > I think that emacs19 19.34(potato/slink) and emacs20 20.3(slink) has the y2k > problem in lisp/timezone.el. > Are package maintainer or anybody working for fix this? or already fixed? > > Here is the fixed timezone.el. > http://master.debian.org/~kitame/tmp

Re: massive root filesystem corruption

1999-12-26 Thread Rick Macdonald
I had similar problems. I thought it was my IDE drive but then I finally ran memtest86 (from hwtools) and it found that one of my 128MB DIMMs was bad. Give it a try. "4 passes" is apparently a complete run. ...RickM...

Re: streaming audio? (Re: wav <-> conversion utility)

1999-12-08 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Frank Barknecht wrote: > aphro hat gesagt: // aphro wrote: > > > On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, byoung wrote: > > > > b- >i tried to get the LAME, but wasn't able to. i'll try that again. > > > > its a good player, and check into not-lame its a breakoff(?) of lame, > > and has a differen

JDK 1.2 debs for slink?

1999-11-21 Thread Rick Macdonald
Are there JDK 1.2 debs for slink available? Preferably with native threads. ...RickM...

Re: Cannot print from StarOffice

1999-09-04 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sat, 4 Sep 1999, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > I am at wit's end here -- I have a `network' installation of StarOffice 5.1 > here at home for use by myself and my wife. It works fine, but just won't > print. I even re-downloaded 5.1 again, and reinstalled, but no luck. The > machine is current po

Re: KDE and Gnome together?

1999-08-31 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sorry about the dumb question. I just installed both Gnome and KDE in my > slink system, wanting to try both, and suddenly realized that I may not be > able to work with both. I had thought to use my .xsession file for gnome, > then switch to anothe

[OT] StarOffice memory usage: 7 processes!

1999-08-18 Thread Rick Macdonald
When I run StarOffice 5.1, I see the following in top (sorted by memory usage). Is this normal? Mem: 256980K av, 252556K used, 4424K free, 97084K shrd, 74920K buff Swap: 261496K av, 12K used, 261484K free 75220K cached PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %C

Latest gnome debs for SLINK?

1999-07-22 Thread Rick Macdonald
Where can I find the latest slink gnome debs? The one I last used doesn't seem to be there any more: deb http://www.debian.org/~jim/debian-gtk-gnome/gnome-stage-slink slink main ...RickM...

Re: music notation software for Linux

1999-07-22 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Benjamin E Frame wrote: > Does anyone know of any decen music notation software for Linux??? I'm > looking for something with a good GUI and that is easy to learn. Any > suggestions are appreciated!!! Click on Music Notation on this page: http://www.bright.net/~dlphilp/lin

Re: Tab Tab program/command line editing

1999-07-07 Thread Rick Macdonald
> ktb wrote: > > > > If you hit the tab key twice in a row it lists all available commands. > > This seems like a useless thing because I see no way of sending the > > output to 'less' and most of the 1917 possibilities scroll off the > > screen. Anyway my problem is I get the same result if I hi

Re: apt-get with a local tree ...

1999-06-30 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > deb file:/syjet/debian unstable main. > > > > > deb file://syjet/debian unstable main. > > ^ > > I think you need the extra / > > Does exactly the same effect, but i think it does not need an extra /, > since apt-get complains that the local

"Quick" boot from floppy?

1999-06-29 Thread Rick Macdonald
I've always used lilo, but I installed slink on a friends PC and for now he's using a boot floppy (to not interfere with his NT). It boots the whole kernel from the floppy. I thought there was a way to set up a boot floppy that somehow knows to switch to the harddrive partition and boot the kern

Re: How to pronouce "Debian"?

1999-06-29 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, jacko wrote: > Hmm . . . that doesn't really do it for me . . . any way somebody could > make a wave and post it somewhere? Three syllables, accent on the first. Deb sounds like Debbie, web and february. ian sounds like Ian: long e sound like we, tree, see, me, bee. Sounds li

Re: How to pronouce "Debian"?

1999-06-26 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Frankie wrote: > Further to this I understand the stress to be on the first syllable - DEBian. > May well be wrong though :-), Yes, that's right - accent on the first syllable. ...RickM...

Re: How to pronouce "Debian"?

1999-06-23 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, tboy wrote: > I'm not a native english speaker so i don't know how to pronouce > "Debian" --- it seems somewhat strange to me. When i introduce Debian > to my friends i have to spell it out letter by letter. Any help from > native english speakers? The name comes from two peo

Re: How to determine local IP

1999-06-21 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Ramesh Natarajan wrote: > This message was sent from Geocrawler.com by "Ramesh Natarajan" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > > Hi, Once dialed in, how to determine the local (dynamically assigned) > IP id? I know pppd invokes ip-up with the local IP. But outside that, > is there a env

Re: communicator 4.6 - ftp bug

1999-06-17 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > > my communicator 4.6 insists of unpacking certain types of files before > > > saving to hd. this behaviour is not acceptable, therefore i have to use > > > another version, which will download a file _unchanged_ if demanded. I have this problem w

Re: ftp ssh tunelling

1999-06-12 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sat, 12 Jun 1999, Lex Chive wrote: > There is a program named `sftp' in ssh2. It has the same interface than ftp > but works with ssh. Debian package is still ssh1.2, sftp is not included in > that version so you might consider upgrading ssh manually (the sources are on > http://www.ssh.fi). s

Re: my ip-up.d script doesn't work

1999-06-07 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > I just freshly reinstalled ppp on one machine here. My > custom script in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d does not work; it > doesn't appear to run. I tested it form the command Isn't your filename wrong? /etc/ppp/ip-up A program or scri

Re: OFFTOPIC: SDRAM PC100

1999-06-03 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Oleg Krivosheev wrote: > > > I don't know why the dimm went bad. I wouldn't think it's because the > > > 100/66MHz issue. > > > > I would surprise me too. I also run PC100 memory at 66 MHz with future > > upgrades in mind. > > old SDRAM had 5V voltage, PC100 is 3.3V But the

Re: OFFTOPIC: SDRAM PC100

1999-06-03 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The question is: if I buy a SDRAM PC100 chip, will it work on a > > computer with bus speed of 66Mhz ? > > Nope. I bought 2 128MB PC100 for my 66MHz ASUS, hoping that the dimms would still be usable when I get a new motherboard someday. I ran mem

Re: XF86Setup

1999-06-01 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, moron wrote: > I've run XF86Setup a dozen times in the last day or two, but I wasn't aware > of being invited to do anything I would call 'configuring the order of > modes'. Certainly, nobody asked me if if I wanted virtual desktop. But > you've got three desktop screens runn

Re: XF86Setup

1999-06-01 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 31 May 1999, Andrei Ivanov wrote: > by about 3/4 inch. I vidtune it everytime I have to restart X, which is > not very often. I am sure there is a way to change settings in XF86Setup, > but I just don't feel like doing it.). In xvidtune, just click "Show" (near bottom left). It prints the

Re: XF86Setup

1999-06-01 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, moron wrote: > >> I've got a dozen 'Subsection "Display"' entries - under Driver Accel, > >> Driver SVGA, Driver VGA16 and Driver VGA2. In each case there is one > line: > >> Modes "1024*768""800*600""640*480" > >Virtual for each subsection, which you would set to the

Re: XF86Setup

1999-05-31 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, moron wrote: > >In the XF86Config file, in Section "Screen", add a "Virtual" parameter to > >each subsection, and set it to the max res for that subsection. > I've got a dozen 'Subsection "Display"' entries - under Driver Accel, > Driver SVGA, Driver VGA16 and Driver VGA2. In

Re: XF86Setup

1999-05-31 Thread Rick Macdonald
yOn Mon, 31 May 1999, moron wrote: > XF86Setup. I've configured things for 1024*768, 800*600 and 640*480. > Whichever of the modes (is that the right word?) I'm in, the screen size > stays at 1024*768. If, for example, I'm in 640*480, my physical screen > displays 5/8 (okay, 25/64) of the availa

Re: HAMM -> SLINK

1999-05-29 Thread Rick Macdonald
yOn Sat, 29 May 1999, Matthew McFarlane wrote: > I have HAMM installed. I have the slink distro files. what's the best > way to upgrade (apt?) and how? The instructions are in the file main/Release-Notes. I think I added apt as a method in dselect, and then let dselect to its thing. ...RickM..

Re: Color Bit Depth

1999-05-21 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 21 May 1999, dyer wrote: > > I have a small question about XF86 and color bit depths. I have my > > machine running a 32 bit color at the moment, but some times I I would > > like to change it to 16 bit for the ocational game of Quake, is there a > > easy way to do this with out editing t

Re: Where is gnulibc2.1?

1999-05-15 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sat, 15 May 1999, George Bonser wrote: > > Is gnulibc2.1 available as a debian package somewhere? If so, then where? > > The [EMAIL PROTECTED] client requires it now. Any help would be > > appreciated. > > That would be libc6.1 or glibc2.1 same thing. Yes, but it doesn't do a slink user

Re: Where is gnulibc2.1?

1999-05-15 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Eric Bass wrote: > Is gnulibc2.1 available as a debian package somewhere? If so, then where? > The [EMAIL PROTECTED] client requires it now. Any help would be appreciated. Have they said that they aren't putting out a glibc2 version like they did for all the betas? I sent

[OT] Low versus medium priced scanners

1999-05-09 Thread Rick Macdonald
When comparing a cheap scanner (under $100) such as the Plustek 96xx series with a medium price scanner such as the so-called business-class HP 5200c, I can't tell what claims are due to the scanner hardware itself, or simply the bundled software. Obviously, the bundled software does a Linux user

[OT] /proc/interrupts from multi-CPU machine

1999-04-23 Thread Rick Macdonald
Could I trouble somebody, anybody, out there to send me an example of the /proc/interrupts file from a machine with more than one CPU? Just execute: cat /proc/interrupts ...RickM...

Re: The case of the missing 64 meg...

1999-04-22 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Vincent Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 12:31:39AM -0400, Will Lowe wrote: > > .. Simplest thing to do is put: > > > > append="mem=128m" > > > > in your lilo.conf file. For my 96 meg machine, I've got a stanza that > > reads: > > what if i don't use lilo and i w

Re: LLS: Debian/Redhat Alliance

1999-04-20 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Lyno Sullivan wrote: > As soon as I get a chance I am going to write an article recommending that > Redhat and Debian form an alliance. Redhat becomes the distributor to 1) > commercial operations and 2) people who are only interested in being free > software consumers. Sorr

Re: KDE 1.1 Library Problem

1999-04-20 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Jerry Gardner wrote: > > I downloaded and installed the KDE 1.1 .debs on my Slink > system. Whenever I try to run applications that use libkfile.so, I get > the following error: > > % kedit & > kedit: error in loading shared libraries > /usr/X11R6/lib/libkfile.so.2: undefin

Re: [off topic] new apt ?

1999-04-18 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Chad A. Adlawan wrote: > i see ppl are still fighting about debian and redhat and dselect and stuff > ... anyway, would someone please try and check out > http://www.debian.org/~jgg/apt/screenshots/ ??? i was roaming around a > while ago when i saw them ... > any idea w

Re: KDE .deb libs problem

1999-04-17 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sun, 18 Apr 1999, Damon Muller wrote: > When I try and run some programs, such as kab, I get the following > error: > > Wrong JPEG library version: library is 62, caller expects 61 I don't know what kab is, but I just tried it and I get the same error that you have. :-( ...RickM...

Re: new ATI graphics boards

1999-04-16 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Stephan Engelke wrote: > I am thinking of upgrading my computer's graphics board to > either one of the two new ATI cards: ATI Rage Magnum or ATI Rage Fury. > Now I am wondering if anyone has any experience with either one of > these two boards? How do they perform under X11

Re: KDE .deb libs problem

1999-04-16 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Damon Muller wrote: > I downloaded the kde 1.1 debs from a local kde mirror, and installed > them without any problem on my freshly installed, pure-slink box. > I had to install qt from potato: > ii qt1g1.42-2 Shared Library used by applications linked > w

Re: Screen capture program?

1999-04-15 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Mark Wagnon wrote: > I'm putting together a Linux presentation for a communications class, > and I'd like to be able to show some images of my desktop running > several different apps. > > Dows anyone know of any programs that will allow me to capture what's on > the desktop?

Re: MICROSOFT BS FUD

1999-04-14 Thread Rick Macdonald
On 14 Apr 1999, Gary L. Hennigan wrote: > | Well, while I agree with that, this is already being read and believed by > | managers and suits. What we need are numbers to the contrary, not "it was > | commisioned by Microsoft". > > Again, any logical person would conclude that the test was biased

Re: MICROSOFT BS FUD

1999-04-14 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Kenneth Scharf wrote: > Well it finally happened. Microsoft has paid someone off to fix a > benchmark showing that Windows NT is actually better than linux. > > http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html This doesn't look good. Are the results cooked or flawed, o

Re: Help with KDE and Debian Slink

1999-04-12 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Ajit Krishnan wrote: > well, i got the kde-binaries from ftp.kde.org. I haven't been able to find > any > binaries on any of the debian mirrors (well, not for slink anyway). is there a > staging area for slink kde binaries? And wouldn't the hamm packages still be > using the

Re: Help with KDE and Debian Slink

1999-04-12 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Alec Smith wrote: > I had been using KDE for awhile under Slink without difficulty. Then I > took the time to learn how to do the fvwm2 menus since its faster than > KDE. :) Yeah, I installed it out of curiousity (and peer pressure ;-), along with gnome, ice, enlightenment, b

Re: Help with KDE and Debian Slink

1999-04-12 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Ajit Krishnan wrote: > I've been having the same problem as well.i've been looking for 217, but > can't find it. IIRC, I got it from a so-called "hamm" mirror. The slink mirrors actually seemed like potato (depended on glib6 2.1). ...RickM...

Re: Help with KDE and Debian Slink

1999-04-12 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sun, 11 Apr 1999, Brian Schramm wrote: > I have installed the deb files for qt1.42, kde off the kde ftp site, and I > have > upgraded from hamm to Slink. > > Now about half of the KDE applications give back this error: > > kdbash-2.01$ kedit > kedit: error in loading shared libraries > /usr/

Re: [off-topic] How to auto-run xlock?

1999-04-09 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 10:49:07PM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote: > > I have a program that I want to run only while my PC is unattended. I > > don't need the screen locked necessarily. > How about the "xautolock" packa

Mirror permission error on mutt...deb

1999-04-09 Thread Rick Macdonald
I hope I'm sending this to the correct mirror administrator. I'm getting the following error because the file binary-i386/mutt-i_0.93i-1.1.deb has permissions only of "0400": Mirrored debian-unstable-non-US (nonus.debian.org:/debian-non-US/dists/unstable/non-US -> /disk1/rickm/dists/unstable/non

Re: [off-topic] How to auto-run xlock?

1999-04-08 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Michael Stenner wrote: > >I need to try various nice values and pay more attention, but I could > >"feel" it's presence when it's running at nice=1. It's all numerical > > nice=19 is the LOWEST priority, nice=-20 is the HIGHEST. Negative > numbers are only available to root.

Re: [off-topic] How to auto-run xlock?

1999-04-08 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 08:06:51AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote: > > This is great! Thanks! I don't even need xlock now. I'll just start/stop > > the SETI program directly. > > > > Now, does anybody know if there i

Re: [off-topic] How to auto-run xlock?

1999-04-08 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: > > I'd like this exact behaviour but somehow I need xlock to always be > > running, waiting to jump in after the idle period. > > I thought about this problem before, and now realised you can check > keyboard and mouse activity looking at /proc/inter

[off-topic] How to auto-run xlock?

1999-04-08 Thread Rick Macdonald
I have a program that I want to run only while my PC is unattended. I don't need the screen locked necessarily. xlock does this for me: xlock +nolock -startCmd startsetiathome -mode blank but I have to run it manually. When I log back in, it does kill the running command (startsetiathome) just

Re: where is Pine?

1999-04-06 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Dpk wrote: > If the file ~/mbox exists, pine will move your inbox mail to this > file. To maintain your mailbox in /var/spool/mail you can either: > > 1. (re)Move the file ~/mbox > 2. Disable this option in your ~/.pinerc by modifying the > disable-these-drivers l

Re: where is Pine?

1999-04-06 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Paul Nathan Puri wrote: > http://ompages.com/debian/pkgs/pine/pine.html The above URL seems to need www.ompages.com. I looked at pine 4.05 back in October, and found that it no longer reads and modifies /var/spool/mail directly. It copies the mail to its own mail file in my h

Re: email threat

1999-04-06 Thread Rick Macdonald
On 5 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Forgive my ignorance here (and my curiousity) but just ... who is Eric > > Raymond, and who are you (or what you've done/said) so that he threatens > > you? > > I'm tempted to say "he's just a nut", but he's the head of the Ope

Re: Good notation program for linux

1999-04-05 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Craig Hancock wrote: > Wouldn't it be great if finale was orted to linux ...or ran under wine. ...RickM...

Re: GNOME query

1999-04-04 Thread Rick Macdonald
On 4 Apr 1999, Martin Bialasinski wrote: > My .xsession file looks something like this: > > xsetroot -solid slategrey & > xrdb -load $HOME/.Xdefaults > fvwm2 & > exec /usr/bin/gnome-session Is there anything in gnome besides the gnome pager that doesn't work with the (non gnome-compliant)

Re: GNOME 1.0 .deb package?

1999-04-03 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote: > > Ah. Now that I have that fixed, what's the proper place for enlightenment > > 0.15 debs for slink? The following contains dependencies on glibg6 >=2.1 > > so I think it must be for potato: > > > > deb http://www.debian.org/~bma enlightenment/ > >

Re: GNOME 1.0 .deb package?

1999-04-02 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote: > > > deb http://www.debian.org/~jim/debian-gtk-gnome/gnome-stage-slink \ > > > unstable main > > > > What's the difference between the above and: > > > > deb http://www.debian.org/~jules/gnome-stage-2 unstable main > > > > What should one use for a

Re: GNOME 1.0 .deb package?

1999-04-02 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote: > > So, does anyone know if and where I could find GNOME 1.0 as a Debian > > package, by any chance? I could recompile the source, but I already have > > indeed possible. > > Are you using apt? Good. Then, put the following line in your > /etc/apt/sou

Re: Using powersave Features on monitor

1999-03-30 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Sean wrote: > But does that really send it into powersave mode? When setterm blanks the > screen, > the CRT guns are still running, as the back of the monitor is still warm to > the > touch, whereas when Windows puts the monitor into powersave mode, the back of > the > mon

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >