Kevin Mark wrote:
> I recall they are huge, requiring a lot of floor space and required a
> noise cover otherwise you'd hear ear-splitting, griding noise. X-(
Yup, yup and yup. Of course having to work on some model or another of
green-bar printer for the past year-and-a-half lemme tell you,
Justin Hartman wrote:
> Wouldn't the Debian Live CD work as a better option?
Not really. Since Debian has so many different release architectures they
really don't push automatic detection and configuration as far as the splinter
distributions which focus mostly on the x86 architecture. A go
is is because to
cram so much into so little space many Laptop manufacturers put in tons
of proprietary hardware then only code drivers for whatever OS they
intend to ship with it. Worse still they only ship the drivers, never
really releasing them.
--
Steve Lamb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Ron Johnson wrote:
> *Solving* the corrupted-mbox problem means moving to Maildir (or,
> less popularly, mh) storage.
Which is not a panacea. All it does is introduce a different set of
problems. ~20,000 individual files in a directory may be more resilient
against corruption part way throu
charlie derr wrote:
> No, we use dovecot which stores email files in Maildir format on the
> server.
Dovecot *can* store mail in MailDir. It is not a given.
dovecot-common - secure mail server that supports mbox and maildir mailboxes
dovecot-imapd - secure IMAP server that supports mbox and
Dave Sherohman wrote:
> OK, one more time: Delete by default does not have to mean delete
> *immediately* by default. Look at the underlined text above. I already
> explicitly stated that I didn't mean immediate deletion and that delete-
> on-folder-change or delete-on-exit are probably better,
Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:30:33PM +, Virgo Pärna wrote:
> I think I'll side with the people who think this obscure use of the word
> "compact" is a bug in IceDove (and just continue using mutt).
You mean the people who are oblivious to the fact that compact, as you
tom arnall wrote:
> last night my system ground to a halt with a full disk. looking at the logs,
> i
> discovered that they were the main if not the only resource hogs. (haven't
Had a similar problem happen here. Firefox had generated 14Gb of error
logs, the same error repeated over and o
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> I think that has more to do with Opera marginalizing themselves by
>>> expecting people to put up with *more* ads or pay for a web browser.
>> That has little to do with what the websites do w
Paul Johnson wrote:
> I think that has more to do with Opera marginalizing themselves by expecting
> people to put up with *more* ads or pay for a web browser.
That has little to do with what the websites do with the user agent string
than anything else.
> Sounds like the actual problem is th
Paul Johnson wrote:
> I would argue that if the value of your User-Agent string affects browsing
> habits, then the bug is with the website, not the browser.
This is a battle you, and anyone else who thinks like you, is going to
lose. Opera has had user agent munging for it's entire existence
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/28/07 16:26, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
>>> There is actually an operational difference. In the about:config page
>>> the setting general.useragent.extra.firefox is set to
>>> "Iceweasel/2.0.0.1". Looks harmless, but it stopped me from logging
>>> on to a website. It wou
Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Sunday 28 January 2007 07:01, Martin Schulze wrote:
>> Remember the Cola tests? Blindfolded have preferred Pepsi over Coca,
>> with eyes open the result they preferred the Coca variant.
> Funny. Blindfolded I took the same as I did without the blindfold. Coke
> either way
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 06:18:19PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Like the people who read the CNN article about sterilizing sponges
>> in the microwave?
> What about sterilizing sponges in the microwave?
T'hell with the sponges, how does one read CNN, exactly?
--
John C wrote:
> It's kinda like a religious fanaticism... "everyone should act and
> believe like I do". And yes, you're absolutely right - there is too much
> bile being spewed at top posters.
No, it's not. It's called a convention for communicating with one
another. Do you call it religiou
Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
> 7.0 is a pretty aggressive score for rejecting at SMTP time. I think that
> if you configure it to be like that, you are guaranteed to have some
> spurious blocking. Try relaxing the reject-at-SMTP score (I /dev/null
> mails at 22.0).
Uh... yeeaaahhh. Let's see, when
Raquel wrote:
> So change it to the score you want exim.org to get in your local.cf
> file ... or whitelist it.
Er, not the point. I mean since I clearly have spent time in my SA
configuration file that's not the problem. The problem is why these obviously
horrible sources need to be address
Justin Gallardo wrote:
> When replying to an email, is it proper to leave the original poster in
> the To: line of the email, and the CC the list?
I am a staunch believer that if one is replying to a post on the list it
should go to the list only. Reply-to-all defeats the very purpose of the
Recently a ton of mail running through SA has been hitting the soft-limit
for spam. I have it set tight, 5.0 for mark and pass. 7.0 for reject at
SMTP. Mail from this list, from Exim's list, mail from an MMORPG I play and
from a motorcycle web site I went to all got blocked. Ok, so maybe so
media player.
MP3 - Low-bit for my portable MP3 player.
Of course if I could find a portable OGG player that would drop to 2 but
still, that's more than what most do right now. Hmmm, might have to
hack Jack, it is in Python. Hmmmm...
--
Steve Lamb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
en happening for years.
Heck, it's even touched Debian to an extent through Ubuntu and its
offshoots.
Money isn't the problem, dogma is.
--
Steve Lamb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sue Kim wrote:
> Neither, yo.
>
> If you want security you need grsecurity's gradm RBAC patch installed. I
> bet I could hack your system in 12 seconds.
Pardon me if I am less than impressed by someone posting from an anonymous
account, making spurious claims and begins their missive with the
Olive wrote:
> This answer in't entirely convincing. For example if you can sudo with
> the normal password account, I do see any difference in security in
> allowing root ssh or not.
Operative word, "if". That's a big series of ifs.
If sudo is installed.
If it is configured to allo
Tom Allison wrote:
> Can anyone direct me towards debian based dedicated server hosting
> companies?
Dunno what kind of hosting you need but on the cheap(er) side would be Xen
virtual servers w/Debian installed. Here's a quickie link:
http://hostingfu.com/vps/xen-hosting
Personally I've
David E. Fox wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:40:00 +0100
> Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How many peoples have there OWN mailservers?
> /me does. Actually I cheat a bit.
Actually Michelle cheats a bit. How many people have their OWN
mailserver? Uhhh, I was talking MTAs. O
Russell L. Harris wrote:
> Unless you are not running X, why is that a problem?
Uhm, maybe the times when X is broken? Takes a hell of a lot more to
break the console.
Or maybe people want to run minimalist and not bother with X if they don't
have to?
Or maybe even that the CL tools
Russell L. Harris wrote:
> Unless you are not running X, why is that a problem?
Uhm, maybe the times when X is broken? Takes a hell of a lot more to
break the console.
Or maybe people want to run minimalist and not bother with X if they don't
have to?
Or maybe even that the CL tools
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Having worked at places which are majority windows and minority *nix, I
> can honestly say that the windows approach tends to encourage "tasking"
> of "junior" level admins to repetitive tasks by hand, because the
> "senior" admins don't want to do it themselves (i.e., t
Stephen Yorke wrote:
> To each their own BUT...
But nothing.
> Now look at 2003...it is rock solid in my thoughts unless you are
> looking at the WWW/HTML/.NET patches which were released recently but
> then again if you are looking at those and saying the OS is unsecure you
> must be running
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Only if you receive your mail OVER a MTA.
Er, right, which is how most people do it.
> With fetchmail you must download and filter
Uh, no. The most common fetchmail method is to drop into the local MTA.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> And why do Debian need three similar programs which do the same thing?
> But unfortiunatly it is... since those which want to be individual and
> use only fvwm are cuted to older apps which are "not more supported"
> and deprecated since GNOME and KDE exist!
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> if you receive messages which have a "-request" in there E-mail
> then it is always spam (at least for Debian lists) ant it can
> be filtered out easily with procmail or mailrop.
Er, uh, aren't those after SA in the server-side chain? Sure would be
here if I used eit
John O'Hagan wrote:
> On Thursday 09 November 2006 03:40, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> SO I wonder what happened to the OP? Is he just watching waiting for
>> the right solution, or is he long gone?
> [...]
> OP? What OP? :)
The one who hopefully got an A for his answer.
--
Ste
Douglas Tutty wrote:
> Sometimes its too easy to keep trying to solve the wrong problem.
True, but it sure does answer the question "How do you keep a programmer
geek busy?" :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream
Douglas Tutty wrote:
> After thinking about it, yes it can all go in one line. Its more
> elegant and doesn't use up memory space but its harder to read to
> understand what its doing.
Depends on what you define as elegant. I dropped Perl several years ago
in preference to Python because I f
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> tr -d '\n'
>
> deletes the new lines
Ahhh, ok. Was still going off of the previous Python examples which
didn't delete newlines, only replaced them with spaces. Mea Culpa.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key:
Ron Johnson wrote:
> But because of their lock on the desktop, they also have incredible
> userland and developer mindshare.
You sure? I had a rather interesting conversation at work the other day.
I work at a casino outside of Vegas and the guy in charge of what technology
we use for our pr
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:10:08AM +1100, John O'Hagan wrote:
>> Or the whole thing could even be done with (I think!):
>> #tr -d '\n' < IN | tr ' ' '\n' | grep -B1 Processor | grep -v 'Processor\|--'
> nice.
Except for one problem. Look at the OP's post and y
Ron Johnson wrote:
> "Infinitely opening windows" != "the NY Times popping open a
> 'sidebar' window". And there are lots of sites that do that. Too
> many to whitelist.
Not in my experience. I haven't noticed any reduced functionality from
not having popups. In fact it's kept me out of so
Carl Fink wrote:
> You don't use synaptic
Er, X for package selects?
> or dselect, eh?
Full screen for package selects? :D
'sides dselect < aptitude's full screen. :P
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dr
Carl Fink wrote:
> It's easier to install on Debian. That's all.
How, exactly? I'm betting that Firefox will just live in non-free and be
just as easy to install as IceWeasel.
aptitude install firefox
aptitude install iceweasel
Hmm, wait, iceweasel will be harder... 2 more letters.
--
Anyone know how to get VNC to not log it's errors? I have gotten into the
habit of using VNC as my main interface on my server machine. Every few weeks
the log fills up root forcing me to shut down VNC so it'll close the log file
and allow it to be deleted. As you can see, a tad large...
[E
cothrige wrote:
> I don't really follow you here. How does holding imply not talking?
> Surely you don't make a habit of talking about topics you don't hold
> views on? ;-)
Play on words, "holding it to one self" and "holding views". Point being
that not everyone is using Debian for the same
cothrige wrote:
> Is this really "off putting"? Why? Maybe I am just not really seeing
> what is meant here, but I cannot recall a single instance of being
> bothered because somebody held a particular view concerning the
> political or philosophical nature of GNU or Linux.
Holding? No. Sh
Damon L. Chesser wrote:
> No, you are right, but as far as I know, it is NOT included by default
> in any Linux. Nos Suse, not FC, not Ubuntu, not Debian, not any I have
> tried.
Mepis? One of my on-again-off-again projects is to drop Windows for my
gaming platform. Switching to OSX is one
Ron Johnson wrote:
> SSMTP over non-standard ports?
Doesn't much help since it drops back onto the old net. Fido (the tech,
not just the net) is a completely different technology in that it doesn't need
the ether, it isn't unified, it is something that anyone can participate in
and there's re
Mike McCarty wrote:
> If people around here (and elsewhere) would quit treating Linux/GNU
> project as if it were a religion, a political statement, a way to
> change the world paradigm, a poke in the eye at the mythically evil
> MicroSoft Empire, an end to capitalism as we know it, and a triumph
>
Miles Bader wrote:
> Indeed. A simple "No" would suffice.
It rarely does because for it to suffice the newcomer would have to leave
it at that. They, at least in my experience, never do.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 |
Chris Walters wrote:
>>> Anyone remember FidoNET?
> Yes, I definitely remember FidoNet - I even ran a BBS there for a while.
Better still, anyone find themselves nostalgic over FidoNET and wondering
if there might be a growing need for it? Not in terms of spam but in terms of
privacy? Sinc
David Hart wrote:
> Then perhaps you should've made it clear that that's what you meant.
> But this is beside the point.
My point was quite clear. I've gone over it in the past. I never
mentioned "in this conversation". I did, in fact, say it was That was your
misunderstanding.
> I've had
David Hart wrote:
> It proves the point that T.J. Duchene made to which you gave those
> examples in reply. Here's what was said (and what you snipped from your
> reply to me):
Can we say... "out of context"?
>> T.J. Duchene wrote:
>>
>>> Don't expect Outlook, Thunderbird, Mutt, Pine, or eve
Bruno wrote:
> However my conclusion is this week-end I'll move back to Fedora (even if yum
> is so far behind dpkg).
Why switch off apt/dpkg if you think they are superior? There are Debian
based distributions which you could try first which attempt to address the
problems you're experienci
David Hart wrote:
> Most of what you say kind of proves the OP's point. You mention 'hooks'
> which means using programs _external_ to the email client.
Er, no. Hooks in the client does not equate to requiring a full-blown MTA
along with the problems that arise from it.
--
Steve C
David Hart wrote:
> I have no need to read the archives as I have a threaded view of this
> conversation in front of me as I write.
Uh, doesn't help when it wasn't *IN* this conversation. But dozens of
times over the past *5 years*. Hence, get thee to the archives.
> I didn't realise that p
T.J. Duchene wrote:
> Granted, several of the new MUAs aka "mail clients" or more precisely
> "mail user agents" have some very primitive filtering capabilities, but
> ladies and gentlemen, the most practical mail filtering or sorting is
> almost always done server side before your MUA even gets th
Nicolaus Kedegren wrote:
> Flame me, please, i wear asbestos clothing and i eat fire for breakfast.
*douses Nicolaus with ice and stuffs a weasel down his pants.*
Bet he wasn't expecting that.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> The goal is to mix mail. And yes, Mutt can't do that when dealing
> with multiple accounts (they all appear in a separate mailbox).
Not true, mutt excels at mixing mail to the point where it is utterly
incapable of doing so without forcing the user to go to extraordina
John Hasler wrote:
> Nominative uses are not restricted by trademark law in the US. Debian can
> say "Iceweasel is built from the same sources as Firefox." "Iceweasel works
> exactly like Firefox." "Iceweasel is functionally equivalent to Firefox"
> etc. without infringing the trademark. It is pr
David Hart wrote:
> Been there, done that, look at the third link above to see why it does.
> ;-)
Doesn't keep mail separate. Please, read the archives before going
further. I'm sick and tired of mutt zealots telling me it does what it
doesn't do and thinking a few links equates to a reasone
David Hart wrote:
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual.html#pop
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual.html#imap
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual.html#account-hook
Been there, discussed that, look at "mixing of mail" to see why it
doesn't. kkthxbuhbyenow!
--
Steve C.
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Yes, in a perfect world. But one may have several mail accounts.
> So, one may want to retrieve mail from one account by POP or IMAP
> and store it to an IMAP mailbox (from which all the mail from
> every account is read with a MUA).
Er... why? That's why modern mail
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> fetchmail -> exim -> procmail -> IMAP storage -> dovecot -> MUA (tbird
> or mutt depending...)
> procmail clearly handles IMAP just fine, all you have to do is put a /
> at the end of the location to store the mail and it handles it as IMAP.
You mean Maildir? I
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Not just MUAs do IMAP. MDAs can do it too. And procmail is also a
> MDA (according to its documentation). However procmail is no longer
> developed and is too old to support IMAP. But couldn't mailagent
> support IMAP via a Perl module?
Er... how and why? I'm really c
Hans du Plooy wrote:
> Calling someone a weasel has never been a compliment
*covers his ferrets eyes* Hey, there's children present! Sheesh, some
people.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
--
Mumia W.. wrote:
> Taking down the botnet is another way to fight the spam. It doesn't
> always work as planned:
Not directed solely at you, Mumia, just something that I've been meaning
to say for weeks now. Know what would really help? If people would stop
replying to spam, quoting spam or
Tyler wrote:
> I would be happy to be corrected; I find these licensing issues more
> than a little confusing.
They're simple. "Mine!" Done.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In international copyright law, there are rights belonging to the author
> that he cannot sign away. These include the right to be considered the
> author. This means that if the document mentions him as author (perhaps
> on a title page) it is illegal to change that
Tyler Smith wrote:
> I understand there have been some situations where an author attempted
> to undermine the license by declaring an entire document to be
> invariant. This is clearly not the case here, though.
That is immaterial. It's like saying that if code were pretty much
entirely free
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Imagine someone writing a piece of documentation for a software, but
> after some time stops keeping it up-to-date.
Is the license only for technical documents or would it also be applicable
to, say, works of fiction or business/political missives which contain some
tec
Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> c) Cannot use vim to compose emails.
> If I am using a mailing list interface, I can use kmail to read my emails,
> and
> vim to write replies. In forums I cannot do that. I am being restricted by
> their st**id editor.
Know what I can never wrap my brain aroun
Julian De Marchi wrote:
> I am NOT trying to take over any of the other forums. Sorry if it seemed
> that way. I wish to create a place for people to talk about more in depth
> problems, where the answers can be archived and retrived by all. Forums
> will never beat mailling lists!
Not even fo
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday 24 September 2006 14:16, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> filtering Webforums are to communications as email/newsgroups/BBSes were in
>> the mid-80s. Why anyone would want to go back 20 years is beyond me.
> Even BBS's had offline QWK packet readers for
Dave Sherohman wrote:
> So, what are the advantages of changing to a web forum which are so
> compelling that not wanting to give up the advantages of mail looks like
> fear of change?
None as far as I can tell. They're not properly threaded, there's no way
to easily and effectively killfile
Julian De Marchi wrote:
> I would be willing to setup a Debian Forum for the users of this mailing
> list on my web servers. Would there be much interest out there for this?
Do a search in the archives and see how often this subject has come up.
Then realize there isn't really a prolific forum
Owen Heisler wrote:
> I tried it at the link he provided and got an avi file.
Yeah, read that later in the thread. Seems things have changed recently
as the last time I tried I only got a link. My apologies for the bad
information.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what
Owen Heisler wrote:
> Can you not use the Download link at the right to download the videos?
Nope. That only downloads a link which is played in the Google player.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
-
Paul Johnson wrote:
> I really have to wonder what happened to Steve anyway. He and I used to get
> along quite well on this list
We never got along.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
-
Michael Ott wrote:
> And now I want a new backup system which work nearly like rdiff-backup:
> Copy only last changed data to another box. But no problems when the
> boxes lost the connection or something like that
Personally I use dirvish. It only needs ssh/rsync on the remote side and
is ve
Paul Johnson wrote:
> How am I a proponent of Big Brother? I would say that's a pretty empty
> accusation, especially coming from someone who doesn't know me.
Your publicly announced political affiliation pretty much is all that is
need to be known about you.
--
Steve C. Lamb
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 September 2006 19:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Big Brother!!
> Yes indeed. You should be concerned about such things or they become the
> norm
> for worse. A great man once told me, "Only the paranoid survive."
So says a proponent of Big Brothe
K. Richard Pixley wrote:
> The linux market hasn't really ever competed in those markets. There
> aren't any serious photography apps, video editing apps, etc. What will
> hurt linux in the market place is DRM. I can play dvd's on my mac. I
> can't on most out-of-the-box linux distributions.
Richard wrote:
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/08/29/36OPcurve_1.html
> Make sure you click the TALK BACK to us link, and tell Tom what
> you really think of his article...
I think he has a point. I mean I want an OSX machine because of it's
hybrid nature.
--
Steve C. Lamb
CaT wrote:
> Qmails logging is horrendous. There is no link between logs of
> connections and the source and destination of an email. This makes
> tracking an IP of a single hit to many destinations a right rotten pain
> in the arse if not impossible. Its internal message ids are recycled so
> if y
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> the most annoying parts are accept-then-bounce behaviour
This is a serious flaw, IMHO. I had to deal with a qmail system in a
production environment. A few dozen domains hosted on a single box times a
few dozen boxes. Because of the mail policies of the admin
Matej Cepl wrote:
> One term -- internal messages. forwarding messages to some special users is
> so fun (like mail2news gateway posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Then that is, by definition, not a smarthost, is it? Smarthost = "handle
all my mail, kkthxbye."
--
Steve C. Lamb
T wrote:
> Problem is, the above setting doesn't cover my case, in which the
> smarthost server requires username and password for SMTP SSL
> authentication.
No, but it is also not everything nullmailer can do. I was just giving a
simple example of a simple case, no more, no less. The point
T wrote:
> Why? You'll have better support. Recently I need to config my MTA to use
> smarthost to talk to my ISP. For several weeks, I tried to do it with
> Exim. Then another several weeks on postfix, I searched and asked, all
> efforts ended no where.
Not sure why anyone who needs just a s
Derek Martin wrote:
> But it IS there... so what's the problem?
The presumption that it is.
> A simple minimal ESMTP
> engine might be more convenient -- and numerous solutions for that are
> available for mutt -- but being able to choose to use a full-fledged
> MTA like sendmail offers the u
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> You read more then One message at a time?
Yes. Person A says Person B said something important while talking
to Person C. So you have Message A open so you can find what is referenced in
Message B. Hell, I do it all the time just on debian-user. Surely you with
yo
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2006-08-26 17:14:27, schrieb Steve Lamb:
>> Exactly. I would love to but it can't.
>set sendmail="sendmail -oi"
As mentioned before this is not the same and you know it.
>> Yet filtering belongs in the clie
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I send E-mails via smtp... => set sendmail="sendmail -oi"
No, that is via command line. If sendmail were not there how would you
get mail out? Or, more importantly, which is easier to set up, sendmail
(exim, postfix, qmail) or a single configuration option which c
Derek Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:49:32PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> No... the rules are static, and there are exactly two of them. The
> user can only change the limits of the rules, not the rules
> themselves.
Changing means they are flexible. Inflexible would b
Derek Martin wrote:
> Any reasonably intelligent person could surmise that what he meant was
> according to a reasonably flexible set of rules that the user could
> define. It does not do that.
Sure it does. It is a reasonably flexible set of rules. It just isn't a
highly flexible set of r
Micha Feigin wrote:
> mozilla firefox keeps crashing on me very consistently lately. It crashes
> almost immediately on most sites and disabling all plugins doesn't seem to
> help
> at all.
Any sites on which it does it constantly? If so could you give a URL so
we can see if it crashes ours?
Enrique Morfin wrote:
> It doesn't matter what user is (even root).
> It doesn't matter what Konsole is.
> It doesn't matter what term is.
What shell are you using?
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
-
Stephen wrote:
> It is ? I have that version and I don't see any button to 'reply to
> list'. What am I missing ?
Well, the only thing I could ever surmise from the bugzilla discussion
about the feature is that they could never decide on exactly how to do it. A
button on its own? A drop down
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
> If I don't trust my own eyes, what else do I have to believe? :) I
> experienced this problem and this experience was the reason to drop
> (reluctantly, though) Firefox. And I see
> (http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2451257) that other
> people have this problem,
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
> I use Sylpheed. Not a gem, but suitable, especially with full
> keyboard control. I could live with TB, too, but I was too annoyed by
> its' inability to copy a sent message to 'Sent' IMAP folder (recent
> messages at mozillazine forums show that the problem still
> persists.
CJ van den Berg wrote:
> Yes, it will. If it doesn't, then your filesystem is probably mounted
> noatime. Mutt uses the filesystem's atime to determine whether mbox files
> contain new mail.
Uh, since mutt's main display never updated when I was on that screen the
display never updated when n
Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Officially with version 3.0. But the mentioned patch is included in TB
> 1.5.0.5 thanks to the TB package maintainers.
Oh my, Mathias, thank you for mentioning this. 10 seconds later and one
less wart on Thunderbird.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decid
401 - 500 of 2355 matches
Mail list logo
