Re: Another No devices found in X problem

2011-02-27 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Sunday 27 Feb 2011, Camaleón wrote: I wonder what is the current status for Sandy Bridge in current Debian releases :-? I've read that Intel X driver 2.14.0 does fully support that chipset (H67) but you seem to be using 2.13.0 and Xorg 1.7.7. Will that combo work? Greetings, Oh, I

Another No devices found in X problem

2011-02-26 Thread Steve McCarthy
Hello, I followed this topic in December when Celejar was having difficulty, but that solution doesn't help me. I recently bought a motherboard w/ H67 chip-set and i5 processor. I managed to purchase it 8 hours before the Intel recall was announced - lucky me. Xorg seems determined to

Re: Any kmail filtering advice?

2010-12-27 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Friday 24 Dec 2010, Chris Davies wrote: To do this is straightforward if somewhat fiddly. - Enable junk/spam processing (I assume KMail can do this) - Create a filter for each of the known shops and mailing lists Yes, I think this is essentially the Thunderbird approach. Each acceptable

Re: Any kmail filtering advice?

2010-12-27 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Monday 27 Dec 2010, Camaleón wrote: Hum... maybe you are looking for a way of telling Kmail that e-mails coming from selected users (in address book or by manually selection) is ham (and never tagged as spam, kinda whitelisting in SA parlance). This should be easy to achieve by using

Any kmail filtering advice?

2010-12-23 Thread Steve McCarthy
My GF's disk died and it seemed a perfect time to introduce her to linux/gnu and kde as a msft substitute. I was sadly mistaken. I chose kmail as a substitute for her thunderbird for several reasons. My problem now is duplicating one of thunderbird/ice owl’s features: junk mail control.

Re: Any kmail filtering advice?

2010-12-23 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Thursday 23 Dec 2010, Lisi wrote: On Thursday 23 December 2010 21:48:26 Steve McCarthy wrote: Has anyone else found a way to defer junk (not SPAM) mail in kmail? It can use Spamassassin. (It can integrate it.) But I don't understand the distinction between Spam and Junk. To which

Re: Is a Universal Desktop Experience possible?

2009-07-11 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Friday 10 July 2009, Rob Owens wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:24:03PM -0700, SteveM wrote: What I'd like is a Universal Desktop Experience, i.e. same kicker applets, same konsole profiles, same amarok playlists, same xpad postits, etc, whereever I login. I'm a KDE type, but afaict

Re: Is a Universal Desktop Experience possible?

2009-07-11 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Saturday 11 July 2009, Rob Owens wrote: I typically use Fluxbox and Gnome (and a little LXDE). I haven't used KDE in years, so I can't comment on it specifically. I also haven't NFS mounted /home in quite a while. I remember when I did it that different versions of Gnome caused me grief.

Re: Is a Universal Desktop Experience possible?

2009-07-11 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Saturday 11 July 2009, Mike Castle wrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 5:13 AM, John Haslerjhas...@debian.org wrote: Instead of launching FF directly, I launch a wrapper with picks a different profile based on the machine name (and whether it's under VNC or not). I keep one profile as the

Re: Is a Universal Desktop Experience possible?

2009-07-11 Thread Steve McCarthy
On Saturday 11 July 2009, lee wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:24:03PM -0700, SteveM wrote: What I'd like is a Universal Desktop Experience, i.e. same kicker applets, same konsole profiles, same amarok playlists, same xpad postits, etc, whereever I login. I'm a KDE type, but afaict the