to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Difference is, the Benz 1930 guzzled gas like there was no tomorrow and
> was slow and uncomfortable.
>
> Lprng uses up way less resources than CUPS, is easier to set up and
> understand, and Just Works.
>
It is your opinion, I do not want to argue. For me it is as
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 07:19:13PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 06:38:46PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
around 1998 you could already print with other tools than lpr or lprng.
Until now, I was not aware that an "lpr" system still is in the Debian
archive. I am running
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 06:31:57PM +, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 07:19:13PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 06:38:46PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> >>around 1998 you could already print with other tools than lpr or lprng.
>
> Until now, I was not
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 06:38:46PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
[...]
> around 1998 you could already print with other tools than lpr or lprng.
> When I listen to you guys I have a respect, but you must understand that
> time goes on - this is like advertising Mercedes Benz from 1930 and telling
> me
4 matches
Mail list logo
