Re: (OT) Re: Godel

2004-01-08 Thread Micha Feigin
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:38:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 01:25:09AM -0800, Tom wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:11:39AM +0100, Nicos Gollan wrote: > > > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:00:05 -0800 > > > Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Once somebody disp

Re: (OT) Re: Godel

2004-01-08 Thread hendrik
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 01:25:09AM -0800, Tom wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:11:39AM +0100, Nicos Gollan wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:00:05 -0800 > > Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Once somebody disproves Godel I will rest easy... > > > > The one(s) doing this wouldn't survive

Re: (OT) Re: Godel

2003-11-30 Thread Tom
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:11:39AM +0100, Nicos Gollan wrote: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:00:05 -0800 > Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Once somebody disproves Godel I will rest easy... > > The one(s) doing this wouldn't survive the lynching parties the > theoreticians would start, and AFAIK, t

(OT) Re: Godel

2003-11-30 Thread Nicos Gollan
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:00:05 -0800 Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Once somebody disproves Godel I will rest easy... The one(s) doing this wouldn't survive the lynching parties the theoreticians would start, and AFAIK, the Goedel stuff is rather well proven. So don't hold your breath. -- Got B