On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:54:03PM +, Hugh Saunders wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:46:41PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
# aptitude install bleh
Yeah, i figured that but then i thought why not apt-get!!
Aptitude is smarter in same ways, for a start, but the bigger reason is
that aptitude
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:46:28PM +, Hugh Saunders wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:20:25PM +, iain d broadfoot wrote:
- Forwarded message from Hugh Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:57:15 +
From: Hugh Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: iain d
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:46:41PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
# aptitude install bleh
Yeah, i figured that but then i thought why not apt-get!!
Would still be good to be able to sync the aptitude package status with
the actual package status, is this possible?
hugh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
- Forwarded message from Hugh Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:57:15 +
From: Hugh Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: iain d broadfoot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-SpamProbe:
Subject: Re: Quick aptitude question...
X-CIS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:20:25PM +, iain d broadfoot wrote:
- Forwarded message from Hugh Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:57:15 +
From: Hugh Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: iain d broadfoot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-SpamProbe:
* Hugh Saunders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
not avoiding woodyr1 but i dont have fast connection [56k dialup] so i
want to aptiutude to install what i select and its dependencies [nothing
else- bit like apt-get install -which is what i end up using!] but as
ive fiddled about with it, aptitude
6 matches
Mail list logo
