Re: (should be) simple bind problem [possibly solved]

2015-05-27 Thread Bob Proulx
Glenn English wrote: apparmor. Ah! I would not have thought of that one. In the recent Debians (Wheezy++, I think), there is a directory /etc/apparmor.d. In there is a file called user.sbin.named. That Yes. But it isn't enabled by default. On a recently installed Debian Jessie 8 system:

Re: (should be) simple bind problem [solved]

2015-05-27 Thread Glenn English
On May 26, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Glenn English g...@slsware.net wrote: apparmor. No permission probs in the log this morning. Thanks much to those with suggestions. -- Glenn English -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: (should be) simple bind problem [possibly solved]

2015-05-27 Thread Glenn English
On May 27, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote: Ah! I would not have thought of that one. I didn't consider apparmor either. Saw a mention of it on an Ubuntu site. Yes. But it isn't enabled by default. I really don't think it is either. But simply renaming that file in

Re: (should be) simple bind problem [possibly solved]

2015-05-26 Thread Glenn English
apparmor. In the recent Debians (Wheezy++, I think), there is a directory /etc/apparmor.d. In there is a file called user.sbin.named. That file does various things to the /var/cache/bind directory. I didn't look at it long enough to figure out just what it does, and I couldn't find apparmor on

Re: (should be) simple bind problem

2015-05-26 Thread Glenn English
On May 25, 2015, at 1:00 AM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote: Glenn English wrote: root@srv:~# ps -ef | grep named bind 2098 1 0 May10 ?00:00:36 /usr/sbin/named -u bind root 10498 1 0 May10 ?00:00:50 /usr/sbin/named -c /etc/bind/named.conf There are

Re: (should be) simple bind problem

2015-05-25 Thread Bob Proulx
Glenn English wrote: root@srv:~# ps -ef | grep named bind 2098 1 0 May10 ?00:00:36 /usr/sbin/named -u bind root 10498 1 0 May10 ?00:00:50 /usr/sbin/named -c /etc/bind/named.conf There are two of them running? That doesn't seem right. The first one looks

Re: (should be) simple bind problem

2015-05-25 Thread Glenn English
On May 25, 2015, at 1:00 AM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote: Glenn English wrote: root@srv:~# ps -ef | grep named bind 2098 1 0 May10 ?00:00:36 /usr/sbin/named -u bind root 10498 1 0 May10 ?00:00:50 /usr/sbin/named -c /etc/bind/named.conf There are

Re: (should be) simple bind problem

2015-05-24 Thread Glenn English
Bob Proulx sent me a number of suggestions, and I tested them. Then I inadvertently replied to him instead of the list. Sorry, Bob, and thanks for the ideas. On May 21, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote: The first reason that comes to mind for permission denied is that it

Re: (should be) simple bind problem

2015-05-21 Thread Bob Proulx
Glenn English wrote: I'm getting (and have been for a while) log entries from my slave nameservers like: dumping master file: /var/cache/bind/tmp-0EIP3LrP0G: open: permission denied ... drwxrwxr-x 2 bind bind 4096 May 21 10:09 /var/cache/bind/ Good. Any ideas? The first reason that

(should be) simple bind problem

2015-05-21 Thread Glenn English
I'm getting (and have been for a while) log entries from my slave nameservers like: dumping master file: /var/cache/bind/tmp-0EIP3LrP0G: open: permission denied I also see problems with updating modification times of incoming files from masters. Debian Wheezy, Bind9 There are hundreds of