Glenn English wrote:
apparmor.
Ah! I would not have thought of that one.
In the recent Debians (Wheezy++, I think), there is a directory
/etc/apparmor.d. In there is a file called user.sbin.named. That
Yes. But it isn't enabled by default. On a recently installed Debian
Jessie 8 system:
On May 26, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Glenn English g...@slsware.net wrote:
apparmor.
No permission probs in the log this morning. Thanks much to those with
suggestions.
--
Glenn English
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On May 27, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Ah! I would not have thought of that one.
I didn't consider apparmor either. Saw a mention of it on an Ubuntu site.
Yes. But it isn't enabled by default.
I really don't think it is either. But simply renaming that file in
apparmor.
In the recent Debians (Wheezy++, I think), there is a directory
/etc/apparmor.d. In there is a file called user.sbin.named. That file does
various things to the /var/cache/bind directory. I didn't look at it long
enough to figure out just what it does, and I couldn't find apparmor on
On May 25, 2015, at 1:00 AM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Glenn English wrote:
root@srv:~# ps -ef | grep named
bind 2098 1 0 May10 ?00:00:36 /usr/sbin/named -u bind
root 10498 1 0 May10 ?00:00:50 /usr/sbin/named -c
/etc/bind/named.conf
There are
Glenn English wrote:
root@srv:~# ps -ef | grep named
bind 2098 1 0 May10 ?00:00:36 /usr/sbin/named -u bind
root 10498 1 0 May10 ?00:00:50 /usr/sbin/named -c
/etc/bind/named.conf
There are two of them running? That doesn't seem right. The first
one looks
On May 25, 2015, at 1:00 AM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Glenn English wrote:
root@srv:~# ps -ef | grep named
bind 2098 1 0 May10 ?00:00:36 /usr/sbin/named -u bind
root 10498 1 0 May10 ?00:00:50 /usr/sbin/named -c
/etc/bind/named.conf
There are
Bob Proulx sent me a number of suggestions, and I tested them. Then I
inadvertently replied to him instead of the list.
Sorry, Bob, and thanks for the ideas.
On May 21, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
The first reason that comes to mind for permission denied is that it
Glenn English wrote:
I'm getting (and have been for a while) log entries from my slave
nameservers like:
dumping master file: /var/cache/bind/tmp-0EIP3LrP0G: open: permission
denied
...
drwxrwxr-x 2 bind bind 4096 May 21 10:09 /var/cache/bind/
Good.
Any ideas?
The first reason that
I'm getting (and have been for a while) log entries from my slave nameservers
like:
dumping master file: /var/cache/bind/tmp-0EIP3LrP0G: open: permission denied
I also see problems with updating modification times of incoming files from
masters.
Debian Wheezy, Bind9
There are hundreds of
10 matches
Mail list logo