-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 03 March 2001 9:35 am, Matthias Wieser wrote:
2Q:
In what package can I find fuser?
psmisc
in What package can I find lsof?
lsof-2.2
HTH
('apt-cache search commandname' generally will give you some hints as to
which packages
Greetings,
My root filesystem suddenly shows 100% usage even though there's almost
nothing there...df shows its 100% but I am sure it's not...I tried to move
and even delete, uninstall some files, applications to check if the usage
somehow goes down...it doesn't..du doesn't show anything
hi ya jd...
whats teh rest of your partitions looking like ??
post the results of df
use du and see if you see anything odd
du /root
du /lib
du /proc
du /boot
du /dev
du /etc
du / all the root stuff ...
du /home is
jdls wrote:
Greetings,
My root filesystem suddenly shows 100% usage even though there's almost
nothing there...df shows its 100% but I am sure it's not...I tried to move
and even delete, uninstall some files, applications to check if the usage
somehow goes down...it doesn't..du
on Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:15:00AM -0800, jdls ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Greetings,
My root filesystem suddenly shows 100% usage even though there's almost
nothing there...df shows its 100% but I am sure it's not...I tried to move
and even delete, uninstall some files, applications to check
2Q:
In what package can I find fuser?
in What package can I find lsof?
Thank you - mattHias
/**
*Hiaslboy*
* alias Matthias Wieser *
*Kreuzgasse 20/15*
* A
Try as root:
find / -xdev -type f -print0 | xargs -0 ls -s | sort -nr | less
And you will see all files sorted by size (in blocks, bigest first) on
your root partition...
Martin
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, jdls wrote:
Greetings,
My root filesystem suddenly shows 100% usage even though there's
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:23:02AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
***NEVER*** delete large files on an impacted filesystem, *unless* you
first zero them out, *and* insure nothing's accessing them:
Isn't that a flaw in the system then? I can understand if a process still
has the file
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:23:02AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
***NEVER*** delete large files on an impacted filesystem, *unless* you
first zero them out, *and* insure nothing's accessing them:
Isn't that a flaw in the system then?
No, it's a
on Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:26:44AM -0800, Brian Frederick Kimball ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
...
kmself's point is that the file isn't deleted until the process stops
using it. If you rm the file first, you won't know which process is
keeping the disk space
kmself == kmself kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
kmself Not strictly. You can track things down through lsof or
kmself the /proc filesystem, but it's hard to work out what files
kmself are then accounting for large amounts of disk utilization.
kmself In other words -- it's a hell
on Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 10:35:06AM +0100, Matthias Wieser ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
2Q:
In what package can I find fuser?
in What package can I find lsof?
$ apt-cache search lsof
lsof-2.2 - List open files.
lsof-2.0.36 - List open files.
$ apt-cache search fuser
psmisc
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:27:04PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
on Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:26:44AM -0800, Brian Frederick Kimball ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
...
kmself's point is that the file isn't deleted until the process stops
using it. If you rm
13 matches
Mail list logo
