with stable r 6
installed. I need to add a correct route command. I assume I'd add it
to an init.d script.
grep route /etc/init.d/*
turns up nothing. I have a /etc/init.d/networking file (se list of all
init.d files below) but no /etc/init.d/network. The debian-guide
certainly makes it sound as if i
I've discovered the /etc/network/interfaces file -- I think I should
fix things there.
yes, that is the correct location now
Side Note:
If /etc/init.d/network has been discontinued and the functionality
moved to /etc/network/interfaces, perhaps someone should update Debian
Guide
nicht, auch keine
/etc/init.d/network die IMHO bei Debian doch die /etc/route.conf
ersetzen sollte! Oder hab ich da etwa was falsch verstanden?
hmm - es gibt /etc/networks (Datei: Inhalt bei mir localnet
192.168.0.0)
und auch /etc/network (Ordner)
und in /etc/init.d habe ich mit network /etc
Hi,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Karin Gerbrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2002 20:55
An: Debian-User-De
Betreff: DHCP: /etc/route.conf oder /etc/init.d/network ?
Hallo Liste!
Ich möchte meinen Woody jetzt auch als DHCP-Server einsetzen
Michael Tuschik schrieb:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Karin Gerbrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2002 20:55
An: Debian-User-De
Betreff: DHCP: /etc/route.conf oder /etc/init.d/network ?
Kann deine komische Software keine Einleitungszeile
Kann deine komische Software keine Einleitungszeile
erzeugen? Vielleicht
hilft ja ein Update. :-/
Wenn Du mit komischer Software mein Outlook meinst, da hilft nix, nur
deinstallieren ...
... und genau das hab ich vor ;o)
Stand da auch, wofür das gut sein soll ? Bei mir läuft ein
DHCP-Server
Kann deine komische Software keine Einleitungszeile
erzeugen? Vielleicht
hilft ja ein Update. :-/
Wenn Du mit komischer Software mein Outlook meinst, da hilft nix, nur
deinstallieren ...
Damit war ich wohl gemeint. 8|
Stand da auch, wofür das gut sein soll ? Bei mir läuft ein
- Original Message -
From: Karin Gerbrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Walter Saner [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 5:08 PM
Subject: RE: DHCP: /etc/route.conf oder /etc/init.d/network ?
Stand da auch, wofür das gut sein soll ? Bei mir läuft ein
DHCP
Hallo Michael!
!SORRY!
^
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tuschik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 5:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: DHCP: /etc/route.conf oder /etc/init.d/network ?
Kann deine komische Software keine Einleitungszeile
erzeugen
Hallo Karin, hallo Johannes,
Ich möchte meinen Woody jetzt auch als DHCP-Server einsetzen.
ich habe in meinem Netz nur statische IPs, aber...
hmm - es gibt /etc/networks (Datei: Inhalt bei mir localnet 192.168.0.0)
und auch /etc/network (Ordner)
und in /etc/init.d habe ich mit network
Hallo Karin,
Hallo Liste,
ich benutze kein dhcp für die Adressvergabe, habe aber trozdem eine
Idee wie Du Dein Problem schnell und unkompliziert lösen kannst:
Du könntest einfach ein eigens script erstellen was den Befehl:
route add -host 255.255.255.255 dev eth0
ausführt, und dieses
ein fröhliches 'Hallo Andreas'!
-Original Message-
From: andreas well [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 8:45 PM
To: Karin Gerbrich
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /etc/route.conf oder /etc/init.d/network ?
Du könntest einfach ein eigens script
- Original Message -
From: Karin Gerbrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: andreas well [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:03 PM
Subject: RE: /etc/route.conf oder /etc/init.d/network ?
-Original Message-
From: andreas well [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Markus
-Original Message-
From: Markus Kolb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /etc/route.conf oder /etc/init.d/network ?
Mmh, mich würde aber trotzdem interessieren, wieso nun manche diese
route brauchen und
folgendes dazuschreiben:
255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 eth0
Uuups, die /etc/route.conf gibts bei mir nicht, auch keine
/etc/init.d/network die IMHO bei Debian doch die /etc/route.conf
ersetzen sollte! Oder hab ich da etwa was falsch verstanden?
--
Liebe Grüße aus Wien
Karin
http
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 03:01:05PM -0500, will trillich ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 06:26:47PM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Could someone set me straight on the distinction between
/etc/init.d/network and the definition files under /etc/network:
interfaces
Quoth kmself@ix.netcom.com,
So -- should I configure /etc/network/interfaces, delete
/etc/init.d/network, and pray everything works from
/etc/init.d/networking?
I had a machine which somehow managed to get assigned a wrong default
gateway, which was causing me all sorts of grief. I eventually
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 06:26:47PM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Could someone set me straight on the distinction between
/etc/init.d/network and the definition files under /etc/network:
interfaces, options, and spoof-protect.
We've got a balky server which doesn't like coming on-line
Could someone set me straight on the distinction between
/etc/init.d/network and the definition files under /etc/network:
interfaces, options, and spoof-protect.
We've got a balky server which doesn't like coming on-line (and
occasionally likes going off) when it boots. I suspect multiple
In potato's netbase, the network script has been replaced by
networking. In an upgrade from slink the old script and its symlinks
in /etc/rc*.d are retained, however. While this still works, is it
likely to cause compatibility problems in the future (woody and
beyond)?
Bob
--
Bob Nielsen,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 11:18:06AM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
In potato's netbase, the network script has been replaced by
networking. In an upgrade from slink the old script and its symlinks
in /etc/rc*.d are retained, however. While this still works, is it
likely to cause compatibility
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 08:04:26PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
I didn't like Netscrape for mail -
Nor do I, however ...
it word wraps in the wrong places
and to put mail in separate folders you've either got to monkey
around with `procmail' or endlessly drag and drop from Inbox to
Actually it's not hard in netscape to perform filtering.
If whateverbitofmsg (eg to, sender etc) contains blah then move to
folder (or whatever action you want.)
Word wrap is in Edit/Preferences/Mail and Newsgroups/Messages/Message
Wrapping
Peter.
Mike Werner wrote:
... this is not true.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ethan Benson) writes:
[...]
the only MUA for *nix that includes an MTA is bloatscape
communicator.
Or you can look at xfmail. I've used it a long time (but now I'm using
gnus), and it's easy to setup. Inlucdes code for POP3 and IMAP, can
talk SMTP.
Burkhard
Thanks to all for the MUA advice. I can see that I'm going to have to learn
some new things (again), like MTAs. Linux has an amazing ability to laugh at
your years as a computer professional make you feel like an idiot.
But that's what's so [EMAIL PROTECTED] great about it.
Friday, May 19, 2000, 9:04:17 AM, A. wrote:
Thanks to all for the MUA advice. I can see that I'm going to have to learn
some new things (again), like MTAs. Linux has an amazing ability to laugh at
your years as a computer professional make you feel like an idiot.
Actually I'd not do that.
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pardon my ignorance. I had no idea that any mechanism for tracking
threads
existed other than the subject line. I'll keep that in mind.
=20
Incidentally, how exactly does thread tracking work? I assume there is a
header of
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 10:13:51PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pardon my ignorance. I had no idea that any mechanism for tracking
threads
existed other than the subject line. I'll keep that in mind.
=20
Incidentally,
Ethan Benson wrote:
that is because outlook is broken and does not understand
RFC2015.
What Linux MUA should I use. I'd like one that has a complete feature set
and doesn't rely on X (I don't like X).
Also, most of the MUA's I've looked at don't clearly define a way to specify
checking a
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 11:28:15AM -0500, A. Scott White wrote:
Ethan Benson wrote:
that is because outlook is broken and does not understand
RFC2015.
What Linux MUA should I use. I'd like one that has a complete feature set
and doesn't rely on X (I don't like X).
if you don't like X you
A == A Scott White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A Ethan Benson wrote:
that is because outlook is broken and does not understand
RFC2015.
A What Linux MUA should I use. I'd like one that has a complete feature set
A and doesn't rely on X (I don't like X).
Gnus in XEmacs is
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ethan the only MUA for *nix that includes an MTA is bloatscape
Ethan communicator.
It's better to install a MTA, like `exim', `postfix', or `sendmail'.
You can set it up so it doesn't accept connections from the net if
you like.
I
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 01:38:19PM +1000, Matthew Dalton wrote:
A. Scott White wrote:
Can anyone tell me exactly what this line accomplishes:
[ ${GATEWAY} ] route add default gw ${GATEWAY} metric 1
if the $GATEWAY variable has been set, run the command 'route add
default gw
Ethan:
to the original poster, reply change subject != new message
...
the former screws up threading in mailing list archives and in
MUAs such as mutt. please always create a new message and paste
the list address in instead of using reply as a shortcut, or if
you post often create an
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 09:14:17AM -0500, A. Scott White wrote:
Ethan:
to the original poster, reply change subject != new message
...
the former screws up threading in mailing list archives and in
MUAs such as mutt. please always create a new message and paste
the list address in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
A. Scott White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Incidentally, how exactly does thread tracking work? I assume there is a
header of some kind. Maybe I'll hack it out. Interesting.
The In-Reply-To: header field has the message-id of the article you're
Can anyone tell me exactly what this line accomplishes:
[ ${GATEWAY} ] route add default gw ${GATEWAY} metric 1
I'm pretty sure it adds the default gateway setting for TCP/IP, but I don't
understand what it means, exactly. Could you explain:
1. The script syntax
2. the commands involved
I'd
A. Scott White wrote:
Can anyone tell me exactly what this line accomplishes:
[ ${GATEWAY} ] route add default gw ${GATEWAY} metric 1
if the $GATEWAY variable has been set, run the command 'route add
default gw ${GATEWAY} metric 1.
The [ and ] are synonyms for the 'test' program. In
, see the manual pages for `[' (or `test'), `bash' (or your
particular shell) and `route'.
Andreas
-Original Message-
From: A. Scott White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 11:05
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Help with the /etc/init.d/network
Can
I just installed a Debian 2.1 stable machine.
Since it has a Token Ring adapter I skipped the configure the network
step during installation.
I have recompiled a kernel 2.2.13 and have tr0.
My /etc/init.d is missing the network script ... is there a source from
which I could get it/create it ???
found at the link below. It explains most
everything you need to know including what's needed for 2.2.X vs 2.0.X
kernels.
http://www.tor.shaw.wave.ca/~ambrose/ipmasq-HOWTO.html#toc3
As a simple example, here's my /etc/init.d/network for the gateway
machine on a 2 computer home network. I'm using
So that my computer will apply the ipchains commands, the ipforward
command in echo, the ifconfig, etc... at boot?
NatePuri
Certified Law Student
Debian GNU/Linux Monk
McGeorge School of Law
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ompages.com
What package sets up /etc/init.d/network ?
After a new install on a laptop (for which I might have replied that there
was no network for some configuration question), I'm left without even a
loopback configured. I could hack it in myself, but...
--
Peter Galbraith, research scientist
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What package sets up /etc/init.d/network ?
Only a new installation configures it in the setup.
After a new install on a laptop (for which I might have replied that there
was no network for some configuration question), I'm
/init.d/network is run (I know this is true
because I added some echo statements watched the screen while it booted.)
Anyway, after I boot the eth0 interface is not setup. If I run /etc/init.d/
network by hand afterwards, everything is fine. I've checked, double-
checked, and even had a friend check
Did you try sticking an ifconfig in at the end of /etc/init.d/network to
see if the interface is up at that particular moment?
Maybe something else is shutting it down somewhere else ???
Later,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user
On Thu, 13 Nov 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had two network cards in this machine: first, an HP 100VG PCI and
then an Eagle NE2000 ISA. Both exhibit the same problem. Which is...
Are you using them as modules or did you compile the drivers in?
Just a random guess..
I tried
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy all.
I've had two network cards in this machine: first, an HP 100VG PCI and
then an Eagle NE2000 ISA. Both exhibit the same problem. Which is...
When the system boots /etc/init.d/network is run (I know this is true
because I added some echo statements
.
If you still need help I would be happy to take a look at your files.
I've found a kludge - added a sym-link from /etc/rc?.d/S99network to
/etc/init.d/network.
I'm going to try one of the other suggestions I got about adding an
ifconfig to the end of /etc/init.d/network to see if the interface is
up
Well...
in the /etc/init.d/network file is the following lines inserted?
/sbin/ifconfig eth0 up
/sbin/ifconfig eth0 host_name netmask 255.255.255.0
Add the kernel routing table
/sbin/route add -net 198.168.1.0 dev eth0
/sbin/route add -host host_name dev eth0
Here's my /etc
On Thu, 13 Nov 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the system boots /etc/init.d/network is run (I know this is true
because I added some echo statements watched the screen while it booted.)
Anyway, after I boot the eth0 interface is not setup. If I run /etc/init.d/
network by hand afterwards
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Thursday, November 13, 1997 7:19 AM
Subject: /etc/init.d/network
Howdy all.
I've got one machine that's really got me stumped. I've been with
Debian since
On 13-Nov-97 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
When the system boots /etc/init.d/network is run (I know this is true
because I added some echo statements watched the screen while it booted.)
Anyway, after I boot the eth0 interface is not setup. If I run /etc/init.d/
network by hand afterwards
53 matches
Mail list logo
