limits in /etc/passwd, and maybe a bug in processing /etc/limits? :)

2000-01-13 Thread Jim B
matter what... and yes I have commented-out the umask field in /etc/profile, and there is none in the test user's .bash_profile, .profile, and .bashrc. :) Anyone know the right way to do it? My second problem... well, it looks like it may be a bug. Note the following text in /etc/limits:

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-11 Thread Marek Habersack
out to me that I can. :) My pleasure :) > One last thing... the original question also was, "how do slackware and > RedHat set the max vmem usage without using ulimit, /etc/limits, or PAM?" > Would you happen to know this off-hand? I thought maybe it was compiled > into th

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-11 Thread Jim B
the exploit, while none of the other ulimit options did. Therefore I thought I was unable to limit the max vmem using PAM. Thank you for pointing out to me that I can. :) One last thing... the original question also was, "how do slackware and RedHat set the max vmem usage without using

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-11 Thread Marek Habersack
* Jim B said: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Marek Habersack wrote: > > > He can't, true. But shell-based limits aren't particularily good way of > > setting > > limits. They are by definition bound to one kind of shell - csh or bash or > > whatever. In case you, or the user, decideds to change his shell

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-11 Thread Jim B
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Marek Habersack wrote: > He can't, true. But shell-based limits aren't particularily good way of > setting > limits. They are by definition bound to one kind of shell - csh or bash or > whatever. In case you, or the user, decideds to change his shell, you loose > all the limi

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-11 Thread Marek Habersack
* Jim B said: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Ethan Benson wrote: > > > ulimit does not really protect at all against someone malicious since > > they are perfectly free to un-ulimit themselves, this is where > > pam_limits is helpful, it enforces the hard limit and it cannot be > > ulimited past that.

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-11 Thread Marek Habersack
* Ethan Benson said: > > > >Also: I still don't know of any way to set the Virtual Mem usage of a > >shell without using ulimit (bash) or limit (csh)! Note that it does not > >appear to be an option in /etc/limits or in pam's limits.conf. Anyone > >

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-11 Thread Ethan Benson
On 10/1/2000 Jim B wrote: $ ulimit -v unlimited $ ulimit -v 32767 $ ulimit -v 32767 $ ulimit -v 32768 bash: ulimit: cannot modify limit: Operation not permitted OTOH if you're talking about someone who switches his shell to get around the limits, that's my whole point. I need to know how to

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-11 Thread Jim B
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Ethan Benson wrote: > ulimit does not really protect at all against someone malicious since > they are perfectly free to un-ulimit themselves, this is where > pam_limits is helpful, it enforces the hard limit and it cannot be > ulimited past that. Hmmm. How would a user "

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-11 Thread Ethan Benson
On 10/1/2000 Jim B wrote: Then (in /etc/limits) I set "no limits" on my own accounts: - I would actually want to keep at least some of the limits on my own account as well, just to prevent a runaway process from causing problems, that is why i am interested in limits so reasona

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-10 Thread Jim B
optional "default" in /etc/limits, and what I found from the aforementioned machine. The defaults in /etc/limits are: #* L2 D6144 R2048 S2048 U32 N32 F16384 T5 C0 However I set the max CPU time to 60 minutes (T60) and max open files to 64 (N64). I figured that any process spawned by a

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-10 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: /etc/limits Date: Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 07:26:19AM +0100 In reply to:Onno Ebbinge Quoting Onno Ebbinge([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >| At 06:34 PM 1/9/00 -0500, Jim B wrote: >| >OK another issue I'm having with setting resource limits. How can I >| [snip]

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-10 Thread Ethan Benson
On 10/1/2000 Jim B wrote: If you're running potato then you'd probably want to use PAM and /etc/security/limits.conf instead. Look at the files themselves to see how they are set up. I have figured out how to set these limits up well enough, but I have a related question, how can i set reaso

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-10 Thread Jim B
gt;OK another issue I'm having with setting resource limits. How can I > [snip] > >I look in my /etc/limits and see a way to restrict just about all those > [snip] > > Where can I find more info on /etc/limits ? > > Regards, > > Onno

Re: /etc/limits

2000-01-10 Thread Onno Ebbinge
At 06:34 PM 1/9/00 -0500, Jim B wrote: >OK another issue I'm having with setting resource limits. How can I [snip] >I look in my /etc/limits and see a way to restrict just about all those [snip] Where can I find more info on /etc/limits ? Regards, Onno

/etc/limits

2000-01-09 Thread Jim B
Yet, I can't figure out how those distros set the limits. Is it a compile-time option for /bin/login? I look in my /etc/limits and see a way to restrict just about all those resources *except* max virtual memory. How can I enforce this restriction? I know I could use limit in csh and ulimit

slink bug(?): /etc/limits permissions

1999-07-29 Thread Jim B
Hi all, please see this excerpt from the man page for /etc/limits: LIMITS(5) LIMITS(5) NAME limits - Resource limits definition DESCRIPTION The limits file (/etc/limits by default or LIMITS_FILE defined config.h) describes