On 2009-03-24 13:03 +0100, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 08:37:47AM -0700, shaul Karl wrote:
>>
>> dpkg (dpkg -l gcc-4.3) reports that 4.3.3-3 is installed.
>> The latest entry in /var/log/apt/term reports 4:4.3.3-2 were set up.
>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 03:56:22PM -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
> Debian has a sort of rule about ABIs. There can be two named "versions
> for the same package. For example, a kernel might be 2.6.xx-1 and
> 2.6.xx-6 at the same time, a little confusing. The -1 is the ABI, and
> if the ABI cha
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 08:37:47AM -0700, shaul Karl wrote:
>
> dpkg (dpkg -l gcc-4.3) reports that 4.3.3-3 is installed.
> The latest entry in /var/log/apt/term reports 4:4.3.3-2 were set up.
^^
typo?
> To ad
shaul Karl wrote:
dpkg (dpkg -l gcc-4.3) reports that 4.3.3-3 is installed.
The latest entry in /var/log/apt/term reports 4:4.3.3-2 was set up.
Which version do I have?
To add to my confusion, I seem to remember that the head of
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/changelog.Debian.gz pointed to
4.3.3-3 before
dpkg (dpkg -l gcc-4.3) reports that 4.3.3-3 is installed.
The latest entry in /var/log/apt/term reports 4:4.3.3-2 was set up.
Which version do I have?
To add to my confusion, I seem to remember that the head of
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/changelog.Debian.gz pointed to
4.3.3-3 before the mentioned entr
dpkg (dpkg -l gcc-4.3) reports that 4.3.3-3 is installed.
The latest entry in /var/log/apt/term reports 4:4.3.3-2 were set up.
To add to my confusion, I seem to remember that the head of
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/changelog.Debian.gz pointed to 4.3.3-3 before the
mentioned entry in var/log/apt/term.
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2000 13:55:08 -0600, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was crying out
> from somewhere
> about: Re: [*] about gcc
>
> lists> On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 04:38:32AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> lists> > you
On Sun, 6 Feb 2000 13:55:08 -0600, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was crying out from
somewhere
about: Re: [*] about gcc
lists> On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 04:38:32AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
lists> > you need to do
lists> >
lists> > gcc -lm
lists> >
lists>
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 04:38:32AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> you need to do
>
> gcc -lm
>
> to link the maths library.
>
> Don't ask me why.
Because the actual code for the sqrt function is in the math library,
and the math library isn't linked in by default.
--
finger for GPG publi
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 04:38:32 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> you need to do gcc -lm to link the maths library.
>
> Don't ask me why.
Because the linker and the preprocessor are independent programs involved in
the compile process. #include causes the compiler to know about the
prototypes (arg
On 7 Feb 2000 01:09:00 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) was crying
out from somewhere
about: [*] about gcc
maths> hello everybody:
maths>
maths> i am using debian 2.1r4, i install it use deselect's preselect
"scientific
maths> workstation". i found my
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 12:49:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello everybody:
>
> i am using debian 2.1r4, i install it use deselect's preselect "scientific
> workstation". i found my gcc doesn't allow me to use "sqrt", for example:
>
> this is a c file: a.c
>
> #include "stdio.h"
> #in
hello everybody:
i am using debian 2.1r4, i install it use deselect's preselect "scientific
workstation". i found my gcc doesn't allow me to use "sqrt", for example:
this is a c file: a.c
#include "stdio.h"
#include "math.h"
main(){
printf("%f\n",sqrt(2));
}
and execute "cc a.c"
i get:
/tmp/c
13 matches
Mail list logo
