Re: [CODE OF CONDUCT REMINDER - WAS Re: Re: Why did Norbert Preining (having maintained KDE) left Debian?]

2022-01-24 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:50:45AM -0800, RP wrote: > > > This whole thread has turned into a violation of the very first rule.  By that, I presume you are referring to "The mailing lists exist to foster the development and use of Debian. Non-constructive or off-topic messages, along with other

Re: [CODE OF CONDUCT REMINDER - WAS Re: Re: Why did Norbert Preining (having maintained KDE) left Debian?]

2022-01-24 Thread Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
On 2022-01-24 12:50, RP wrote: > On 1/24/22 09:33, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:55:25PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:44:52PM +0100, deloptes wrote: max wrote: > For comparison, RMS is publicly against singular "they", and

Re: [CODE OF CONDUCT REMINDER - WAS Re: Re: Why did Norbert Preining (having maintained KDE) left Debian?]

2022-01-24 Thread RP
On 1/24/22 09:33, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:55:25PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:44:52PM +0100, deloptes wrote: max wrote: For comparison, RMS is publicly against singular "they", and Debian developers voted not to censure him. https://

Re: [CODE OF CONDUCT REMINDER - WAS Re: Re: Why did Norbert Preining (having maintained KDE) left Debian?]

2022-01-24 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:55:25PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:44:52PM +0100, deloptes wrote: > > max wrote: > > > > > For comparison, RMS is publicly against singular "they", and Debian > > > developers voted not to censure him. > > > https://stallman.org/articles

[CODE OF CONDUCT REMINDER - WAS Re: Re: Why did Norbert Preining (having maintained KDE) left Debian?]

2022-01-24 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:44:52PM +0100, deloptes wrote: > max wrote: > > > For comparison, RMS is publicly against singular "they", and Debian > > developers voted not to censure him. > > https://stallman.org/articles/genderless-pronouns.html Seems like a double > > standard, but whatever. > >