lee wrote:
...
... You can still run emacs fine on the
console or in a terminal as you could 15--20 years ago, and you can use
the GUI frames if you like, even all at the same time --- or compile a
version that doesn't have X-support at all.
FYI: There's an "emacs23-nox" (no X11 dependency) pac
> (if (>= emacs-major-version 20)
> (menu-bar-mode -1))
I recommend testing (fboundp 'menu-bar-mode) instead.
> (if (>= emacs-major-version 21)
> (if window-system
> (tool-bar-mode -1)))
And here I recommend testing (fboundp 'tool-bar-mode) and calling the
function regardless of
Vincent Chen wrote:
> Since you've been using Emacs for the past 15 years, I hope you do
> realize you can disable all the GUI clutter by setting:
>
> (menu-bar-mode -1)
> (tool-bar-mode -1)
> (scroll-bar-mode -1)
>
> in your ~/.emacs (though I do keep the scroll bar around, easier to
> read than
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:25:53 +, T o n g wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:01:33 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> Time to look for an all purpose editor to replace emacs.
>>
>> And you want to drop it just because of a problem with your settings
>> not being honored? Have you report it?
>
> Does
I feel your pain. Have you ever tried: emacs -nw filename gtk is
plenty freaky enough even in a g.u.i. environment, having it invade
command line space through whichever proxy software is unreasonable. Two
possibilities beyond emacs might be jove and mg. On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, T o n
g wrote:
> O
T o n g writes:
> there is only one looks and feel, the Unix one. Over the years, emacs is
> moving towards Windows, I lost its xterm-like scroll bar years ago, now
> the whole Unix-like look and feel is gone. It's OK to woo the windows
> users, but to completely ignore the Unix users, that's
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 1:25 PM, T o n g wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:01:33 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> Time to look for an all purpose editor to replace emacs.
>>
>> And you want to drop it just because of a problem with your settings not
>> being honored? Have you report it?
>
> Does it mat
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:01:33 +, Camaleón wrote:
Time to look for an all purpose editor to replace emacs.
>
> And you want to drop it just because of a problem with your settings not
> being honored? Have you report it?
Does it matter? -- I started to use Emacs almost 15 years ago. By th
8 matches
Mail list logo
