On 7/29/20 06:03, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 07/29/2020 06:13 AM, Joe wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> I'd recommend using the right tool for the job.
>>
>
> Which is why I'll investigate.
> Your approach is literally orders of magnitude more than I want.
With respect, Joe is right, in my opinion based
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:51:06 -0400
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> On 7/30/20 5:21 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, 29 Jul 2020 at 04:40, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> On 07/27/2020 10:13 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> >>> You may wish to have a look at recutils:
> >> A database is over-kill
On 07/30/2020 09:51 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. Yogi Berra
On 7/30/20 5:21 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 Jul 2020 at 04:40, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 07/27/2020 10:13 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
You may wish to have a look at recutils:
A database is over-kill for some personal preferences.
I had mentioned spreadsheets in original post as I
On Thursday, 30 Jul 2020 at 06:15, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Does that sound at all like I saw anything in favor of SQL ? !
No but you said:
> IIRC, dBase was simpler.
so I suggested a simple FOSS database system. Like I said, no
worries. I obviously misunderstood what you were looking
On 07/30/2020 04:21 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 Jul 2020 at 04:40, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 07/27/2020 10:13 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
You may wish to have a look at recutils:
A database is over-kill for some personal preferences.
I had mentioned spreadsheets in original post as
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 01:09:15PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> On 2020-07-29 05:03, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> >[A suggested] approach is literally orders of magnitude more than I want.
>
>
> Consider these idealized cost functions for solution technologies A,
> B, and C:
>
> fA(t) =
On Wednesday, 29 Jul 2020 at 04:40, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 07/27/2020 10:13 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> You may wish to have a look at recutils:
>
> A database is over-kill for some personal preferences.
>
> I had mentioned spreadsheets in original post as I had visualized a
I am confused. You
On 2020-07-29 05:03, Richard Owlett wrote:
[A suggested] approach is literally orders of magnitude more than I want.
Consider these idealized cost functions for solution technologies A, B,
and C:
fA(t) = t*t + 1
fB(t) = (t/3)*(t/3) + 10
fC(t) = (t/10/*(t/10) + 100
Observe:
On 07/29/2020 06:13 AM, Joe wrote:
[snip]
I'd recommend using the right tool for the job.
Which is why I'll investigate.
Your approach is literally orders of magnitude more than I want.
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 04:40:24 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 07/27/2020 10:13 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> > You may wish to have a look at recutils:
> >
> > https://www.gnu.org/software/recutils/
> >
> > but it may not have some of the functionality you wish (although you
> > could build on it
On 2020-07-29 10:40, Richard Owlett wrote:
A database is over-kill for some personal preferences.
apropos of nothing I found this great, clear introduction to Perl/Tk for
inputting how many cups of coffee and bacon sandwiches you had.
On 07/27/2020 10:13 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
You may wish to have a look at recutils:
https://www.gnu.org/software/recutils/
but it may not have some of the functionality you wish (although you
could build on it with shell scripts & awk, say).
A database is over-kill for some personal
13 matches
Mail list logo
