Re: [OFF TOPIC] was: Segfault in free()...C++

1997-09-05 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
On Sep 4, 1997, at 09:10, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: Jeff Gunter: Wildly off topic, but a fun view into `commercial quality software', let me show you the output of CC under IRIX 64 with the following application: hw.cc:

Re: [OFF TOPIC] was: Segfault in free()...C++

1997-09-05 Thread Alex Yukhimets
On Sep 4, 1997, at 09:10, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: Jeff Gunter: Wildly off topic, but a fun view into `commercial quality software', let me show you the output of CC under IRIX 64 with the following application: hw.cc:

Re: [OFF TOPIC] was: Segfault in free()...C++

1997-09-05 Thread Gonzalo A. Diethelm
On Sep 5, 1997, at 10:16, E.L. Meijer \(Eric\) wrote: Well, remarks are just that: comments the compiler has regarding some non-standard, perhaps non-portable and not-so-secure assumptions you MAY have made in your code. You didn't look carefully enough, or you don't understand what

[OFF TOPIC] was: Segfault in free()...C++

1997-09-05 Thread Gonzalo A. Diethelm
On Sep 4, 1997, at 09:10, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: Jeff Gunter: Wildly off topic, but a fun view into `commercial quality software', let me show you the output of CC under IRIX 64 with the following application: hw.cc:

[OFF TOPIC] was: Segfault in free()...C++

1997-09-04 Thread E.L. Meijer (Eric)
Jeff Gunter: FWIW, I have also had problems with SGI's C++ compiler and g++ (on the same SGI) being incompatible. The incompatibilities are even to the level where code will compile cleanly under one compiler and not compile at all under the other. These two compilers are definitely not