Brian Marshall put forth on 10/14/2009 1:32 AM:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:33:28AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> I'm on T-Bird 2.0.0.23 (latest) and I don't have a reply-to-list option.
>> Is this something I have to set manually in about:config? Sure would
>> save me some time manually editin
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:33:28AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> I'm on T-Bird 2.0.0.23 (latest) and I don't have a reply-to-list option.
> Is this something I have to set manually in about:config? Sure would
> save me some time manually editing the recipient list with each reply.
It's only in T
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:12:04 -0500
Gaspar Núñez wrote:
> i apologize for not having started a new thread
> (i thouhgt i was doing that)
> i'll try to find out how (any direction is welcomed)
A new thread is started by simply composing and sending a mail to the
list address, not replying to an ex
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 08:03:50AM EDT, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On Ter, 13 Out 2009, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
>> 10/12/2009 03:44 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI:
>>> Thunderbird by default does not have that feature, even under Linux
>>
>> You are wrong.
>
> Really? Because all the Thunderbi
i apologize for not having started a new thread
(i thouhgt i was doing that)
i'll try to find out how (any direction is welcomed)
thanks for the tip to check goodby-microsoft
gaspar
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <
b...@iguanasuicide.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 Octo
Op Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:33:28 -0500 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> I'm on T-Bird 2.0.0.23 (latest) and I don't have a reply-to-list
> option. Is this something I have to set manually in about:config?
> Sure would save me some time manually editing the recipient list with
> each reply.
For T-Bird/Icedove th
I'm on T-Bird 2.0.0.23 (latest) and I don't have a reply-to-list option.
Is this something I have to set manually in about:config? Sure would
save me some time manually editing the recipient list with each reply.
--
Stan
Here it is: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/4455
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 17:44:22 Gaspar Núñez wrote:
> hi
>
> i´m trying to change from windows to a free OS
> and i'd like to try Debian
> however i´m having some problems to install it
> and the packages that i need to do my work
>
> right know i would appreciate some help on the following:
Celejar put forth on 10/13/2009 10:26 AM:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:01:23 -0500
> Dave Sherohman wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> better email client". I know mutt supports reply-to-list (I'm using
>> it right now) and I'm pretty sure I've seen people here saying that
>> Thunderbird supports it natively in t
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 10:44:22 Gaspar Núñez wrote:
> i´m trying to change from windows to a free OS
> and i'd like to try Debian
> however
>
> i've dowloaded several times dvds 1 and 2
> (debian-503-i386-DVD-1.iso and debian-503-i386-DVD-2.iso)
> but when i check the md5 sum the codes never ma
Dne, 13. 10. 2009 17:44:22 je Gaspar Núñez napisal(a):
> hi
>
> i´m trying to change from windows to a free OS
> and i'd like to try Debian
> however i´m having some problems to install it
> and the packages that i need to do my work
>
> right know i would appreciate some help on the following:
>
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:33:28 -0500
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Celejar put forth on 10/13/2009 10:26 AM:
> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:01:23 -0500
> > Dave Sherohman wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> better email client". I know mutt supports reply-to-list (I'm
> >> using it right now) and I'm pretty sure
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:44:22 -0500
Gaspar Núñez wrote:
> hi
>
> i´m trying to change from windows to a free OS
Please create a new thread for new questions, and don't start a new
topic by replying to an existing one with unrelated material.
Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access v
hi
i´m trying to change from windows to a free OS
and i'd like to try Debian
however i´m having some problems to install it
and the packages that i need to do my work
right know i would appreciate some help on the following:
i've dowloaded several times dvds 1 and 2
(debian-503-i386-DVD-1.iso an
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:01:23 -0500
Dave Sherohman wrote:
...
> better email client". I know mutt supports reply-to-list (I'm using
> it right now) and I'm pretty sure I've seen people here saying that
> Thunderbird supports it natively in the latest version (and with a
> plugin in earlier versi
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:10:40 -0700, Consultores in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
> El lun, 12-10-2009 a las 07:28 -0500, green escribió:
>> Paul E Condon wrote at 2009-10-11 22:27 -0500:
>> > I think your position is analogous to that of an American tourist in Paris
>> > who gets all bent out of
On Ter, 13 Out 2009, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
10/12/2009 03:44 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI:
Thunderbird by default does not have that feature, even under Linux
You are wrong.
Really? Because all the Thunderbirds/Icedoves I've used never had this
feature.
Thunderbird 3 is reported to h
10/12/2009 03:44 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI:
Thunderbird by default does not have that feature, even under Linux
You are wrong.
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement
+261 34 29 155 34
--
T
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:29:57PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> It is semi-on-topic for this list to discuss work-arounds for Debian-provided
> clients, most of which boil down to using Reply-To-All and then editing the
> To/Cc lines to match list policy.
Actually, I'd say that the maj
In <4ede8f490910122106s3b375edj982554f6a7b3b...@mail.gmail.com>, Vinicius
Massuchetto wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> Non-Debian lists do not behave this way. Choosing "reply" is set to
>> send an email back to the list - even on sun-managers where the policy
>> is to re
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Lisi wrote:
>> On Monday 12 October 2009 01:05:27 Mark Allums wrote:
[...]
> Non-Debian lists do not behave this way. Choosing "reply" is set to
> send an email back to the list - even on sun-managers where the p
El lun, 12-10-2009 a las 07:28 -0500, green escribió:
> Paul E Condon wrote at 2009-10-11 22:27 -0500:
> > I think your position is analogous to that of an American tourist in Paris
> > who gets all bent out of shape because everyone is talking in French and
> > pretending to understand each other.
I'm pretty late to this. I myself post though gmane so by default I only
reply to the list, technically gmane.linux.debian.user.
However, this being a users list, I think that a majority of opinions or
preference from users should dictate how the list works. Who holds the
gavel?
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Brian Marshall wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:03:42PM +0200, Tom H wrote:
>> In order to reply to the list, I choose "reply" and change the "to"
>> field to "debian-user...".
>> I assume that some people choose "reply to all" and it makes others
>> unnecessar
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:03:42PM +0200, Tom H wrote:
> In order to reply to the list, I choose "reply" and change the "to"
> field to "debian-user...".
>
> I assume that some people choose "reply to all" and it makes others
> unnecessarily angry about receiving two identical emails.
>
> Non-Deb
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Lisi wrote:
> On Monday 12 October 2009 15:03:42 Tom H wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Lisi wrote:
>>> On Monday 12 October 2009 01:05:27 Mark Allums wrote:
In this, I feel I'm in the majority, here, of people who feel Debian is
being a bit u
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:28:58 -0500, green in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
>
> --dXvu6+ixFx2ZffE8
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Paul E Condon wrote at 2009-10-11 22:27 -0500:
>> I think your position is analogous to that of an American tourist in Paris
On Monday 12 October 2009 15:03:42 Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Lisi wrote:
> > On Monday 12 October 2009 01:05:27 Mark Allums wrote:
> >> In this, I feel I'm in the majority, here, of people who feel Debian is
> >> being a bit unnecessarily stubborn.
> >
> > On what do you bas
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Lisi wrote:
> On Monday 12 October 2009 01:05:27 Mark Allums wrote:
>> In this, I feel I'm in the majority, here, of people who feel Debian is
>> being a bit unnecessarily stubborn.
> On what do you base this strange assertion? I would have said the reverse.
> S
Chris Jones wrote:
> I didn't follow this thread, so I'm not sure what you are referring to,
> but are you requesting debian amend their mailing list policy to
> accomodate M$ Windows users?
No, he's suggesting to use a Reply-To header pointing to the list
address to accommodate users running mail
Paul E Condon wrote at 2009-10-11 22:27 -0500:
> I think your position is analogous to that of an American tourist in Paris
> who gets all bent out of shape because everyone is talking in French and
> pretending to understand each other. ;-)
Great analogy!
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
On Monday 12 October 2009 01:05:27 Mark Allums wrote:
> In this, I feel I'm in the majority, here, of people who feel Debian is
> being a bit unnecessarily stubborn.
On what do you base this strange assertion? I would have said the reverse.
Some figures, please!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 20091011_190527, Mark Allums wrote:
> Chris Jones wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 07:28:29AM EDT, Mark Allums wrote:
>>
>>> The policy should be changed.
>>
>>> And don't tell me to use some Thunderbird extension of dubious
>>> provenance. I might not use Thunderbird, or I'm on Windows for ema
Chris Jones wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 07:28:29AM EDT, Mark Allums wrote:
The policy should be changed.
And don't tell me to use some Thunderbird extension of dubious
provenance. I might not use Thunderbird, or I'm on Windows for email
[..]
I didn't follow this thread, so I'm not sure
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 07:28:29AM EDT, Mark Allums wrote:
> The policy should be changed.
> And don't tell me to use some Thunderbird extension of dubious
> provenance. I might not use Thunderbird, or I'm on Windows for email
[..]
I didn't follow this thread, so I'm not sure what you are refer
35 matches
Mail list logo
