Erwan David wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:17:31AM CET, Tixy said:
>> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 22:29 +0100, Erwan David wrote:
>> > I'll try the latest davmail, now I use icedove in Imap (activated on
>> > exchange)
>>
>> I've used davmail for several weeks and it seems to work well, but as it
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:17:31AM CET, Tixy said:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 22:29 +0100, Erwan David wrote:
> > I'll try the latest davmail, now I use icedove in Imap (activated on
> > exchange)
>
> I've used davmail for several weeks and it seems to work well, but as it
> slurps data though the
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 22:29 +0100, Erwan David wrote:
> I'll try the latest davmail, now I use icedove in Imap (activated on
> exchange)
I've used davmail for several weeks and it seems to work well, but as it
slurps data though the outlook web interface email formatting is
different (though perf
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Erwan David wrote:
> On 18/01/11 22:22, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
>> On the 18/01/2011 18:13, deloptes wrote:
>>> ...
>> ...
> ...
> now I use icedove in Imap (activated on
> exchange), plus the exchange data provider for lightning
> (http://gitorious.org/lig
On 18/01/11 22:22, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On the 18/01/2011 18:13, deloptes wrote:
>>
>> Is someone (already) using Evolution 2.30 with squeeze with exchange server.
>> If yes for how long and what is your impression. Can it be considered to be
>> stable? Any data losses?
>>
>> What woul
On the 18/01/2011 18:13, deloptes wrote:
>
> Is someone (already) using Evolution 2.30 with squeeze with exchange server.
> If yes for how long and what is your impression. Can it be considered to be
> stable? Any data losses?
>
> What would be your advise to use? Which version of Evolution works
6 matches
Mail list logo
