[OT] less spam

Hi, After the shutdown of that server I get less spam. Others have noted that too: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/18/AR2008111801120.html?hpid=topnews Hugo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: [OT] less spam

Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hi, After the shutdown of that server I get less spam. Others have noted that too: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/18/AR2008111801120.html?hpid=topnews Hugo yep. A more graphical version of the result can be seen at

Re: [OT] less spam

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:06:36 -0500 Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hi, After the shutdown of that server I get less spam. Others have noted that too:

Re: [OT] less spam

On Wednesday 19 November 2008 06:27:08 Celejar wrote: On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:06:36 -0500 Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hi, After the shutdown of that server I get less spam. Others have noted that too:

Re: [OT] less spam

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:02:11 +0200 Clifford W. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... If only they could use all that energy and time for doing good instead, imagine how much better Debian/Linux would be if that energy was spent on bug fixes instead of sending spam... Can't argue with that.

Re: [OT] less spam

2008/11/19 Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:02:11 +0200 Clifford W. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... If only they could use all that energy and time for doing good instead, imagine how much better Debian/Linux would be if that energy was spent on bug fixes instead of

Re: [OT] less spam

On 11/18/08 23:02, Clifford W. Hansen wrote: [snip] If only they could use all that energy and time for doing good instead, imagine how much better Debian/Linux would be if that energy was spent on bug fixes instead of sending spam... If only all the bad people would start doing good, what