Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Johann Spies wrote: I use mutt. From time to time I have experimented with things like kmail, pine, evolution, thunderbird (icedove), claws, gnus and maybe some others and every time I came back to mutt. Regards Johann I also like mutt. The base mutt has become much

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Johann Spies wrote: > I use mutt. From time to time I have experimented with things like kmail, > pine, evolution, > thunderbird (icedove), claws, gnus and maybe some others and every time I > came back to mutt. > > Regards > Johann I also like mutt. The base mutt has become much more valuable

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Hellow! No Spam 께서 쓰시길, 《記事 全文 <20160828210616.GC2923@jens-ThinkPad-Edge-E145> 에서》: > Hi, > > So it is 12 years later; > > has someone found something working? For now i use Gnus. by the way it is hard to recomend you. It is not easy to handle. The

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:35:12AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote: > I use mutt. From time to time I have experimented with things like kmail, > pine, evolution, > thunderbird (icedove), claws, gnus and maybe some others and every time I > came back to mutt. > +1 for mutt -H -- Henning Follmann

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Stefan writes: > ...offlineimap... That looks like it could be useful. Thank you. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

> sequentially. When you're on a metered internet connection, with only > a five-hour unmetered window in each 24, then making maximum use of > the unmetered window is important. In such a situation I think you'd want to use something like leafnode and offlineimap. Stefan

Re: Pulling mail for local access (was Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck)

On Monday 29 August 2016 07:29:16 The Wanderer wrote: > On 2016-08-29 at 07:00, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 06:15:23AM -0400, brian wrote: > > > > [Gnus] > > > >> But will it download from multiple newsfeeds

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Brian writes: > But will [Gnus] download from multiple newsfeeds *simultaneously*, and > combine the feeds if you subscribe to the same group from more than > one source? I use Leafnode to transfer news to my machine and then read it locally with Gnus. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Monday 29 August 2016 07:22:46 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, August 28, 2016 05:06:16 PM No Spam wrote: > > So it is 12 years later; > > > > has someone found something working? > > So, if you expect a helpful answer, you might detail the problems that > you have with the mail clients

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Brian writes: > I like having newsgroups and mail in a single program. So do I. That's one of the reasons I use Gnus, -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA

Pulling mail for local access (was Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck)

On 2016-08-29 at 07:00, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 06:15:23AM -0400, brian wrote: > > [Gnus] > >> But will it download from multiple newsfeeds *simultaneously*, and >> combine the feeds if you subscribe to the same group

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Sunday, August 28, 2016 05:06:16 PM No Spam wrote: > So it is 12 years later; > > has someone found something working? So, if you expect a helpful answer, you might detail the problems that you have with the mail clients you've tried. I've used kmail for a long time, and though it has some

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 06:15:23AM -0400, brian wrote: [Gnus] > But will it download from multiple newsfeeds *simultaneously*, and > combine the feeds if you subscribe to the same group from more than > one source? [...] TBH I never tried that,

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:11:51 +0200, you wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:59:04AM -0400, brian wrote: >> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:06:16 +0200, you wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >> >So it is 12 years later; >> > >> >has someone found something working? >> > >> >> This will be a recommendation which

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:59:04AM -0400, brian wrote: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:06:16 +0200, you wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >So it is 12 years later; > > > >has someone found something working? > > > > This will be a recommendation which most likely

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:06:16 +0200, you wrote: >Hi, > >So it is 12 years later; > >has someone found something working? > This will be a recommendation which most likely nobody else will support, but here we go... I like having newsgroups and mail in a single program. While there's nothing

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:06:16 +0200 No Spam wrote: > Hi, > > So it is 12 years later; > > has someone found something working? > Gmail on a web browser not good enough for you? OK, I'll vote for claws-mail as well, with the same reservation. It has

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Monday 29 August 2016 02:55:14 deloptes wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 29 August 2016 02:16:09 deloptes wrote: > >> Neal P. Murphy wrote: > >> > About the time of squeeze or wheezy, kmail (and KDE for that > >> > matter) began slipping over the edge into the abyss. I finally > >> >

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 29 August 2016 02:16:09 deloptes wrote: > >> Neal P. Murphy wrote: >> > About the time of squeeze or wheezy, kmail (and KDE for that matter) >> > began slipping over the edge into the abyss. I finally found XFCE >> > which is about as simple and is as useful as

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Monday 29 August 2016 02:16:09 deloptes wrote: > Neal P. Murphy wrote: > > About the time of squeeze or wheezy, kmail (and KDE for that matter) > > began slipping over the edge into the abyss. I finally found XFCE > > which is about as simple and is as useful as KDE3 was. > > KDE3 still lives

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

I use mutt. From time to time I have experimented with things like kmail, pine, evolution, thunderbird (icedove), claws, gnus and maybe some others and every time I came back to mutt. Regards Johann -- Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself, my lips will praise you.

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Neal P. Murphy wrote: > About the time of squeeze or wheezy, kmail (and KDE for that matter) began > slipping over the edge into the abyss. I finally found XFCE which is about > as simple and is as useful as KDE3 was. KDE3 still lives and KMail is still as usable as before ... even better as

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:06:16 +0200 No Spam wrote: > Hi, > > So it is 12 years later; > > has someone found something working? > > greets > > J More years ago, BeOS' email client was perfect for me. It use separate files and made very liberal use of

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

No Spam writes: > So it is 12 years later; To what event are you referring? Your message's header has no standard “In-Reply-To” field, so it apparently is not composed as a reply. > has someone found something working? I hope you can find an email

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Hi, So it is 12 years later; has someone found something working? greets J signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:28:10AM -0400, Cristian Gutierrez wrote: Brian Nelson wrote: [...] Furthermore, I ran into problems with offline synchronization. if you are using imap, there is zero syncrhonization problems, as your email and folders are only on the imap server Hmm?

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Brian Nelson wrote: [...] Furthermore, I ran into problems with offline synchronization. if you are using imap, there is zero syncrhonization problems, as your email and folders are only on the imap server Hmm? I don't use OfflineIMAP for shits and giggles, ya know. [...] I think I've

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 06:01:31 +0800, John Summerfield writes: mh But I'm not sure about IMAP support... in the past when I've wanted something like that I've been able to just mount the MH mail directory over the network, but there are Issues (to say the least) with trying to do that across the

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:24:34PM +0200, John L Fjellstad wrote: Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 6. It must have a decent expiry system. You don't need a mailclient to have a decent expiry system if you are using Maildir. Since all new mail goes into {MAILBOXNAME}/new and all

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 01:50:15AM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: } On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:24:34PM +0200, John L Fjellstad wrote: } Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: } }6. It must have a decent expiry system. } } You don't need a mailclient to have a decent expiry system if you

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 12:46, Gregory Seidman wrote: On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 01:50:15AM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: } On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:24:34PM +0200, John L Fjellstad wrote: } Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: }6. It must have a decent expiry system. } } You don't need

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 12:46:27PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote: On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 01:50:15AM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: } On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:24:34PM +0200, John L Fjellstad wrote: } Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: } }6. It must have a decent expiry system. }

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I use courier-imap-ssl, I haven't seen a problem yet. I even have a couple of folders with 15K+ messages and one with 23K+ messages. I also have 34 folders, 15 the have sub-folders from there, one sub-folder with 12 sub-folders in it. Can you set

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

FWIW... maybe my demands are just too small, but I've been using MH mail for... for hmmm... 25 years, now? maybe? and because it's command-line oriented, whenever it does something I don't like or doesn't do something I want, I write shell scripts to bludgeon it into submission as

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I'm not sure about IMAP support... in the past when I've wanted something like that I've been able to just mount the MH mail directory over the network, but there are Issues (to say the least) with trying to do that across the Internet... dep't. I think you have to

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 02:08:15PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there, I've been known to break security, implement an SUID shell script to hack the sendmail.cf file to change the system identity That doesn't do anything. SUID/GID bits on shell scripts are ignored. -- Thomas Adam --

scripts Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

hi ya list comm On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW... maybe my demands are just too small, but I've been using MH mail for... for hmmm... 25 years, now? maybe? and because it's command-line oriented, whenever it does something I there's a gui for mh too (Just to

Re: scripts Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

there's a gui for mh too Yes... thanks for reminding me, I was going to say something about that, for the benefit of whoever is bemoaning his mail system... it's exmh (formerly xmh), and is implemented AFAIK entirely in TCL, which can be customized to change the GUI (or blow it off the air and

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Downloading the contents of imap folders goes far to defeat the purpose of IMAP: I can read the same mail ising different IMAP clients on different computers and across different operating systems. Well, some of the mailers supposedly will Synchronize (yeah, right) your local folder image

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Downloading the contents of imap folders goes far to defeat the purpose of IMAP: I can read the same mail ising different IMAP clients on different computers and across different operating systems. Well, some of the mailers supposedly will Synchronize (yeah, right) your local folder image

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, some of the mailers supposedly will Synchronize (yeah, right) your local folder image with whatever is on the server, which would be nice if it worked, so you could conduct interactive stuff locally and just use the link for keeping stuff synchronized but,

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:01:52PM +0200, John L Fjellstad wrote: Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 6. It must have a decent expiry system. You don't need a mailclient to have a decent expiry system if you are using Maildir. Since all new mail goes into {MAILBOXNAME}/new and all

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 6. It must have a decent expiry system. You don't need a mailclient to have a decent expiry system if you are using Maildir. Since all new mail goes into {MAILBOXNAME}/new and all read mail goes into {MAILBOXNAME}/cur, you can use this script to

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why not just use an IMAP server that has one? Modify settings to taste. I use courier-imap-ssl, I haven't seen a problem yet. Didn't know courier-imap actually let you do autoexpire... Actually, right now I'm doing pop on my laptop. Won't be able to

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 6. It must have a decent expiry system. You don't need a mailclient to have a decent expiry system if you are using Maildir. Since all new mail goes into {MAILBOXNAME}/new and all read mail goes into {MAILBOXNAME}/cur, you can use this script to delete

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 06:01, John L Fjellstad wrote: Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 6. It must have a decent expiry system. You don't need a mailclient to have a decent expiry system if you are using Maildir. Since all new mail goes into {MAILBOXNAME}/new and all read mail goes

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 12:55:28PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: Paul Gear [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brian Nelson wrote: It's 2004. Email has been around for what, 30+ years? Is there an email client out there that, after 30 years, still doesn't suck? ... thunderbird? Never tried it,

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 21:18 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Brian Nelson wrote: [...] 7. It must not be dog slow. I have big folders and I don't want to wait 5 minutes to load them. Mutt suffers from 7, but it's not a big deal if you keep the number of messages in a folder under control. For

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 11:25 -0400, Mark Roach wrote: Have you used the imap headercache patch for mutt? I have used this on I should really read the whole thread before posting noise... and probably shouldn't have sent this one at all... -Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 04:16:35PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote: On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 12:55:28PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: Paul Gear [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brian Nelson wrote: It's 2004. Email has been around for what, 30+ years? Is there an email client out there that, after

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Brian Nelson wrote: ... mutt does that for me. I think gnus can also do, I mean to test it more heavily some time, but the startup time is too big. Must... resist... urge... to... KILL!!! http://palpatine.chez.tiscali.fr/Dilbert/CowDskArt040896.gif -- Paul http://paulgear.webhop.net --

[Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

It's 2004. Email has been around for what, 30+ years? Is there an email client out there that, after 30 years, still doesn't suck? That's a rhetorical question. Anyone who blurts out Mutt! gets a swift kick in the genitals. And if anyone even tries to utter gnus, I will beat them with a

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

hi ya nelson On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Brian Nelson wrote: It's 2004. Email has been around for what, 30+ years? Is there an email client out there that, after 30 years, still doesn't suck? it sucks because of different users like different functions/features/gui That's a rhetorical question.

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Brian Nelson wrote: It's 2004. Email has been around for what, 30+ years? Is there an email client out there that, after 30 years, still doesn't suck? ... thunderbird? Never tried it, doesn't support mailing lists from what I've heard. Most likely also suffers from the horrible editor

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Brian Nelson wrote: Hi Brian, understand your agony, haven't found the almighty email client, but am using Pine 4.58 quite happily: BN 1. I must be able to customize the order folders, and I don't want to BNgive them retardedly ugly names to force a correct alphabetic

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Despite the latency, offlineimap seemed to work OK from Brazil, so I decided to make gnus switch to using a local Maildir folder. Did you ever try using Gnus' agent support? In general, Gnus expects to control everything in its mail backends, so it's not

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Despite the latency, offlineimap seemed to work OK from Brazil, so I decided to make gnus switch to using a local Maildir folder. Did you ever try using Gnus' agent support? Yeah, that's what I meant by

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Alec Berryman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm going to get myself kicked in the nuts. I think mutt + offlineimap is what you need. Mutt does native Maildir support, so you won't have to screw with hard links or whatever that gnus stuff was. Just sync it up normally. Google for 'mutt header

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Paul Gear [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brian Nelson wrote: It's 2004. Email has been around for what, 30+ years? Is there an email client out there that, after 30 years, still doesn't suck? ... thunderbird? Never tried it, doesn't support mailing lists from what I've heard. Most likely

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Alvin Oga [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i assume you use different email accounts brian-deb for debian lists brian-movie for movie lists brian-security for security updates brian-work for work related lists brian-save for anything you want (forever) saved

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Over the years, my email usage has grown enormously. I now have 70 IMAP folders, am subscribed to around 50 mailing lists, and receive over 2000 emails per day. Perhaps not the answer you want, but have you considered reading the mailing lists through a

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Brian Nelson wrote: So now I'm seriously considering going back to mutt, but I just can't get into it. FWIW, my mail setup[1] has evolved to mutt+offlineimap (+vim+archivemail+cron+grepmail+maildrop+subversion) and I'm pretty happy with it. The weakest link is definitly mutt. I have a few

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In general, Gnus expects to control everything in its mail backends, so it's not surprising that it doesn't really sync with other maildir programs. nnmaildir tries (which is probably why it is so slow) but I don't think it's the highest on the list of

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brian Nelson wrote: I have a few modest requirements that a mail client must meet: 1. I must be able to customize the order folders, and I don't want to give them retardedly ugly names to force a correct alphabetic order. This is very important

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In general, Gnus expects to control everything in its mail backends, so it's not surprising that it doesn't really sync with other maildir programs. nnmaildir tries (which is probably why it is so slow) but I

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

Brian Nelson wrote: 6. It must have a decent expiry system. 7. It must not be dog slow. I have big folders and I don't want to wait 5 minutes to load them. Mutt suffers from 7, but it's not a big deal if you keep the number of messages in a folder under control. For this I use