Re: [comp.security] Secure computers

1998-11-06 Thread Kent West
On 5 Nov 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben Collins writes: Does this still protect against the popular nuclear bomb DoS attack? Yes. The level of service does not change at all when the site is nuked. -- Unless the lights were mercury vapor lights, in which case there might be some

[comp.security] Secure computers

1998-11-05 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Matt == Matthew Devney [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Matt Take it off the network, unplug it, lock the case, encase it in Matt 19 feet of concrete, and you can pretty much guarantee it'll be Matt safe. But the security consultant will still worry. Dennis == Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

Re: [comp.security] Secure computers

1998-11-05 Thread Ben Collins
Does this still protect against the popular nuclear bomb DoS attack? Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] UnixGroup Admin - NASA LaRC On 5 Nov 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Hi, Matt == Matthew Devney [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Matt Take it off

Re: [comp.security] Secure computers

1998-11-05 Thread john
Ben Collins writes: Does this still protect against the popular nuclear bomb DoS attack? Yes. The level of service does not change at all when the site is nuked. -- John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will.

Re: [comp.security] Secure computers

1998-11-05 Thread Neale Pickett
Manoj Srivastava writes: [ a pretty good, but still not quite up to snuff, procedure for securing a machine ] I have a better method, though. Gather all matter which has ever come into contact with the machine in question, either through network or disk activity, or which has been bombarded