On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:05:53 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
They can move on without hurting users :-(
Hmm... Is there something in particular that makes grub different from
any other random project?
Yes. There are not many bootloaders out there with the same capabilities
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:06:12 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Tom H wrote:
It is strange because it would have been easy and wold not have been
taxing to have a
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grublegacy.html page for those
people who need to consult or refer others to grub-legacy's manual
Camaleón wrote:
Bob proulx wrote:
Hmm... Is there something in particular that makes grub different from
any other random project?
Yes. There are not many bootloaders out there with the same capabilities
that show GRUB :-)
Besides, GRUB (legacy and 2) if the default bootloader in
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:05:30 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
Besides, GRUB (legacy and 2) if the default bootloader in many linux
distriburions, as well as BSD and OpenSolaris. It manages well with
many different environments, is very flexible and powefull so it tends
to be the
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:27:03 -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Camaleón wrote:
But it have been desiderable to name it GRUB2 or something like that
to prevent old GRUB users to be more confused than they are
On 20100710_103920, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Camale?n noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:27:03 -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Camale?n wrote:
But it have been desiderable to name it GRUB2 or something like that
to prevent old GRUB
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Paul E Condon
pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
On 20100710_103920, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Camale?n noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:27:03 -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Camale?n wrote:
But it
On 20100710_155720, Tom H wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Paul E Condon
pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
On 20100710_103920, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Camale?n noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:27:03 -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010
Paul E Condon wrote:
Tom H wrote:
Paul E Condon wrote:
Tom H wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
This is the same url as the previous (grub1) manual, so as far as gnu
is
concerned, there must only be one grub...
How bad! :-(
They have moved on. It doesn't benefit the upstream to
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:00:53 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Paul E Condon wrote:
Tom H wrote:
Paul E Condon wrote:
Tom H wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
This is the same url as the previous (grub1) manual, so as far
as gnu is concerned, there must only be one grub...
How bad! :-(
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Paul E Condon wrote:
Tom H wrote:
Paul E Condon wrote:
Tom H wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
This is the same url as the previous (grub1) manual, so as far as
gnu is
concerned, there must only be one grub...
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Paul E Condon
pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
I'm sorry for my misunderstanding of your relationship to this
wierdness.
No problem.
And thanks for your added information that access to the
old docs is decaying as we speak. Not good, IMHO.
You're welcome.
Camaleón wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
They have moved on.
They can move on without hurting users :-(
Hmm... Is there something in particular that makes grub different
from any other random project? Does every project need to keep every
version of their history available and online for all
Tom H wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Why is that strange? The official documentation for GNU projects is
texinfo documentation. It has been this way for a very long time.
It is strange because it would have been easy and wold not have been
taxing to have a
Bob Proulx wrote:
Well... If you (and Camaleón) feel that strongly about it then
discussing it here should just be a launching point to taking the
discussion to upstream. Don't be shy about giving them feedback!
Otherwise how will they know? I am sure they will have considered
this already
There is now an official grub2 manual:
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
There is now an official grub2 manual:
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html
Great news!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:53:30 -0500, Arthur Machlas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Tom H wrote:
There is now an official grub2 manual:
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html
Great news!
Sure...
But it have been desiderable to name it GRUB2 or something like that to
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:53:30 -0500, Arthur Machlas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Tom H wrote:
There is now an official grub2 manual:
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html
Great news!
Sure...
But it
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:27:03 -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Camaleón wrote:
But it have been desiderable to name it GRUB2 or something like that
to prevent old GRUB users to be more confused than they are now with 2
GRUBs in play :-)
This is the same url as the
20 matches
Mail list logo
