On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 07:44:55PM -0500, dircha wrote:
Pigeon wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 10:51:16PM -0500, dircha wrote:
The case for (b) is inaccurate... the filesystem *will* be readable
under Windoze, but will contain a whole bunch of files and directories
as opposed to a single file
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 10:51:16PM -0500, dircha wrote:
Howard Levine wrote:
I have learned that the CD that I had burnt at the public library is
an .iso image and is unusable, whereas I could have programmed NERO
to reinterpret the image when it was created. Is the ISObuster
utility proper
Pigeon wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 10:51:16PM -0500, dircha wrote:
The case for (b) is inaccurate... the filesystem *will* be readable
under Windoze, but will contain a whole bunch of files and directories
as opposed to a single file called something.iso.
I'm betting it's (a), and all you need
I'm pleased that my confirmation was successful. I feel too inundated with seventy-something e-mails, but it gives me every apprehension that I shall find all that I seek.
I'm a novice, hobbyist, and beginner to LINUXandthe internet. The open license project struck a pleasing chord. It is the way
Howard Levine wrote:
I have learned that the CD that I had burnt at the public library is
an .iso image and is unusable, whereas I could have programmed NERO
to reinterpret the image when it was created. Is the ISObuster
utility proper to make this usable or must I download again?
Welcome.
First, thanks to all who offered me the solution to make Linux recognize my
80MB ram. This user list is the best thing I've seen on the net.
Second, my xserver-svga is now working with my Matrox Mystique 220 card. I
was still running the version from Bo. I upgraded to the hamm version, and
all
Russ Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have numerous packages installed on my system. In the case of the
xserver-svga package, the version number of the Bo package was higher than
that of the Hamm package, and it was not apparent to me that I needed to
reinstall it. Is there a script similar
If you have successfully run autoup.sh then you need to run dselect
(though do read the upgrade howto's, etc.).
Autoup.sh is designed to get you to the point where deselect CAN do the
upgrade. One of the problems is that with the libc5 -- libc6 upgrade
many of the things that dselect/dpkg rely
From: Howard S. Ostrowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It turns out that my problem was due to the fact that I had
LD_PRELOAD set to libgnumalloc.so.5, which is apparently no
longer needed with libc6. But my question is this: I had
added this environment variable long ago because it was needed
by
Recently I did the libc5-to-libc6 install, and wound up with a
broken system. *One day* after I had posted a question, Carey
Evans had responded with some suggestions that solved my problem.
For this quick service I thank him and this group.
It turns out that my problem was due to the fact that
10 matches
Mail list logo
