Uhm, isn't smail finicky about the permissions on a .forward file? If it
does not trust the file, it will not obey it.
I am giving .sigs a break this month
George Bonser
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm using sendmail *duck*. And it seems to work sorta I think
my problem is one with procmail and slocal. Although I havent played much
with getting it to forward to another address, that was a problem from
a user that I couldn't figure out.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>Jason Kill
> > Does anyone have any idea why .forward would not forward or pipe
> > to a program (ie procmail). It seems like it is not even being
> > looked at.
>
> I came across the same problem.
>
> .forward is working fine as long as there are only some email
> addresses inside. It seems that Smail ca
Jason Killen writes:
>
> Does anyone have any idea why .forward would not forward or pipe to a program
> (ie procmail). It seems like it is not even being looked at.
Ouh, I thougt it was a misconfiguration by me on my machine in the
offices. Reading this it doesn't seem to be. :-(
I came acros
I think it needs to be world-readable. I was playing with it last week and
found that the smail log will show when a program is invoked. That helped
me get from step n to n+1.
On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Jason Killen wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any idea why .forward would not forward or pipe to a progra
Does anyone have any idea why .forward would not forward or pipe to a program
(ie procmail). It seems like it is not even being looked at.
Thanks
--
Jason Killen Question Stupidity
Ma ma's don't let your babies grow up to be Linux hackers
Monolith : the new A
6 matches
Mail list logo
