On 18 Oct 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> >>"Nikolai" == Nikolai Andreyevich Luzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Nikolai> This means that you will need to use the ipchains package
> Nikolai> (not yet debianisedq) to do firewalling/masq'ing.
>
> What do you mean, not yet Debianiz
Hi,
>>"Nikolai" == Nikolai Andreyevich Luzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nikolai> This means that you will need to use the ipchains package
Nikolai> (not yet debianisedq) to do firewalling/masq'ing.
What do you mean, not yet Debianized? It's in netbase.
manoj
__> type -a ipch
On Sat, 17 Oct 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Just a warning to anyone who is considering using the 2.1.x series since
> 2.2 is rumoured (I stress that word highly) to be out soon. If you use
> IP-Masqing it appears that the 2.1.x kernels break ipfwadm. With a broken
> ipfwadm it isn't possible t
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Just a warning to anyone who is considering using the 2.1.x series since
> 2.2 is rumoured (I stress that word highly) to be out soon. If you use
> IP-Masqing it appears that the 2.1.x kernels break ipfwadm. With a broken
> ipfwadm it isn't possible to add/remove IP-Masqing
> Just a warning to anyone who is considering using the 2.1.x series since
> 2.2 is rumoured (I stress that word highly) to be out soon. If you use
> IP-Masqing it appears that the 2.1.x kernels break ipfwadm. With a broken
I've never used ipchains, but according to xos.nl, kernels 2.1.102
Just a warning to anyone who is considering using the 2.1.x series since
2.2 is rumoured (I stress that word highly) to be out soon. If you use
IP-Masqing it appears that the 2.1.x kernels break ipfwadm. With a broken
ipfwadm it isn't possible to add/remove IP-Masqing rules like "normal."
Th
6 matches
Mail list logo
