On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 06:59 +0200, John Que wrote:
Hello,
I am a newbie to Debian.
I had downloaded the dvd iso for debian:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-dvd
This site is condisered the primary CD image server
according to http://www.debian.org.
(I downloaded
Hello,
I am a newbie to Debian.
I had downloaded the dvd iso for debian:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-dvd
This site is condisered the primary CD image server
according to http://www.debian.org.
(I downloaded it through http because there was some problem with my bittorent
HI, a simple question here, when I wanted to download the netinst ISO
image for Sarge at this address:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r0a-i386-netinst.iso
I found that the release was named 3.1_r0a. Just for curiosity, what
does that a mean?
Thanks.
Hello *,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:11:44PM +0800, hell0 un1verse wrote:
HI, a simple question here, when I wanted to download the netinst ISO
image for Sarge at this address:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r0a-i386-netinst.iso
I found that the release
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:11:44PM +0800, hell0 un1verse wrote:
I found that the release was named 3.1_r0a. Just for curiosity, what
does that a mean?
It simply means it is the first update to the 3.1_r0 release. It was
released just a day after the original release. There was a mistake
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
HI, a simple question here, when I wanted to download the netinst ISO
image for Sarge at this address:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r0a-i386-netinst.iso
I found that the release was named 3.1_r0a. Just for curiosity, what
I see. Thanks.
On 6/10/05, Maurits van Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:11:44PM +0800, hell0 un1verse wrote:
I found that the release was named 3.1_r0a. Just for curiosity, what
does that a mean?
It simply means it is the first update to the 3.1_r0 release
On 6/8/05, Hans du Plooy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
What's the difference between 3.1_r0 and 3.1_r0a?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg3.html
Best regards,
Hannes.
Hi guys,
What's the difference between 3.1_r0 and 3.1_r0a?
Thanks
--
Kind Regards
Hans du Plooy
SagacIT (Pty) Ltd
hansdp at sagacit dot com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 03:26:07PM +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
Hi guys,
What's the difference between 3.1_r0 and 3.1_r0a?
3.1r0a fixes a minor bug in the originally mastered CD/DVD images that
caused the installer to insert `testing' instead of sarge into the
sources.list of a newly
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 09:31 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
3.1r0a fixes a minor bug in the originally mastered CD/DVD images that
caused the installer to insert `testing' instead of sarge into the
sources.list of a newly installed system. You really only need it if
you are going to install
Hello *,
[ partially following your Reply-To ]
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:13:48PM +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 09:31 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
3.1r0a fixes a minor bug in the originally mastered CD/DVD images that
caused the installer to insert `testing' instead
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:13:48 +0200
Hans du Plooy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 09:31 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
3.1r0a fixes a minor bug in the originally mastered CD/DVD images
that caused the installer to insert `testing' instead of sarge into
the sources.list of a
I've been trying with torrent, but can't get it to work, so I've been
downloading cd images (several local friends need CDs since they have bad
connections). Is it just me, or is there a problem with finding images for
CDs 7 8 for 3.1r0a anywhere? The links are there, at least at the main
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 01:14 pm, Hal Vaughan wrote:
I've been trying with torrent, but can't get it to work, so I've been
downloading cd images (several local friends need CDs since they have bad
connections). Is it just me, or is there a problem with finding images for
CDs 7 8 for 3.1r0a
Why you dont try the DVD images over Bittorrent? That would be much
better that download 14 CD images or not?
greetz
Dominik
On 6/8/05, Hal Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 01:14 pm, Hal Vaughan wrote:
I've been trying with torrent, but can't get it to work, so
16 matches
Mail list logo
