On Sep 11, 2018, at 12:28 PM, Martin McCormick wrote:
> /bin/rm: cannot remove
> '/var/cache/rsnapshot/halfday.1/wb5agz/home/usr/lib/i386
> -linux-gnu': Transport endpoint is not connected
In your rsnapshot.conf file, is “use_lazy_deletes” set to 1? If so, the final
delete part of “rsnapsho
=?UTF-8?Q?=c3=89tienne_Mollier?= writes:
>
> Good Day,
>
> Not sure if that is the kind of answer you would wish to
> expect, but have you considered doing umounts sequentially?
> (optionally after synchronizing file systems)
>
> sync
> umount /var/cache/rsnapshot
> umou
=?UTF-8?Q?=c3=89tienne_Mollier?= writes:
> Good Day Gene,
>
> Gene Heskett 2018-09-12T03:14 +0200 :
>
> Should a badly placed “rm” command occur on the system, the
> system and both of its backup disks would be wiped clean. I
> don't believe the risk mentioned here over was related to disk
>
On Wednesday 12 September 2018 13:12:43 Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Good Day Gene,
>
> Gene Heskett 2018-09-12T03:14 +0200 :
> > On Tuesday 11 September 2018 15:28:30 Martin McCormick wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >Any constructive ideas are appreciated. If I left
> > > the drives mounted al
Good Day Gene,
Gene Heskett 2018-09-12T03:14 +0200 :
> On Tuesday 11 September 2018 15:28:30 Martin McCormick wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >Any constructive ideas are appreciated. If I left
> > the drives mounted all the time, there would be no spew but
> > since these are backup drives, having
On Tuesday 11 September 2018 15:28:30 Martin McCormick wrote:
[...]
> Any constructive ideas are appreciated. If I left the
> drives mounted all the time, there would be no spew but since
> these are backup drives, having them mounted all the time is
> quite risky.
>
> Martin McCormick WB
=?UTF-8?Q?=c3=89tienne_Mollier?= writes:
>
> Good Day,
>
> Not sure if that is the kind of answer you would wish to
> expect, but have you considered doing umounts sequentially?
> (optionally after synchronizing file systems)
>
> sync
> umount /var/cache/rsnapshot
> umou
On 9/11/18 9:28 PM, Martin McCormick wrote:
> #Combine 2 256-GB drives in to 1 512 GB drive.
>
> mount /rsnapshot1
> mount /rsnapshot2
> mhddfs /rsnapshot1,/rsnapshot2 /var/cache/rsnapshot -o mlimit=100M
>
-8<8<
> I have actually tried
>
> umount /rsnaps
This has all the earmarks of a race condition because it is
totally intermittent. It succeeds maybe 80% of the time.
I am using rsync to backup a Linux system to a pair of
thumb drives which both appear to be healthy. The mounting
process goes as follows:
#Combine 2 256-GB drives in to
9 matches
Mail list logo