Am 16.10.2012 um 15:48 schrieb Paul E Condon:
I think you are mistaken about the sync only once a day. The signals
giving the year month and day are given once a day, but the precise
time-tics are given throughout the day. My clock has an indication
when it is receiving the radio signal which
Am 16.10.2012 um 18:54 schrieb Doug:
If you live within the coverage area and
your WWVB clock is unable to synchronize, it usually means a source
of radio interference
is near the receiver. Some common culprits are computer monitors
(some have a
scan rate at or very close to 60 kHz), noisy
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 09:49 +0200, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote:
cheap ones (20 - 40 EUR/USD)
Radio-controlled table clocks cost less than 9,- EUR some time ago, at a
German discounter.
End of 2009 I bought a power meter for 9.99 EUR from a German
discounter. I've got reasonable doubt that the
/snip/
If and since when the US take part of this coordination--I don't know.
The US do not like international agreements. Have the US signed the
Human Rights, or the international Woman Rights?
Helmut Wollmersdorfer
The NIST site I mentioned before details the US participation in
On 20121016_120614, John Hasler wrote:
I just tried name1.glorb.com. It is distributing correct time and your
machine is synchronizing properly to it. Your wall clock is broken.
--
John Hasler
I've placed an order for a replacement 'atomic' clock. Thanks to everyone
for the interesting
On 20121015_214840, John Hasler wrote:
Paul E Condon writes:
Ideas?
Run cronyc and post the results of the tracking and sources
commands.
--
John Hasler
I've now switched to chrony. The offset between 'atomic clock' and
Gnome clock display remains greater than 15sec. Its hard to be more
On 10/16/2012 02:07 AM, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20121015_214840, John Hasler wrote:
Paul E Condon writes:
Ideas?
Run cronyc and post the results of the tracking and sources
commands.
--
John Hasler
I've now switched to chrony. The offset between 'atomic clock' and
Gnome clock display remains
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 02:59:37AM -0400, Doug wrote:
On 10/16/2012 02:07 AM, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20121015_214840, John Hasler wrote:
Paul E Condon writes:
Ideas?
Run cronyc and post the results of the tracking and sources
commands.
--
John Hasler
I've now switched to chrony. The
Paul E Condon writes:
Now I am running NTP.
Does Ntp agree with your wall clock?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
* Helmut Wollmersdorfer helmut.wollmersdor...@fixpunkt.de [121016 12:12]:
My experience with radio clocks is that they have cheap electronic
components failing to work after some time.
Unless you have more than one atomic clock and both agree,
the first thing to do is remove the battery from
On 20121016_062545, John Hasler wrote:
Paul E Condon writes:
Now I am running NTP.
Does Ntp agree with your wall clock?
--
John Hasler
No. It displays the same offset into the future in reference to the
SkyScan clock.
Also, I have escalated my effort on this. I actually have three(3)
On 20121016_102703, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote:
Am 16.10.2012 um 04:35 schrieb Paul E Condon:
I've been running Debian for many years. During most of those years I
have had a SkyScan(tm) 'Atomic Clock' on the wall near my Debian
desktop computer. The physical computer has changed over the
On Ma, 16 oct 12, 07:48:17, Paul E Condon wrote:
I think you are mistaken about the sync only once a day. The signals
giving the year month and day are given once a day, but the precise
time-tics are given throughout the day.
Well, in Europe the signal is indeed sent every second, but this
A receiver for WWVB at 60KHz that would decode the signals would be
as accurate as anyone could want. That's the signal that your atomic
clock receives, so the clock *should* be accurate. You might only be
able to receive the signal in the nighttime hours, like the clock.
Typically, the clock
Darac Marjal wrote at 2012-10-16 04:00 -0500:
Instead, I would suggest that it is your wall clock that is running
slow.
Perhaps the second hand moved relative to the shaft at some point.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 20121016_123854, Russell L. Harris wrote:
* Helmut Wollmersdorfer helmut.wollmersdor...@fixpunkt.de [121016 12:12]:
My experience with radio clocks is that they have cheap electronic
components failing to work after some time.
Unless you have more than one atomic clock and both
It is instructive to look at the NIST website that discusses the time
standards and the broadcasting of the time.
http://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/1383.pdf
There is a useful chart of available sources of time and the accuracy
available
on page 11, table 1.1.
Problems in reception are
I just tried name1.glorb.com. It is distributing correct time and your
machine is synchronizing properly to it. Your wall clock is broken.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
To add to my previous post, re WWV: you can still hear the
radio station by telephone. the website I cited before can
be reached, as reported:
To hear these broadcasts, dial (303) 499-7111 for WWV and (808) 335-4363
for WWVH.
You can listen for about two minutes before your call is
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:49:19AM -0400, Doug wrote:
A receiver for WWVB at 60KHz that would decode the signals would be
as accurate as anyone could want. That's the signal that your atomic
clock receives, so the clock *should* be accurate. You might only be
able to receive the signal in
I've been running Debian for many years. During most of those years I
have had a SkyScan(tm) 'Atomic Clock' on the wall near my Debian
desktop computer. The physical computer has changed over the years,
but not my using Debian, or my Atomic Clock. Until a few weeks ago,
they always displayed the
Paul E Condon writes:
Ideas?
Run cronyc and post the results of the tracking and sources
commands.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 20121015_214840, John Hasler wrote:
Paul E Condon writes:
Ideas?
Run cronyc and post the results of the tracking and sources
commands.
--
John Hasler
Now I am running NTP. Is there something I could post from NTP
that would be useful? The switch will take some time, and I'd
rather
On 10/15/2012 10:35 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
I've been running Debian for many years. During most of those years I
have had a SkyScan(tm) 'Atomic Clock' on the wall near my Debian
desktop computer. The physical computer has changed over the years,
but not my using Debian, or my Atomic Clock.
Paul E Condon pecon...@mesanetworks.net writes:
On 20121015_214840, John Hasler wrote:
Paul E Condon writes:
Ideas?
Run cronyc and post the results of the tracking and sources
commands.
Now I am running NTP. Is there something I could post from NTP that
would be useful?
$ ntpq
25 matches
Mail list logo
