Re: Apology about my rant

2001-09-24 Thread Mike Pfleger
* Mike Pfleger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I don't know about anyone else, but after the second innappropriate > posting by this individual, Errr... just to clarify, by "individual" I meant the originator of this thread, not Craig. I thought this was clear; but on re-reading, it seemed like it

Re: Apology about my rant

2001-09-24 Thread Mike Pfleger
* Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > No hard feelings. One thing, though, is that I've seen you write > intemperate messages on other occasions, too, most recently on the ext3 > mailing list. I don't know about anyone else, but after the second innappropriate posting by this individual,

Re: Apology about my rant

2001-09-24 Thread Craig Dickson
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > I'm sorry to have sent my rant about /tmp on Saturday. It wasn't > appropriate for the list and it also wasn't any fault except my own that I > didn't understand the differences between Debian and my usual system. I > was very upset to have had my machine crash, then de

Re: Apology about my rant

2001-09-24 Thread Martin F Krafft
also sprach Jeffrey W. Baker (on Mon, 24 Sep 2001 08:24:25AM -0700): > I'm sorry to have sent my rant about /tmp on Saturday. It wasn't > appropriate for the list and it also wasn't any fault except my own that I > didn't understand the differences between Debian and my usual system. I > was very

Apology about my rant

2001-09-24 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
I'm sorry to have sent my rant about /tmp on Saturday. It wasn't appropriate for the list and it also wasn't any fault except my own that I didn't understand the differences between Debian and my usual system. I was very upset to have had my machine crash, then delete my work, but I needn't have