On Thu 29 Jun 2017 at 07:31:35 (+), Curt wrote:
> On 2017-06-28, David Wright wrote:
> >
> >> 'apt-get install ' will tell you why a package is being held
> >> back (or, as discussed in another thread, will ask your permission to
> >> install an extra package--or
On 2017-06-28, David Wright wrote:
>
>> 'apt-get install ' will tell you why a package is being held
>> back (or, as discussed in another thread, will ask your permission to
>> install an extra package--or packages--in order to meet its dependencies).
>
> It's less risky
On Sun 25 Jun 2017 at 11:36:37 (+), Curt wrote:
> On 2017-06-25, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> >
> > My question is that since the upgrade chromium is held back from
> > upgrading, and in this new world I don't know how to find out why. In
> > aptitude I would have done
On Wed 28 Jun 2017 at 22:19:18 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> >
> > In short, use aptitude for why and why-not. Closest thing apt-get and
> > friends have would be apt-cache --important depends/rdepends. But,
> > aptitude is much
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:36:37AM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2017-06-25, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> >
> > My question is that since the upgrade chromium is held back from
> > upgrading, and in this new world I don't know how to find out why. In
> > aptitude I would have done
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> On 25-06-17, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > Hello the list!
> >
> > I have upgraded this weekend from Jessie to Stretch. All went, overall,
> > reasonably smoothly -- the documentation around releases is getting
> > better and better. I
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:29:27PM -0700, Cousin Stanley wrote:
> Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> >
> > I do wish apt show made it easier to tell
> > if a package is installed
> >
>
> $ apt policy some-pkg-name
>
> which evolved from
>
> $ apt-cache policy pkg-name
>
>
> will
Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> I do wish apt show made it easier to tell
> if a package is installed
>
$ apt policy some-pkg-name
which evolved from
$ apt-cache policy pkg-name
will display installation status
of some-pkg-name
--
Stanley C. Kitching
Human Being
Phoenix,
On 2017-06-25, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> My question is that since the upgrade chromium is held back from
> upgrading, and in this new world I don't know how to find out why. In
> aptitude I would have done aptitude why-not chromium and it would most
> likely have told me
On 25-06-17, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Hello the list!
>
> I have upgraded this weekend from Jessie to Stretch. All went, overall,
> reasonably smoothly -- the documentation around releases is getting
> better and better. I plan to write a full report of the upgrade and
> share it here shortly.
Hello the list!
I have upgraded this weekend from Jessie to Stretch. All went, overall,
reasonably smoothly -- the documentation around releases is getting
better and better. I plan to write a full report of the upgrade and
share it here shortly. In the meantime I have one question.
It seems
On 05/23/2017 08:47 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:23:46AM -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
>> Original Message
>> Subject: Re: Apt Question
>> UTC Time: May 23, 2017 11:54 AM
>> From: wool...@eeg.ccf.org
>
>>> If he
&g
On 05/23/2017 03:57 AM, Fungi4All wrote:
>
>> Original Message
>> Subject: Re: Apt Question
>> UTC Time: May 22, 2017 11:02 PM
>> From: songb...@anthive.com
>>
>> Michael Milliman wrote:
>> > I have, for various reasons, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:23:46AM -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Apt Question
> UTC Time: May 23, 2017 11:54 AM
> From: wool...@eeg.ccf.org
>
> > If he
> > is already running
Original Message
Subject: Re: Apt Question
UTC Time: May 23, 2017 11:54 AM
From: wool...@eeg.ccf.org
> If he
> is already running a sid linux kernel and some other core packages by
> switching to jessie he will be stuck with those packages almost indefinitely,
He's no
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 04:57:03AM -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
> Michael Milliman wrote:
> > I have, for various reasons, the repositories from stable (Jessie),
> > stretch, and sid in my sources.list file. I have Stretch installed and
> > have it running for some time.
> I don't know, I am not being
Original Message
Subject: Re: Apt Question
UTC Time: May 22, 2017 11:02 PM
From: songb...@anthive.com
Michael Milliman wrote:
> I have, for various reasons, the repositories from stable (Jessie),
> stretch, and sid in my sources.list file. I have Stretch installed and
Michael Milliman wrote:
> I have, for various reasons, the repositories from stable (Jessie),
> stretch, and sid in my sources.list file. I have Stretch installed and
> have it running for some time. On occasion, there is a bug in Stretch
> and I revert to the stable version of the package until
I have, for various reasons, the repositories from stable (Jessie),
stretch, and sid in my sources.list file. I have Stretch installed and
have it running for some time. On occasion, there is a bug in Stretch
and I revert to the stable version of the package until the bug gets
worked out. I
Hi all...
I couldn't think of an appropriate subject, so that will have to do... :)
I have a couple of servers each with a bunch of packages installed,
and I would like some way of getting that exact bunch of packages
installed on a fresh Debian install. Is there any way to get some
list of
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:11:29AM +1300, Matt Parlane wrote:
I couldn't think of an appropriate subject, so that will have to do... :)
duplication package setup across machines ?
I have a couple of servers each with a bunch of packages installed,
and I would like some way of getting that
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:11:29AM +1300, Matt Parlane wrote:
Hi all...
I couldn't think of an appropriate subject, so that will have to do... :)
I have a couple of servers each with a bunch of packages installed,
and I would like some way of getting that exact bunch of packages
Hi All...
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 05:17:14PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:11:29AM +1300, Matt Parlane wrote:
Hi all...
I couldn't think of an appropriate subject, so that will have to do... :)
I have a couple of servers each with a bunch of packages
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:11:29AM +1300, Matt Parlane wrote:
Hi all...
I couldn't think of an appropriate subject, so that will have to do... :)
I have a couple of servers each with a bunch of packages installed,
and I would like some
Hello
Hugh Crissman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
How do I exclude a package when doing a upgrade. Say Postfix for
example. I want to update all the packages on my system but I don't
want to update Postfix. How would I do that?
You can set the package to hold usind aptitude or dselect or
dpkg
Hugh Crissman a écrit :
How do I exclude a package when doing a upgrade. Say Postfix for
example. I want to update all the packages on my system but I don't
want to update Postfix. How would I do that?
With aptitude, you select the package you don't want to upgrade and then
press the '=' key.
How do I exclude a package when doing a upgrade. Say Postfix for
example. I want to update all the packages on my system but I don't want
to update Postfix. How would I do that?
HCrissman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi All,
like a lot of people I run a local apt repository combined with an
apt-proxy that caches a close official debian distribution server. My local
installation web server looks like:
/var/debian/
total 36
drwxr-xr-x 8 www-data www-data 4096 2005-11-11 19:41 .
drwxr-xr-x 16 root
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 20:29, Bradley Alexander wrote:
Got a quick apt question. I had a DIMM go bad in my sid system, and
thanks to having to hard reset it during troubleshooting, a couple of
filesystems got trashed.
I removed the bad DIMM, and was able to rebuild the filesystems
Got a quick apt question. I had a DIMM go bad in my sid system, and thanks to
having to hard reset it during troubleshooting, a couple of filesystems got
trashed.
I removed the bad DIMM, and was able to rebuild the filesystems (reiserfs).
However, a slew of files (700+) got put in lost+found
Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
Is there any particular reason that you don't want to use aptitude or
dselect to interactively change the installed packages?
--
monique
sorry, there was more to the story than i guess i led you to believe. here's a bit
more information.
the existing debian box
we are now going to roll out these changes to all our machines in this complex (30+)
and another 15-20 machines in two satellite offices.
thanks all,
Preston
There are a large number of utility programs just in case you're unaware of them.
Stuff to let you do ongoing package management,
i have inherited an existing debian box and want to change the packages to suit me
and the office that it will now be used.
i would like to take the installed packages listed from:
dpkg --get-selections packages.txt
and edit the file to reflect what i actually want/need on the box.
after i
--- Preston Boyington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dpkg --set-selections packages.txt
then:
apt-get install
^^^
Wrong. You want to do:
apt-get dselect-upgrade
-- Thomas Adam
=
The Linux Weekend Mechanic -- http://linuxgazette.net
TAG Editor --
On 2004-07-22, Preston Boyington penned:
i have inherited an existing debian box and want to change the
packages to suit me and the office that it will now be used.
i would like to take the installed packages listed from:
dpkg --get-selections packages.txt
and edit the file to reflect
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:26:03 -0600, Kent West wrote:
Mark Healey wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:10:26 -0600, Kent West wrote:
Did you apt-get update first? If not, you need to.
Thanks. I could swear that wasn't in the man page.
enjae[westk]:/home/westk man apt-get
. . .
DESCRIPTION
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:53:35 -0600, Kent West wrote:
As you recommended I added these lines to my /etc/apt/sources.list:
# Uncomment if you want the apt-get source function to work
which I did
#deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
#deb-src
Mark Healey wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:53:35 -0600, Kent West wrote:
As you recommended I added these lines to my /etc/apt/sources.list:
# Uncomment if you want the apt-get source function to work
which I did
#deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:10:26 -0600, Kent West wrote:
Mark Healey wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:53:35 -0600, Kent West wrote:
As you recommended I added these lines to my /etc/apt/sources.list:
# Uncomment if you want the apt-get source function to work
which I did
#deb-src
Mark Healey wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:10:26 -0600, Kent West wrote:
Did you apt-get update first? If not, you need to.
Thanks. I could swear that wasn't in the man page.
enjae[westk]:/home/westk man apt-get
. . .
DESCRIPTION
apt-get is the command-line tool for handling
on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:36:26PM +, Ken Gilmour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Replying to the message sent by Karsten M. Self ?on Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:51:35 -0800,
received at 15:32:59 on 21/11/2003. Karsten M. Self wrote:
snip
Much of your objective could be attained via a reasonable
Replying to the message sent by Karsten M. Self on Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:51:35 -0800,
received at 15:32:59 on 21/11/2003. Karsten M. Self wrote:
snip
Much of your objective could be attained via a reasonable partitioning
scheme. The existing Debian Policy specification of what files go where
on Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:01:42PM -0800, Wm.G.McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way I can reset the directory/partition that apt uses
to install software? I believe it currently install packages under
/usr... and /var
The history of *nix is very diverse and
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:49:22AM -0800, Wm.G.McGrath wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:58:47 -0700
Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: I don't know the answer to your question, but:
:
: The thing that really sold me on switching from RH to Debian was a
: document called File
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 01:04:42 +
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Debian packages aren't relocatable, I'm afraid. Their maintainer
: scripts frequently contain absolute paths or call other utilities
: that expect certain absolute paths, and changing this would be a
: ginormous amount of
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:58:47 -0700
Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: I don't know the answer to your question, but:
:
: The thing that really sold me on switching from RH to Debian was a
: document called File Heirarchy Standard. FHS sets out in great
: detail exactly where every type
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:49:22AM -0800, Wm. G. McGrath wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:58:47 -0700
Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: The thing that really sold me on switching from RH to Debian was a
: document called File Heirarchy Standard. FHS sets out in great
: detail exactly
Hi,
Is there any way I can reset the directory/partition that apt uses
to install software? I believe it currently install packages under
/usr... and /var
The history of *nix is very diverse and reflected in the (needless?)
complexity of its directory structure. /usr is very large and used
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:01:42PM -0800, Wm.G.McGrath wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way I can reset the directory/partition that apt uses
to install software? I believe it currently install packages under
/usr... and /var
The history of *nix is very diverse and reflected in the
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:01:42PM -0800, Wm. G. McGrath wrote:
Is there any way I can reset the directory/partition that apt uses
to install software? I believe it currently install packages under
/usr... and /var
Debian packages aren't relocatable, I'm afraid. Their maintainer scripts
At 01 Oct 2003 14:47:58 +0200,
JG wrote:
Hi,
Put the package on hold. Select your package on dselect or aptitude
and press = to put it on hold. Or
$ echo pptp-client hold | dpkg --set-selections
This will keep the package at the current version (unless you
intentionally install a new
Hi all,
Happily back on debian again and with it more questions...:)
Question: Is there a way to tell apt to never upgrade a certain package?
while upgrading everything
else?
Details:
I have to use pptp-client to connect to my adsl provider. This in itself is
not a problem,
but the only
In order to get a few packages to the versions I wanted them at, I ended
up using packages from unstable. Unfortunately, I ended up getting
libc6 and a few other important ones. Now I'm seeing various errors
sporadically that I suspect are related to this upgrade.
First question, what's the
Chris Kenrick wrote:
In order to get a few packages to the versions I wanted them at, I ended
up using packages from unstable. Unfortunately, I ended up getting
libc6 and a few other important ones. Now I'm seeing various errors
sporadically that I suspect are related to this upgrade.
First
It's easy, and helpful. :)
Create/Add...
Package: *
Pin: release a=testing
Pin-priority: 900
Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-priority: 50
...To your /etc/apt/preferences, and add a sid source at the end of your
/etc/apt/sources.list. If you're using potato, you'd change the 'Pin:
A few weeks ago I heard something about pinning in apt. If I remember
correctly you can put sid in your sources.list and pin its urgency down
to 50 and there for you could install stuff in sid with out upgradeing
to sid. Or something to that effect. Ive looked through the archives,
but I cant
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:23:51PM -0500, Scott Henson wrote:
| A few weeks ago I heard something about pinning in apt. If I remember
| correctly you can put sid in your sources.list and pin its urgency down
| to 50 and there for you could install stuff in sid with out upgradeing
| to sid. Or
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 20:23, Scott Henson wrote:
A few weeks ago I heard something about pinning in apt. If I remember
correctly you can put sid in your sources.list and pin its urgency down
to 50 and there for you could install stuff in sid with out upgradeing
to sid. Or something to
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also apt-get install apt-howto/unstable
Sweet! Thanks.
Armed with new information, I would interpret the following stanza
as Don't install *anything* that the Debian folks created.
Correct?
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian
Pin-Priority: -10
--
I asked myself the questions: How do I add the occasional unstable
package to my testing system in a better way than downloading debs
and using dpkg to install them? How do I track packages in testing
that I originally got out of unstable? Finally, and less often, how
do I track a
Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even after pouring over the apt-preferences man page a few times, I
have no idea what is meant by the second stanza.
Examples should be added to /usr/share/doc/apt as well.
http://bugs.debian.org/114417
--
Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 06:10:10PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even after pouring over the apt-preferences man page a few times, I
have no idea what is meant by the second stanza.
Examples should be added to /usr/share/doc/apt as well.
Joerg == Joerg Johannes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joerg Hi List Where does apt store the packages.gz files it
Joerg downloaded when doing apt-get update? My idea is to copy them
Joerg to another computer (which has no internet access) for doing a
Joerg dist-upgrade.
Take a look at apt-move. I
Hi List
Where does apt store the packages.gz files it downloaded when doing
apt-get update?
My idea is to copy them to another computer (which has no internet
access) for doing a dist-upgrade. I think all I need is an up-to-date
list of available packages including their dependencies, and the new
use download only option for apt-get , debs are already compressed, then
transfer
- Original Message -
From: Joerg Johannes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 7:32 AM
Subject: yet another apt question
Hi List
Where does apt
Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
use download only option for apt-get , debs are already compressed, then
transfer
NO, you misunderstood my question. I know what to do with the debs, once
I have them downloaded. I want to know how to tell the offline-box which
debs to use without doing apt-get update
On 13 Aug 2001 13:32:48 +0200, Joerg Johannes wrote:
Hi List
Where does apt store the packages.gz files it downloaded when doing
apt-get update?
My idea is to copy them to another computer (which has no internet
access) for doing a dist-upgrade. I think all I need is an up-to-date
list of
Joerg Johannes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JJ NO, you misunderstood my question. I know what to do with the debs, once
JJ I have them downloaded. I want to know how to tell the offline-box which
JJ debs to use without doing apt-get update (because it's
JJ impossible).
You can just copy the package
David Z. Maze wrote:
Joerg Johannes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JJ NO, you misunderstood my question. I know what to do with the debs, once
JJ I have them downloaded. I want to know how to tell the offline-box which
JJ debs to use without doing apt-get update (because it's
JJ impossible).
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 03:40:11PM +0200, Andrea Vettorello wrote:
In sid, apt store the info in /var/lib/apt/lists, don't remember for
potato... (something like /var/state/apt/lists, but i could be wrong)
Actually for potato they are in /var/state/apt/lists.
In woody and sid they are in
Am 03. Jul, 2001 schwäzte Paul Mackinney so:
Disclaimer: Post from blatant newbie.
I tried der.hans' advice to add the two lines to /etc/apt/sources.list for
woody (these exactly match the woody page on www.debian.org, BTW)
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
Am 03. Jul, 2001 schwäzte D-Man so:
I used 'dist-upgrade', not 'install apt', a couple weeks ago. I got
the same sort of errors. I tried the '-f' (force) option (as suggested
Actually, -f is --fix-broken.
by some program) and it worked. I then killed it so I could go back to
regular
Hi!
I think I have read about some ssh enabled apt some time ago on this list. I
have searched the mailing lsit archives, but could not find anything. If
someone knows of a way how to use apt with ssh I'd really be gratefull for the
information.
THX in advance!
Bostjan
--
Boštjan Müller
Disclaimer: Post from blatant newbie.
I tried der.hans' advice to add the two lines to /etc/apt/sources.list
for woody (these exactly match the woody page on www.debian.org, BTW)
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:54:02PM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
| Disclaimer: Post from blatant newbie.
|
| I tried der.hans' advice to add the two lines to /etc/apt/sources.list
| for woody (these exactly match the woody page on www.debian.org, BTW)
| Unpacking g++-2.95 (from
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:37:11PM -0500, will trillich wrote:
i stick with potato. it worked yesterday, it'll still work
tomorrow. i may WANT something fancy that's only in woody, but i
can make do with potato just fine. and intelligent contributors
keep backporting other gizmos to potato
Am 15. Jun, 2001 schwäzte Ben Harvey so:
I remember hearing something about mixing potato woody in sources.list so
that apt wont use the unstable version unless you explicitly tell it to.
now that I want to do just that I can't find the relevant docs/archived mail
It might have had
Ello
i've installed debian on my comp for the first time
and when i was installing it (base-config) from an ftp site
(ftp.pl.debian.org) apt downloads very old packages ie. xfree-3.3.6
gnome-1.0 and so on can someone tell me what i have to write to
sources.list to make apt to
HI
pReJkEr wrote:
Ello
i've installed debian on my comp for the first time
and when i was installing it (base-config) from an ftp site
(ftp.pl.debian.org) apt downloads very old packages ie. xfree-3.3.6
gnome-1.0 and so on can someone tell me what i have to write
to
sources.list to make
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:15:14AM -0500, Andrew Dixon decreed:
i've installed debian on my comp for the first time
and when i was installing it (base-config) from an ftp site
(ftp.pl.debian.org) apt downloads very old packages ie. xfree-3.3.6
gnome-1.0 and so on can someone
Am 14. Jun, 2001 schwäzte pReJkEr so:
i've installed debian on my comp for the first time
and when i was installing it (base-config) from an ftp site
(ftp.pl.debian.org) apt downloads very old packages ie. xfree-3.3.6
gnome-1.0 and so on can someone tell me what i have to write to
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 08:51:47PM +0200, pReJkEr wrote:
Ello
i've installed debian on my comp for the first time
and when i was installing it (base-config) from an ftp site
(ftp.pl.debian.org) apt downloads very old packages ie. xfree-3.3.6
gnome-1.0 and so on can someone tell
Jitse Niesen wrote:
You can add the following line to /etc/apt/apt.conf:
APT::Default-Release testing;
Hm, I tried that with poor results, the following in
/etc/apt/preferences works much better for me:
Package: *
Pin: release a=testing
Pin-Priority: 900
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Radu Muschevici wrote:
is it posible to have two distro lines in /etc/apt/sources.list
like this:
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
and prevent apt from taking every
On Sun, 25 Mar, 2001 at 19:37:04 +0100, Jitse Niesen wrote:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Radu Muschevici wrote:
is it posible to have two distro lines in /etc/apt/sources.list
like this:
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
Entries like this are not wise, because you will get only the newest
packages in the list, using select funktion of dselect.
I want to run testing and only
On Sat, 24 Mar, 2001 at 09:58:28 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
Entries like this are not wise, because you will get only the newest
packages in the list,
on Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 03:47:47AM +0100, Radu Muschevici ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
is it posible to have two distro lines in /etc/apt/sources.list
like this:
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free
is it posible to have two distro lines in /etc/apt/sources.list
like this:
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
and prevent apt from taking every package from unstable since it
has the newer
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/05/01
at 12:52 PM, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Just package your private package with higher version number and install
over working Debian is safer. That is the right way.
Maybe I could make a simple deb package of my sources. How hard is it to
do that?
Read packaging-manual and debian-policy. I aint no expert.
Maybe I could make a simple deb package of my sources. How hard is it to
do that? Is there a link to some good docs?
--
+ Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED], GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D +
+ Fingerprint: 814E BD64 3288 40E7 E88E 3D92
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/05/01
at 12:52 PM, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Just package your private package with higher version number and install
over working Debian is safer. That is the right way.
Maybe I could make a simple deb package of my sources. How hard is it to
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/04/01
at 08:16 PM, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am sure you have enough space on HD (like swap).
Just do not overwrite current system. Even if you try to hold them with
dselect, you have broken dependency.
Yeah. Is there a way to get into the dependency
I have a mostly working Linux setup that I have
maintained and upgraded over the years using
sources I've compiled and installed.
I want to use apt so that I can test and checkout
various applications and can remove them easily
if I no longer need, or don't like them.
How can I tell apt/dselect
Hi,
Mixing packaging system is considered bad practice. I think it is best
not to do. Alternative is dual boot Linux if it is not dedicated
production server. (If serious server, just set up another backup
machine)
Install debian and transfer data (mount partition or NFS) to migrate.
Debian
I have a mostly working Linux setup that I have
maintained and upgraded over the years using
sources I've compiled and installed.
I want to use apt so that I can test and checkout
various applications and can remove them easily
if I no longer need, or don't like them.
How can I tell
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, F. Heitkamp wrote:
I have a mostly working Linux setup that I have
maintained and upgraded over the years using
sources I've compiled and installed.
I want to use apt so that I can test and checkout
various applications and can remove them easily
if I no longer need, or don't
I may have misunderstood original posting but...
Enen if original poster started with one of Debian, he seems have
installled binary programs without debian package. (If he started
with RH or Slack, things are worse.)
If these programs are needed and can not be replaced by Debian ones, my
best
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/04/01
at 07:14 PM, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I may have misunderstood original posting but...
Enen if original poster started with one of Debian, he seems have
installled binary programs without debian package. (If he started with RH
or Slack, things are
I am sure you have enough space on HD (like swap).
Just do not overwrite current system. Even if you try to hold them with
dselect, you have broken dependency.
You really need to install new base system. (anything less will get you
into trouble.)
1. Make space somewhere on HD. (move files
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo