On 04.02.2010 23:09, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd of=$(hostname)-$(date +%Y%m%d).tbz
Because of the v flag tar writes to stdout the name of each
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Chris Jackson c.jack...@shadowcat.co.uk wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd of=$(hostname)-$(date +%Y%m%d).tbz
On 06.02.2010 14:17, Javier Barroso wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Chris Jackson c.jack...@shadowcat.co.uk
wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k
On 06.02.2010 13:39, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
On 04.02.2010 23:09, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd of=$(hostname)-$(date +%Y%m%d).tbz
Because of the v
On 06.02.2010 15:43, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
On 06.02.2010 14:17, Javier Barroso wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Chris Jackson c.jack...@shadowcat.co.uk
wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - *
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Javier Barroso javibarr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:42:45 -0500 (EST), Javier Barroso wrote:
In this case output goes to stderr, so:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd of=$(hostname)-$(date +%Y%m%d).tbz
Because of the v flag tar
Ken Teague wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd of=$(hostname)-$(date +%Y%m%d).tbz
Because of
On 05.02.2010 09:07, Ken Teague wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd of=$(hostname)-$(date
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:20:48 -0500 (EST), Javier Barroso wrote:
If you are using stdout as tar output, including filenames there will
corrupt that output, so it is logical that in this case filenames goes
to stderr.
That does make sense, now that I think about it. I didn't look
closely enough.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:39 AM, bruno bruno.deb...@cyberoso.com wrote:
Why not simply use the t option for content listing :
tar tvf * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES
He's already creating the archive with -v. Why process the archive a
2nd time just to get a listing when it comes from stdout the
Ken Teague wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:39 AM, bruno bruno.deb...@cyberoso.com wrote:
Why not simply use the t option for content listing :
tar tvf * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES
He's already creating the archive with -v. Why process the archive a
2nd time just to get a listing
On 20100205_135919, Alexey Salmin wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Javier Barroso javibarr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:42:45 -0500 (EST), Javier Barroso wrote:
In this case output goes to stderr,
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:44:28 -0500 (EST), bruno wrote:
Ken Teague wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:39 AM, bruno bruno.deb...@cyberoso.com wrote:
Why not simply use the t option for content listing :
tar tvf * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES
He's already creating the archive with -v.
Stephen Powell writes:
I wish the shell supported multi-stream pipelines.
I think you could fake it with tee and a fifo.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Stephen Powell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:44:28 -0500 (EST), bruno wrote:
Ken Teague wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:39 AM, bruno bruno.deb...@cyberoso.com wrote:
Why not simply use the t option for content listing :
tar tvf * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES
He's already creating
Dotan Cohen wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd of=$(hostname)-$(date +%Y%m%d).tbz
Because of the v flag tar writes to stdout the name of each file
copied. How
Dotan Cohen wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd of=$(hostname)-$(date +%Y%m%d).tbz
Because of the v flag tar writes to stdout the name of each file
copied. How
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:39:26 -0500 (EST), John Hasler wrote:
Stephen Powell writes:
I wish the shell supported multi-stream pipelines.
I think you could fake it with tee and a fifo.
Well, I know about tee; but, although I've heard the term fifo,
I know nothing about it in a Linux/Unix/shell
Dotan Cohen wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd of=$(hostname)-$(date +%Y%m%d).tbz
Because of the v flag tar writes to stdout the name of each file
copied. How can I
On Friday 05 February 2010 10:01:45 Paul E Condon wrote:
Traditional Unix and traditional C both made provision for stdin,
stdout, and stderr. When Stroustrup, et al., started working on C++
and its earlier predicessors, someone recognized the need for a fourth
stdXXX, namely stdlog.
If you
Quoting Stephen Powell on 2010-02-04 18:06:58:
but in the general case, it's hard to tell. Since stdout and
stderr both default to the terminal, and since the doc doesn't
say, how else would you know other than by trial and error?
Trial and error is an effective way to figure it out. [1]
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:42:47 -0500 (EST), Bob McGowan wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote:
This is off topic from the OP's question, but one of the things that I
miss in the Linux environment that I used to use a lot in the CMS
environment is CMS Pipelines. The shell supports pipelines, but they
are
On Friday 05 February 2010 14:47:21 Stephen Powell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:42:47 -0500 (EST), Bob McGowan wrote:
Let me give you a
simple example of a CMS pipeline for illustrative purposes,
so that you will get some idea of what I'm talking about.
[snip: Long, but very useful
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Friday 05 February 2010 14:47:21 Stephen Powell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:42:47 -0500 (EST), Bob McGowan wrote:
Let me give you a
simple example of a CMS pipeline for illustrative purposes,
so that you will get some idea of what I'm talking about.
On Friday 05 February 2010 16:33:12 Bob McGowan wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
mkfifo LOCM
mkfifo FIN
(
| NFIND | LOCATE 2 LOCM | FANINANY 2 FIN|
LOCATE LOCM FIN
wait
)
which would disallow having the
parallel processing implied by the above diagram.
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Friday 05 February 2010 16:33:12 Bob McGowan wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
mkfifo LOCM
mkfifo FIN
(
| NFIND | LOCATE 2 LOCM | FANINANY 2 FIN|
LOCATE LOCM FIN
wait
)
which would disallow having the
parallel processing implied by
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:44 AM, bruno bruno.deb...@cyberoso.com wrote:
because it's a simplier way to get the list into a variable
Can you please explain how it's simpler. The method I suggested
certainly isn't as easy, but the method I suggested merely showed a
detailed example. Others here
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Chris Jackson
c.jack...@shadowcat.co.uk wrote:
Use $() like you do with the date command. You have to redirect stderr back
to stdout, which means running it in a subshell:
FILES=$( ( tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k
$1 | dd
On 10-02-04 19:06:58, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:42:45 -0500 (EST), Javier Barroso wrote:
In this case output goes to stderr, so:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES 2 /tmp/data$$ | openssl ...
Is that something you just have to find out by trial and error?
I
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Mart Frauenlob
mart.frauen...@chello.at wrote:
tar ... 2 $filename
mapfile array1 $filename
(don't know actually why '-u 2' option for mapfile does not complete for
me? would make it a 'one-liner'.)
on bash4.0+
This is a great example as well. The only
Ken Teague wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Chris Jackson
c.jack...@shadowcat.co.uk wrote:
Use $() like you do with the date command. You have to redirect stderr back
to stdout, which means running it in a subshell:
FILES=$( ( tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:27:49 -0500 (EST), Bob McGowan wrote:
If someone wanted to, they could write a single program that would read
input/write output from/to two or more descriptors, and use it to create
a multi-path'ed I/O processing sequence, but writing it to prevent
blocking on one
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd of=$(hostname)-$(date +%Y%m%d).tbz
Because of the v flag tar writes to stdout the name of each file
copied. How can I get that output
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:09:28AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd of=$(hostname)-$(date +%Y%m%d).tbz
Because of the v flag tar writes to
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:09:28 -0500 (EST), Dotan Cohen wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd of=$(hostname)-$(date +%Y%m%d).tbz
Because of the v flag tar writes to
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:09:28 -0500 (EST), Dotan Cohen wrote:
I'm scripting a backup solution, the line that does the business looks
like this:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES | openssl des3 -salt -k $1 |
dd
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:42:45 -0500 (EST), Javier Barroso wrote:
In this case output goes to stderr, so:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES 2 /tmp/data$$ | openssl ...
Is that something you just have to find out by trial and error?
I checked the man page for tar, and there's nothing in
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:42:45 -0500 (EST), Javier Barroso wrote:
In this case output goes to stderr, so:
tar -zcvf - * --exclude-from $EXCLUDES 2 /tmp/data$$ | openssl ...
Is that something you just have to find out by
39 matches
Mail list logo
