Re: Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 12:48:52AM -0500, dick thompson wrote: > I have looked all through the info and the best I can find is that Etch > uses version 2.6.18 of the Linux kernel. Since the stable version was > put out there in the early part of Jan 2008, that seems like a very old > version to

Re: Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

On Sunday 27 January 2008 00:48, dick thompson wrote: > I have looked all through the info and the best I can find is that Etch > uses version 2.6.18 of the Linux kernel. Since the stable version was > put out there in the early part of Jan 2008, that seems like a very old > version to be releasin

Re: Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/08 01:54, Chris Henry wrote: On Jan 27, 2008 3:41 PM, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2008-01-27 08:23 +0100, David Palmer wrote: Then you need to upgrade to the 'lenny' distribution.

Re: Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 08:41:43 +0100 Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-01-27 08:23 +0100, David Palmer wrote: > > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:48:52 -0500 > > dick thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> My ethernet adapter is an ATTANSIC Gigabyte L1 (also released since the > >> t

Re: Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/08 01:54, Chris Henry wrote: On Jan 27, 2008 3:41 PM, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2008-01-27 08:23 +0100, David Palmer wrote: Then you need to upgrade to the 'lenny' distribution. Or depending on what you

Re: Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/08 01:54, Chris Henry wrote: > On Jan 27, 2008 3:41 PM, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 2008-01-27 08:23 +0100, David Palmer wrote: >>> Then you need to upgrade to the 'lenny' distribution. >>> Or depending on what you are runnin

Re: Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

On Jan 27, 2008 3:41 PM, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-01-27 08:23 +0100, David Palmer wrote: > > Then you need to upgrade to the 'lenny' distribution. > > Or depending on what you are running, even SID. > > That's my standard desktop now. > > Please stop giving such clueless an

Re: Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

On 2008-01-27 08:23 +0100, David Palmer wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:48:52 -0500 > dick thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> My ethernet adapter is an ATTANSIC Gigabyte L1 (also released since the >> takeover of ATTANSIC by ATHEROS as the ATHEROS Gigabyte L1. From what I >> have been able

Re: Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:48:52 -0500 dick thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have looked all through the info and the best I can find is that Etch > uses version 2.6.18 of the Linux kernel. Right! Are you running a mission critical server? > > My ethernet adapter is an ATTANSIC Gigabyte L

Re: Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 12:51:15AM -0500, dick thompson wrote: > I have looked all through the info and the best I can find is that Etch > uses version 2.6.18 of the Linux kernel. Since the stable version was > put out there in the early part of Jan 2008, that seems like a very old > version to be

Re: Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

On Jan 26, 2008 9:48 PM, dick thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have looked all through the info and the best I can find is that Etch > uses version 2.6.18 of the Linux kernel. Since the stable version was > put out there in the early part of Jan 2008, that seems like a very old > version to

Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

I have looked all through the info and the best I can find is that Etch uses version 2.6.18 of the Linux kernel. Since the stable version was put out there in the early part of Jan 2008, that seems like a very old version to be releasing. Am I right that this is the version in use? If so that do

Brief question as to the Linux kernel in use in the Stable version of Etch

I have looked all through the info and the best I can find is that Etch uses version 2.6.18 of the Linux kernel. Since the stable version was put out there in the early part of Jan 2008, that seems like a very old version to be releasing. Am I right that this is the version in use? If so tha

Re: Brief Apt-Get and KDE Question

David R. Litwin wrote: > > > On 14/06/05, *Roberto C. Sanchez* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:18:42AM -0400, David R. Litwin wrote: > > I have recently gotten KDE 3.4.1 from deb > > http://pkg-KDE.alioth.debian.org/kde-3.4.1/ ./ w

Re: Brief Apt-Get and KDE Question

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 10:43:28PM -0400, David R. Litwin wrote: > On 14/06/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:18:42AM -0400, David R. Litwin wrote: > > > I have recently gotten KDE 3.4.1 from deb > > > http://pkg-KDE.alioth.debian.org/kde-3.4.1/ .

Re: Brief Apt-Get and KDE Question

On 14/06/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:18:42AM -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:> I have recently gotten KDE 3.4.1 from deb> http://pkg-KDE.alioth.debian.org/kde-3.4.1/ ./ which is apparently a> legitimate debian site from which to get KDE. Now, after doi

Re: Brief Apt-Get and KDE Question

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:18:42AM -0400, David R. Litwin wrote: > I have recently gotten KDE 3.4.1 from deb > http://pkg-KDE.alioth.debian.org/kde-3.4.1/ ./ which is apparently a > legitimate debian site from which to get KDE. Now, after doing the usual > apt-get and apt-upgrade (and dist-upgra

Brief Apt-Get and KDE Question

I have recently gotten KDE 3.4.1 from deb http://pkg-KDE.alioth.debian.org/kde-3.4.1/ ./ which is apparently a legitimate debian site from which to get KDE. Now, after doing the usual apt-get and apt-upgrade (and dist-upgrade: I wanted the latest version of Sarge, but I don't think that matters her

Re: Ever heard of Brief?

On March 22, 2004 01:35, Shot wrote: > Hello. > > Please don't start a new thread by replaying to > a previous message from list, or at least delete > the In-Reply-To: headers; it's messing up threading. > > Anil Gupte: > > One particularly neat feature was the ability to cut and paste > > columns.

Re: Ever heard of Brief?

Hello. Please don't start a new thread by replaying to a previous message from list, or at least delete the In-Reply-To: headers; it's messing up threading. Anil Gupte: > One particularly neat feature was the ability to cut and paste > columns. I have never since found an editor that does that o

Re: Ever heard of Brief?

On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 10:39:06PM -0600, Anil Gupte spake thus: > Once upon a time, long, long ago there was an editor called BRIEF (by > Underware). Yes, they were an Aussie firm. Anyway, this was my favorite > editor for the longest time in DOS - I am dating myself here aren&

Ever heard of Brief?

Once upon a time, long, long ago there was an editor called BRIEF (by Underware). Yes, they were an Aussie firm. Anyway, this was my favorite editor for the longest time in DOS - I am dating myself here aren't I? One particularly neat feature was the ability to cut and paste column

Brief Grimaldi's Lounge & Office

Title: Grimaldi's Lounge & Office

problem with cups and g-brief

Hello, I am using Debian unstable with Kernel 2.4.0, and yesterday finally made the transition from lprng to cups. Everything works quite well, except for a single problem with the LaTeX package g-brief: Compared to the printout with lprng, the printout of g-brief is now shifted upwards for about

Re: Brief

Blazej Sawionek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Once upon a time there was a text editor called `Brief'. > > Does it exist in Linux version? I'm reasonably sure that BRIEF was only available for DOS. There's a closed, proprietary editor called CRiSP (www.crisp.

Brief

Once upon a time there was a text editor called `Brief'. Does it exist in Linux version? Blazej

Re: brief (yet stupid) question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Lucas wrote: > running debian 2.1r2 > > i'm here: > > http://home.netscape.com/download/unsupported.html > > and i have to select between Linux 1.2 and 2.2 > > which one? Go here and pick "Linux 2.0 (glibc)", that's what slink has AFAIK

brief (yet stupid) question

running debian 2.1r2 i'm here: http://home.netscape.com/download/unsupported.html and i have to select between Linux 1.2 and 2.2 which one? thanks PS please cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

brief legal analysis on PINE

I'm a law student not a lawyer, but here is some amateur analysis on the pine(TM) issue. It appears Univ. of Washington (UW) allows redistribution of the source in tar and gzip format. It allows modification with .diff files for commercial and non-commercial purposes, so long as the modifier mak