Carlos Carvalho writes (Re: Bug#3038: SOLVED: can't remove print jobs):
Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 17 May 1996 14:24:
...
This means that kill(,0) is almost always a mistake.
Could you check to see whether lpr is failing to check this, and if so
report it as a bug ?
It's
Rick Macdonald writes (Bug#3038: SOLVED: can't remove print jobs):
On Thu, 16 May 1996, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
I also found that lockchk in line 156 of rmjob.c is doing a
if (kill(cur_daemon, 0) 0) {
I don't think it's right to send a signal number 0, at least it's
Package: lpr
Version: 5.9-11
Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 17 May 1996 14:24:
Rick Macdonald writes (Bug#3038: SOLVED: can't remove print jobs):
On Thu, 16 May 1996, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
I also found that lockchk in line 156 of rmjob.c is doing a
if (kill
3 matches
Mail list logo
