On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 07:25 -0500, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:32:38PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> > > The current PSI works perfectly but I don't like the pale green prompt.
> > >
> > > Tried editing .bashrd , /ext/fprofile and /ext/bash.bashrc but n
On 29/1/24 22:54, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:29:57PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
On 26/01/24 at 20:50, David Wright wrote:
I'll give a shout-out for Hack,¹ which I can't fault for use in
xterms. Comparingxterm -geometry 80x25+0+0 -fa hack -fs 16
with xterm -geome
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:54:44PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:29:57PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
> > Those symbols are very nice, which tool have you used to insert them?
>
> Easy. I configured my CAPSLOCK key (which is useless IMO) to be
> my X compose key. So
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:29:57PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
> On 26/01/24 at 20:50, David Wright wrote: > I'll give a shout-out for Hack,¹
> which I can't fault for use in > xterms. Comparing xterm -geometry 80x25+0+0
> -fa hack -fs 16 > with xterm -geometry 80x25+0 Sangu verification:
> ⓘ No
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:29:57PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
> On 26/01/24 at 20:50, David Wright wrote:
> > I'll give a shout-out for Hack,¹ which I can't fault for use in
> > xterms. Comparingxterm -geometry 80x25+0+0 -fa hack -fs 16
> > with xterm -geometry 80x25+0+0 -fa inconsolata -f
On 26/01/24 at 20:50, David Wright wrote:
I'll give a shout-out for Hack,¹ which I can't fault for use in
xterms. Comparingxterm -geometry 80x25+0+0 -fa hack -fs 16
with xterm -geometry 80x25+0+0 -fa inconsolata -fs 18
(to make the sizes roughly the same), I find the inconsolata
stroke widt
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 01:50:38PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 26 Jan 2024 at 07:25:13 (-0500), Dan Ritter wrote:
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:32:38PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> > The current PSI works perfectly but I don't like the pale green prompt.
> >
> > Tried
>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 07:42:30AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Might be time for a new font. I like Inconsolata, but l1I!
> should never look similar, nor O0@ or S$.
My eyesight sucks like a black hole with daddy issues, so I like fonts
that are a bit larger than most. My favorites on xte
On Fri 26 Jan 2024 at 07:25:13 (-0500), Dan Ritter wrote:
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:32:38PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> > > The current PSI works perfectly but I don't like the pale green prompt.
> > >
> > > Tried editing .bashrd , /ext/fprofile and /ext/bash.bashrc
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 07:25:13AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Might be time for a new font. I like Inconsolata, but l1I!
> should never look similar, nor O0@ or S$.
Indeed. Also, ({[ and )}] are character groups that must be visibly
different, or else any terminal or programming work you do is g
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:32:38PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> > The current PSI works perfectly but I don't like the pale green prompt.
> >
> > Tried editing .bashrd , /ext/fprofile and /ext/bash.bashrc but no changes to
> > the PSI definition had any effect
>
> You app
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:32:38PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> The current PSI works perfectly but I don't like the pale green prompt.
>
> Tried editing .bashrd , /ext/fprofile and /ext/bash.bashrc but no changes to
> the PSI definition had any effect
You appear to be asking about the shell pro
The current PSI works perfectly but I don't like the pale green prompt.
Tried editing .bashrd , /ext/fprofile and /ext/bash.bashrc but no
changes to the PSI definition had any effect
Searched for PSI and found
/usr/src/linux-headers-6.1.0-16-amd64/include/config/PSI
/usr/src/linux-headers-6.1
13 matches
Mail list logo
