Hi all,
I installed ColdFusion MX (6.1) on Debian stable (note: Debian is not
supported by Macromedia).
The installer initially moaned about not having compat-libstdc++ RPM
installed. I grabbed a RedHat RPM of compat-libstdc++, aliened it, and
installed it. Of course, the installer is only
Anyone have any luck getting Coldfusion MX to install on Debian stable?
I just tried the ColdFusion MX (6.1) installer , but it complained:
Warning: C++ compatibility pack
The installer was unable to determine if the C++ compatibility pack is
installed by running
installing ColdFusion MX (6.1), but the installer quickly
complained:
Warning: C++ compatibility pack
The installer was unable to determine if the C++ compatibility pack is
installed by running the following command: rpm --query compat-libstdc++
If this machine
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:56:43PM -0800, nate wrote:
eric lin said:
Dear Linuxer;
I tried to install macromedia's coldfusion MX
6/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file
probably cannot use it on debian woody. it is linked against glibc 2.0
which
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:26:18 +
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:56:43PM -0800, nate wrote:
eric lin said:
Dear Linuxer;
I tried to install macromedia's coldfusion MX
6/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 07:54:40AM -0500, Shawn Lamson wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:26:18 +
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric, you need to get a fixed version of Java that doesn't use internal
libc symbols like this, in order that it can work with glibc 2.3.1. Or
else run
Dear Linuxer;
I tried to install macromedia's coldfusion MX
but I meet error
Error occurred during initialization of VM
Unable to load native library:
/tmp/install.dir.24128/Linux/resource/jre/lib/i38
6/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file
libc.so.
6
eric lin said:
Dear Linuxer;
I tried to install macromedia's coldfusion MX
6/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file
probably cannot use it on debian woody. it is linked against glibc 2.0
which is really old. I think debian hamm(1998) was the most recent
that seem is a big defect, since what old can use , but new can not.
Would any body have opinion so that. New should improve not retrograde
eric
nate wrote:
eric lin said:
Dear Linuxer;
I tried to install macromedia's coldfusion MX
6/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0
macromedia's coldfusion MX
6/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file
probably cannot use it on debian woody. it is linked against glibc 2.0
which is really old. I think debian hamm(1998) was the most recent version
of debian to sport glibc 2.0
I am
10 matches
Mail list logo
