On 2010-06-28 21:32 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-06-28 21:07 +0200, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote:
(for me -O3 is stable... I didn't had any problem with it)
Depends on the program, I think. In general, -O3 produces bigger
binaries (than -O2) that may or may not run faster. Mozilla even
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 03:07:53PM -0400, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote:
I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm
tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to
add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly packages
are built against i386
I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm
tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to
add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly packages
are built against i386 architecture, and for me it is waste of my CPU
capabilities;
for
On 2010-06-28 21:07 +0200, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote:
I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm
tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to
add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly packages
are built against i386 architecture,
2010/6/28 Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de:
On 2010-06-28 21:07 +0200, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote:
I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm
tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to
add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly
5 matches
Mail list logo
