On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
it has been great. Extremeley quiet (I chose a 600 MHz fanless Eden CPU
Ding.
Cyrix Cpu, and like all cyrix's, low in performance(which is the whole
point of this cpu being low power) Memory bus is likely slow to go with
it.
# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
Pigeon wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 11:15:00AM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
I am really stumped on this.
Just a random sparkle of the neurons, but have you somehow got your
FSB clocked really slow in the BIOS? What sort of figures does
memtest86 report for memory access speed?
That wasn't it.
Johann Koenig wrote:
On Friday April 9 at 06:42pm
Warren Dodge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2004, at 10:00 AM, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
My only complaint is that my hdparm performance seems to suck quite
badly:
# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.85
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 11:15:00AM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Johann Koenig wrote:
On Friday April 9 at 06:42pm Warren Dodge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2004, at 10:00 AM, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
My only complaint is that my hdparm performance seems to suck quite
badly:
Pigeon wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 11:15:00AM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Your is probably UDMA 133. Mine is a Maxtor Diamond Max 120 GB, and
it is UDMA 133. My other box, with a Western Digital UDMA 100 drive,
gets like 800-900 MB/s in buffer-cache reads.
I am really stumped on this.
On Saturday April 10 at 11:15am
Roberto Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disk is a Maxtor 8mb 160gb 7200rpm, on a VIA chipset:
mental-graffiti:/proc/ide# lspci
...snip...
:00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE
I just recently replaced my server (a venerable Pentium Pro 200) with
a MiniITX VIA-based box that is about 25% smaller than my VCR. So far,
it has been great. Extremeley quiet (I chose a 600 MHz fanless Eden CPU
for nearly all passive cooling) and small enough to fit almost anywhere.
My only
On Apr 9, 2004, at 10:00 AM, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
My only complaint is that my hdparm performance seems to suck quite
badly:
# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.85 seconds = 69.19 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.53 seconds = 41.83 MB/sec
On Friday April 9 at 06:42pm
Warren Dodge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2004, at 10:00 AM, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
My only complaint is that my hdparm performance seems to suck quite
badly:
# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.85 seconds =
9 matches
Mail list logo
