Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 29/12/2017 à 18:27, Andrew W a écrit :
>>
>> On 27/12/2017 13:18, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>>> Current BIND9 defaults to doing DNSSEC verification. DNSSEC needs large
>>> packets. You might have an issue with UDP fragments being dropped at
>>>
Le 29/12/2017 à 18:27, Andrew W a écrit :
On 27/12/2017 13:18, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Current BIND9 defaults to doing DNSSEC verification. DNSSEC needs large
packets. You might have an issue with UDP fragments being dropped at
your firewall/NAT Gateway?
Thanks for this tip. Looking into it I
On 27/12/2017 13:18, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Current BIND9 defaults to doing DNSSEC verification. DNSSEC needs large
packets. You might have an issue with UDP fragments being dropped at
your firewall/NAT Gateway?
Thanks for this tip. Looking into it I discovered TCP seems to be
recommened
Andrew Wood wrote:
Hi,
> I have a server which acts as a DNS server for our LAN. All our internal
> servers have A records on it using a .local domain and it forwards all
> other requests out to the root servers using the in built list provided
> with BIND. All clients on
Andrew W wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone have any ideas please?
>
I had the same experience - I think (after trying this and that) the
solution was ntp (time was behind on the server), but I am not really 100%.
I was thinking first it has something to do with ipv6 or firewall, but after
updating
I have a server which acts as a DNS server for our LAN. All our internal
servers have A records on it using a .local domain and it forwards all
other requests out to the root servers using the in built list provided
with BIND. All clients on the LAN have this machine set as their only
DNS
I have a server which acts as a DNS server for our LAN. All our internal
servers have A records on it using a .local domain and it forwards all
other requests out to the root servers using the in built list provided
with BIND. All clients on the LAN have this machine set as their only
DNS
Rafał Radecki pisze:
Witam wszystkich.
Aktualnie ćwiczę połączenie DHCP z DNS. Wykonuję polecenie
rndc-confgen w celu generacji klucza i konfiguracji, które:
a) umieszczam w nowo utworzonym (po usunięciu /etc/bind/rndc.key)
pliku /etc/bind/rndc.conf:
# Start of rndc.conf
key rndc-key {
Witam wszystkich.
Aktualnie ćwiczę połączenie DHCP z DNS. Wykonuję polecenie rndc-confgen w
celu generacji klucza i konfiguracji, które:
a) umieszczam w nowo utworzonym (po usunięciu /etc/bind/rndc.key) pliku
/etc/bind/rndc.conf:
# Start of rndc.conf
key rndc-key {
algorithm hmac-md5;
Hi there
I am running a VMWare Server 2 on Ubuntu Jaunty and 2 Debian (testing)
clients in it, which get their IP address automatically (and variably)
through DHCP. The latter does work without a clitch. Unfortunately, I
cannot access the two clients through hostname, even though they are
In alpine.lrh.2.00.0907081228210.5...@tor.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de, Andre' John
wrote:
I am running a VMWare Server 2 on Ubuntu Jaunty and 2 Debian (testing)
clients in it, which get their IP address automatically (and variably)
through DHCP. The latter does work without a clitch. Unfortunately, I
On 2009-06-25, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I updated my testing system, as usual, this morning, but then
suspended my machine (so everything worked as it had been all day).
This evening, I rebooted, and suddenly no sites could be found.
(Other machines on my network did not have the problem.)
I updated my testing system, as usual, this morning, but then
suspended my machine (so everything worked as it had been all day).
This evening, I rebooted, and suddenly no sites could be found.
(Other machines on my network did not have the problem.) Putting the
IP addresses of the nameservers as
Hi!
It's a really strange problem, and my network skills are not the best
ones. Sometimes when I'm browsing something it suddenly redirects me to
/?dl=1 of where I am.
That gives me an annoying message: The document you requested was not
found. May we suggest our home page?
Sometimes apt,
Another thing.
And what's been happening usually is that when I'm browsing I brake in
the following URL with nothing printed on the screen:
http://domains.googlesyndication.com/apps/domainpark/domainpark.cgi?client=ca-dp-mdnhref=http%3A%2F%2F
Jeff D on 10/08/07 04:07, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 09/08/07 00:55, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
How exactly would I set the domain name on the machine - the name I
thought I'd chosen when setting up the system from CD?
At the moment on this
Jeff D on 09/08/07 00:55, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients.
However it
doesn't recognise any internal
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 09/08/07 00:55, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients.
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hostname
isengard
isengard:~# hostname
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't
recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hostname
isengard
isengard:~# hostname --fqdn
hostname: Unknown host
isengard:~# nslookup gondor
Server:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't
recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hostname
isengard
isengard:~# hostname --fqdn
hostname: Unknown host
On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Adam Hardy wrote:
Something is rewriting my resolv.conf at least every minute. I
suspected it must be dnsmasq attempting to do the DNS but I just
stopped dnsmasq, and yet resolv.conf is still being updated. I had
a look over my ps output but dont see anything
I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network of 4
PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet browsing,
ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
Now I am trying to get DNS to work for local machines but it won't co-operate. I
spent the last couple of
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
of 4 PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet
browsing, ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
Now I am trying to get DNS to work for local
Douglas Allan Tutty on 06/08/07 14:27, wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
of 4 PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet
browsing, ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
On Aug 6, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Adam Hardy wrote:
Please send us your /etc/hosts file. Every box needs a minimal
/etc/hosts file with at least its own hostname (though I'v never used
DHCP). The box running dnsmasq should have all the hosts on your
network listed in /etc/hosts for dnsmasq to
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty on 06/08/07 14:27, wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
of 4 PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was
David Brodbeck on 06/08/07 19:11, wrote:
On Aug 6, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
of
4
PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet
browsing,
ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
Now I am trying to get DNS to work for local machines but it won't co-
operate. I
spent the last
Moin,
ich versuche vergeblich die Seite http://amelina.fatal-maps.de
aufzurufen. Mozilla sagt mir:
amelina.fatal-maps.de konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie den
Namen und wiederholen Sie den Vorgang.
fatal-maps.de selbst ist allerdings errreichbar (wenn auch coming
soon, weil die
Am Dienstag, 13. Juni 2006 16:00 schrieb Rüdiger Noack:
amelina.fatal-maps.de
funktioniert bei mir ohne probleme
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 04:00:51PM +0200, Rüdiger Noack wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host fatal-maps.de
fatal-maps.de A 85.214.55.122
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host amelina.fatal-maps.de
amelina.fatal-maps.de does not exist, try again
Ändert ein Wechsel des Nameservers etwas am
Ulf Volmer schrieb:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 04:00:51PM +0200, Rüdiger Noack wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host fatal-maps.de
fatal-maps.de A 85.214.55.122
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host amelina.fatal-maps.de
amelina.fatal-maps.de does not exist, try again
Ändert ein Wechsel des
Hi everyone,
Nslookup/ping work, irc works, i can connect to most websites but
having trouble with certain websites such as google/gmail, says can't
find host, then after refresh same error, after many refreshes it
works, for each refresh it generates an error in /var/log/syslog
saying ICMP
Hello,
try entering your IPS's dns servers in the file:
/etc/resolv.conf
i.e.
echo nameserver xx.yy.zz.ww /etc/resolv.conf
where xx.yy.zz.www is the nameserver your ISP provides
for you.
It is strange however, that irc and pings work ...
Maybe that is a temporary error, or someone within
Problem SOLVED by WORKAROUND!
Das Problem scheint mit einer nicht ganz korrekten Behandlung von DHCP
release zusammen zu haengen. Unter Linux/Kanotix kann ich sehen, das beim
shutdown ein DHCP release gemacht wird. Das kann ich unter M$ nicht
verifizieren. Mache ich aber unter M$ ein ipconfig
Hi Linuxer,
ich habe ein Problem mit meinem Fritz DSL Router. Den wuerde ich gerne als
DNS/DHCP Server fuer meine Linux Kisten benutzen. DHCP funktioniert,
allerdings sehe ich als DNS Hostname Eintrag auf dem Fritz nur noname.
Boote ich selbe Maschine unter M$ sehe ich den richtigen Namen im DNS
Hi Matthias,
ich habe ein Problem mit meinem Fritz DSL Router. Den wuerde ich gerne als
DNS/DHCP Server fuer meine Linux Kisten benutzen. DHCP funktioniert,
allerdings sehe ich als DNS Hostname Eintrag auf dem Fritz nur noname.
Boote ich selbe Maschine unter M$ sehe ich den richtigen Namen im
Hi Tobias,
Hi Matthias,
ich habe ein Problem mit meinem Fritz DSL Router. Den wuerde ich gerne
als
DNS/DHCP Server fuer meine Linux Kisten benutzen. DHCP funktioniert,
allerdings sehe ich als DNS Hostname Eintrag auf dem Fritz nur noname.
Boote ich selbe Maschine unter M$ sehe ich
Hi Matthias,
dito bei mir (Fritz!Box Fon WLAN). Aber ich kann ohne weiteres damit
leben. Warum brauchst du es denn?
Ist so schoen bequem, nicht irgendwie die IP von einem Rechner raus
zuknobeln, sondern ihn via ssh hostname anzusprechen. Dafuer gibt es doch
DNS. Natuerlich gibt es unter Linux
On 10/30/05, marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Purser said...
On 10/29/05, marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have three machines in a small network: one XP, two Linux - let's call
them xp, tux1 and tux2. xp connects to the Internet via a dial-up modem.
Internet Connection Sharing (ICS)
On 10/29/05, marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have three machines in a small network: one XP, two Linux - let's call
them xp, tux1 and tux2. xp connects to the Internet via a dial-up modem.
Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) is enable and works fine. ICS forces
xp's IP to be 192.168.0.1, so the
I need to see the Bind configuration files to resolve your problem.
Regards,
Eriberto
RituRaj escreveu:
... while talking to smtp.pspl.co.in.:
MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=3535954
451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve
Deferred: 451 4.1.8 Domain of
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 10:47:50PM -0800, RituRaj wrote:
I have DNS problem. THe mails from our company sent
outside have started buncing with following error. It
was working till yesterday...
... while talking to smtp.pspl.co.in.:
MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=3535954
451 4.1.8
I have DNS problem. THe mails from our company sent
outside have started buncing with following error. It
was working till yesterday...
... while talking to smtp.pspl.co.in.:
MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=3535954
451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve
Deferred
I recently upgraded the kernel from 2.4.26 to 2.6.3.
Everything works, but Mozilla is now unusable. When I
go to a URL, it just sits there with (e.g.)
Resolving host login.yahoo.com
at the bottom in the status frame, for about 40
seconds. Thinking I maybe had some DNS setup problem,
I tried
in mozilla (you don't specify version) type about: config in the
address bar and from there you may be able to see if there's a
CheckHostIP (or similar) option.
-d.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently upgraded the kernel from 2.4.26 to 2.6.3.
Everything works, but Mozilla is now unusable. When
--- David Piniella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
in mozilla (you don't specify version) type about:
config in the
address bar and from there you may be able to see if
there's a
CheckHostIP (or similar) option.
-d.
Thanks for the suggestion. The only option I could see
that looked as though
Ich habe nun das Problem vorerst anderweitig erledigt. Wenn ich auf
dnsmasq verzichte und bei meinen Rechnern hinter dem Router ans
nameserver den DNS des ISP angebe, wird die DNS-Anfrage durch ipmasq
hindurch erledigt. Ich dachte nur, die Idee mit dnsmasq wäre etwas
variabler.
FG
--
Haeufig
Bislang hatte ich nur einen Rechner mit Hilfe von iptables gesichert und
war damit auch recht zufrieden. Mittlerweile sollten 2-3 Rechner über
einen Router (Woody3.0r2) mit Modemanschluss die Möglichkeit haben ins
Internet zu gehen. Natürlich sollte auf diesem die Firewall laufen. Das
ist
am 13.05.2004, um 10:51:08 +0200 mailte Frank Geschner folgendes:
Bislang hatte ich nur einen Rechner mit Hilfe von iptables gesichert und
war damit auch recht zufrieden. Mittlerweile sollten 2-3 Rechner über
Eins mal gleich vorweg: Paketfilter dienen nicht dazu, schlampige
Konfigurationen zu
moin,
ich habe einen router für t-dsl mit debian. allerdings habe ich unheimlich
probleme mit dem dns. wenn ich irgendwas anpinge, wo er erstmal die IP
rausbekommen muss, dauert das ewig (egal ob von einem netzwerkrechner oder
vom router selber). das stört natürlich überall, nicht zuletzt beim
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 21:55, Malte Bartenwerfer wrote:
moin,
ich habe einen router für t-dsl mit debian. allerdings habe ich unheimlich
probleme mit dem dns. wenn ich irgendwas anpinge, wo er erstmal die IP
rausbekommen muss, dauert das ewig
Ein paar Gegenfragen:
Erstmal: was heißt ewig?
Malte Bartenwerfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ich habe einen router für t-dsl mit debian. allerdings habe ich unheimlich
probleme mit dem dns. wenn ich irgendwas anpinge, wo er erstmal die IP
rausbekommen muss, dauert das ewig (egal ob von einem netzwerkrechner oder
vom router selber).
so du
Hallo Leute,
ich habe einen woody-squid 2.4.6-2 proxy und einen
woody-bind 9.2.1-2 als 'caching only nameserver' am Laufen.
Mein Problem ist, dass _teilweise_ neue Seiten bis zu 15 sek.
hängen. Ab und an bekomme ich bis zu einem SHIFT+RELOAD einen
DNS-lookup error.
Das System dreht Däumchen,
J Y writes:
Oct 13 23:56:29 deblnx pppd[1302]: not replacing existing default route
to tap0 [0.0.0.0]
This is your problem. You've got diald installed. Purge it.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you all. You folks are TOPS!! I did an apt-get remove diald and
manually removed /var/cache/diald and it works!! my shell knowledge is
at a fledgling level so thamks for all the help. I hope I wasn't too
much of a bother. I went to the archives to look at the thread. I am off
the list
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:11:31PM -0800, J Y wrote:
Thank you all. You folks are TOPS!! I did an apt-get remove diald and
manually removed /var/cache/diald and it works!! my shell knowledge is
at a fledgling level so thamks for all the help. I hope I wasn't too
much of a bother. I went to
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:11:31PM -0800, J Y wrote:
I am off
the list again. I can't always check my mail every couple of hours. Most
of the problem is the swen. ( I must get a hundred and fifty messages
that look like they're from microsoft, daily)
Well, you'll still need to check your mail
Hi, After getting grub to work and booting with the k7 kernel rather
than the bf2.4 the DNS problem returned..or that's what I think I'm
seeing-basically a conection that doesn't work. So I ran plog, I got an
exit status 1; I put exit 0 in the 6 scripts in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d
Oct 13 12:34:57
In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
Hi, After getting grub to work and booting with the k7 kernel rather
than the bf2.4 the DNS problem returned..or that's what I think I'm
seeing-basically a conection that doesn't work. So I ran plog, I got an
exit status 1; I put exit 0 in the 6 scripts in /etc
with the k7 kernel rather
than the bf2.4 the DNS problem returned..or that's what I think I'm
seeing-basically a conection that doesn't work. So I ran plog, I got an
exit status 1; I put exit 0 in the 6 scripts in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d
Oct 13 12:34:57 deblnx pppd[1328]: not replacing existing
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:01:57AM -0800, J Y wrote:
Hi, After getting grub to work and booting with the k7 kernel rather
than the bf2.4 the DNS problem returned..or that's what I think I'm
seeing-basically a conection that doesn't work. So I ran plog, I got an
exit status 1; I put exit 0
Pigeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:01:57AM -0800, J Y wrote:
Hi, After getting grub to work and booting with the k7 kernel rather
than the bf2.4 the DNS problem returned..or that's what I think I'm
seeing-basically a conection that doesn't work. So I ran plog, I got an
exit
I changed some permissions but it didn't fix the problem. I did notice
that pon highstream.net doesn't produce anything-no modem dial. kppp
does get the modem to dial. The following output is too long and I
didn't know what might be relevent.
deblnx:~# ls -l /etc/resolv.conf
-rw-r--r--1
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 at 04:27 GMT, J Y penned:
Hi, Yeah I thought of that (resov.conf being a directory rather than a
file) but it is a file. I meant to include that in the post and
forgot. I'll run the command just to be sure though. You have the
command as ls-ld /etc/resov.conf is the 'd' in
If you want the networking info from winxp just do this.
Start-Run-cmd
then when the command prompt window pops up type
ipconfig /all
it will print all windows networking info. Voila you have your nameservers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hallo Stefan,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:10:47 +0200 (CEST) Stefan Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Für Bind kann ich das nicht sagen, djbdns kann das definitiv.
IIRC muss man nur die IP-Adresse des DNS in eine Datei mit dem
Domainnamen schreiben. Ich kann, wenn ich wieder zuhause bin mal
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:01:18 +0200 Sebastian Heinlein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aus der manpage zu named.conf:
zone domain_name [ ( in | hs | hesiod | chaos ) ] {
type forward;
[ forward ( only | first ); ]
[ forwarders { [ ip_addr ; [ ip_addr ; ... ] ] }; ]
Hallo,
ich habe hier ein DNS-Problem, bei dem ich nicht weiss, ob das
ueberhaupt vernuenftig loesbar ist, aber vielleicht hat ja irgendjemand
von Euch eine Idee.
Also, die Situation ist folgende: Ich habe hier einen Debian-Server, den
ich (u.a.) als ISDN-Router und DNS-Server nutze. Verbindungen
Am Mit, 2003-09-03 um 16.16 schrieb Albrecht Lohoefener:
===
127.0.0.1 localhost
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
# (added automatically by netbase upgrade)
::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1
I just spent a couple of hours diagnosing a DNS lookup problem, but I
have no clue what's causing the problem. If I do a
host junker.whatever.gov
it's trying to do a lookup over the loopback interface. This times out
eventually. If I do a
host junker.whatever.gov 134.xxx.xxx.xxx
Gary Hennigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just spent a couple of hours diagnosing a DNS lookup problem, but I
have no clue what's causing the problem. If I do a
host junker.whatever.gov
it's trying to do a lookup over the loopback interface. This times out
eventually. If I do a
Am Dienstag 02 September 2003 17:19 schrieb Hugo Wau:
Die einfachste Methode der Namensaufloesung ist die Datei /etc/hosts.
man hosts
Cu
In meiner /etc/hosts seht:
===
127.0.0.1 localhost
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
# (added automatically by netbase
Am Montag 01 September 2003 21:41 schrieb Wolfgang Fischer:
Wenn das das Problem ist, hat das ganze wirklich nichts mit DNS zu tun.
Um die Ursache des Problems zu finden, sollte man versuchen, eine
statische IP zu pingen.
Das pingen zu statischen IP's funktioniert, nur DNS funzt nicht.
Ich
Am Die, 2003-09-02 um 15.12 schrieb Albrecht Lohoefener:
Das pingen zu statischen IP's funktioniert, nur DNS funzt nicht.
Ich habe jetzt mal versucht die Netzwerkkarte mit einem Modul einzubinden -
das gleiche Ergebnis.
Die einfachste Methode der Namensaufloesung ist die Datei /etc/hosts.
Damien Solley schrieb:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 17:47, Jörg Johannes wrote:
Hi everybody.
My father has a Win XP box with a builtin DSL card (no linux driver
available AFAIK, it's a Eicon Diva DSL). So the only possibility to get
my Linux laptop connected to the net when I am at home is to let XP
Good evening (or perhaps morning where you are),
* J?rg Johannes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030902 16:56]:
There are only two IP's listed in the details field. My own one
(Client-IP) and the dial-in server's (Server-IP). No DNS listed :(
But anyhow: I have set some important IP adresses to my
Hello
Martin Reid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Monday 01 September 2003 8:47 am, Jörg Johannes wrote:
My father has a Win XP box with a builtin DSL card (no linux driver
available AFAIK, it's a Eicon Diva DSL). So the only possibility to
get my Linux laptop connected to the net when I am
Hallo ML,
ich habe ein Problem mit meiner DNS Einstellung. Wenn ich mein Rechner
hochfahre wird die Netzwerkkarte richtig initialisiert, nur DNS funktioniert
nicht. Wenn ich dann /etc/init.d/networking restart ausführe kommt
Reconfiguring network interfaces ... SIOCDELRT: No such process done.
reinkompiliert. Habe ich dort eine Schalter vergessen an
zu schalten? Ich nutze den 2.4.21 Kernel und Debian Testing.
Hallo Albrecht,
Wie Du schon andeutest denke ich dass, das DNS-Problem die Folge eines
Treiberproblems ist.
Welche Karte hast Du und welche Treiber hast Du dafuer fest einkomiliert
Am Montag 01 September 2003 13:24 schrieb Hugo Wau:
Hallo Albrecht,
Wie Du schon andeutest denke ich dass, das DNS-Problem die Folge eines
Treiberproblems ist.
Welche Karte hast Du und welche Treiber hast Du dafuer fest einkomiliert
bzw. als Module geladen?
Was sagt dmesg in den Zeilen der
Am Montag 01 September 2003 13:24 schrieb Hugo Wau:
Hallo Albrecht,
Wie Du schon andeutest denke ich dass, das DNS-Problem die Folge eines
Treiberproblems ist.
Welche Karte hast Du und welche Treiber hast Du dafuer fest einkomiliert
bzw. als Module geladen?
Was sagt dmesg in den Zeilen der
Am Mon, 2002-04-29 um 02.07 schrieb Albrecht Lohoefener:
dmesg gibt aus:
eth0: Realtek RTL8201 PHY transceiver found at address 1.
eth0: Using transceiver found at address 1 as default
eth0: SiS 900 PCI Fast Ethernet at 0xd400, IRQ 11, 00:07:95:cb:59:00.
In den Kernel habe ich den SiS
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 19:20:09 +0200, Hugo Wau wrote:
Eine der Antworten besagt, dass das Prob behoben wurde, indem IO-APIC
Support im Kernel disabeled wurde und danach soll die Ethernet
Schnittstelle gefunzt haben.
Wenn das das Problem ist, hat das ganze wirklich nichts mit DNS zu tun.
Um die
Hugo Wau schrieb/wrote:
sorry, dass die Antwort etwas gedauert hat - ich musste zwischendurch
zum Tierarzt.
Mit Deinem Wau Wau?
schenkelklopf
Sorry, aber den konnte ich mir echt nicht verkneifen...;-)
Gruss,
Christian
(der hiermit seinen Nachnamen Schmidt fuer Hugo zum Abschuss
freigibt -
Am Mon, 2003-09-01 um 21.27 schrieb Christian Schmidt:
Hugo Wau schrieb/wrote:
sorry, dass die Antwort etwas gedauert hat - ich musste zwischendurch
zum Tierarzt.
Um Missverstaenisse zu beseitigen - mit meiner Freundin
ihrem Hund, der Links gelahmt hat.
--
Hugo Wau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hi everybody.
My father has a Win XP box with a builtin DSL card (no linux driver
available AFAIK, it's a Eicon Diva DSL). So the only possibility to get
my Linux laptop connected to the net when I am at home is to let XP dial
in and share the connection to my Linux box. I have tried the
...
the net with their IP adress, but I can not get the name resolution to
work. I don't know which DNS server Windows uses, it is assigned
dynamically wehn the connection is established, and I don't know how to
get the adress...
Any idea how to make surfing the net possible with such a
On Monday 01 September 2003 8:47 am, Jörg Johannes wrote:
My father has a Win XP box with a builtin DSL card (no linux driver
available AFAIK, it's a Eicon Diva DSL). So the only possibility to get
my Linux laptop connected to the net when I am at home is to let XP dial
in and share the
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 17:47, Jörg Johannes wrote:
Hi everybody.
My father has a Win XP box with a builtin DSL card (no linux driver
available AFAIK, it's a Eicon Diva DSL). So the only possibility to get
my Linux laptop connected to the net when I am at home is to let XP dial
in and
status=2 (SOCKET)
Das klingt für mich nach einem DNS Problem... DNS ist ein bind9, der
schlicht als forwarder eingestellt ist (und zusätzlich ein paar kleinere
DNS bereithält):
forwarders {
194.25.2.129;
194.25.0.125;
217.5.112.21;
}
Weiß jemand zufällig was der von mir
Hallo,
Das klingt für mich nach einem DNS Problem... DNS ist ein bind9, der
schlicht als forwarder eingestellt ist (und zusätzlich ein paar kleinere
DNS bereithält):
forwarders {
194.25.2.129;
194.25.0.125;
217.5.112.21;
}
Weiß jemand zufällig was der von mir will? Bisher
Basic troubleshooting steps:
1. Use traceroute or tcptracroute to a known IP address. Make sure
your internet connection is really alive. If not, you have other
problems...
2. Make sure your nameservers are where you think they are. Try
doing:
host www.debian.org nameserver-ip
3.
Hello,
I've tried configuring my dialup accounts using pppconfig, however
when I try to fetch a web page Mozilla sits there forever 'resolving
host foo.bar.com...' When I try to use ping, it also just sits there
trying to resolve the host.
The same happens when I try to configure wvdial. Both
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:09:27PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
* Thomas H. George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030609 13:34]:
I have installed ipmasq as a firewall on a debian computer (Woody,
kernel 2.4.18) placed between a DSL modem and a wireless router. The
system works perfectly with the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:06:19AM -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:09:27PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
* Thomas H. George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030609 13:34]:
I have installed ipmasq as a firewall on a debian computer (Woody,
kernel 2.4.18) placed between a DSL
I have installed ipmasq as a firewall on a debian computer (Woody,
kernel 2.4.18) placed between a DSL modem and a wireless router. The
system works perfectly with the computers on the LAN using Woody or
Testing but I have been unable to use Netscape from a computer using
Windows ME. I can
* Thomas H. George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030609 13:34]:
I have installed ipmasq as a firewall on a debian computer (Woody,
kernel 2.4.18) placed between a DSL modem and a wireless router. The
system works perfectly with the computers on the LAN using Woody or
Testing but I have been unable
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo