Re: Debian + exim + procmail

2001-04-03 Thread garyjones
Am Mon, 02 April 2001 schrieb Noah L. Meyerhans: On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:09:14PM +0200, Gary Jones wrote: My .forward file is: |exec /usr/bin/procmail delete that, and all will be well Thanks, I will try that. I've also been told that in standard configuration exim

Re: Debian + exim + procmail

2001-04-03 Thread Rob Mahurin
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:09:14PM +0200, Gary Jones wrote: Okay, exim has confused me again. I've just set up procmail, per that app's documentation. Now exim says 2001-04-02 22:13:59 14kAi7-5E-01 ** |exec /usr/bin/procmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] D=userforward T=address_pipe: exec command

Re: Debian + exim + procmail

2001-04-03 Thread Steven E. Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've also been told that in standard configuration exim doesn't even need the .forward, that just seeing a .procmailrc will provoke it into invoking procmail. That's right. Here's a snippet from a typical Debian exim configuration file: ,[ /etc/exim.conf

Debian + exim + procmail

2001-04-02 Thread Gary Jones
Okay, exim has confused me again. I've just set up procmail, per that app's documentation. Now exim says 2001-04-02 22:13:59 14kAi7-5E-01 ** |exec /usr/bin/procmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] D=userforward T=address_pipe: exec command not found for address_pipe transport in the log. Iassume the D=

Re: Debian + exim + procmail

2001-04-02 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:09:14PM +0200, Gary Jones wrote: in the log. Iassume the D= T= refer to Director and Transport entries in exim.conf? My .forward file is: |exec /usr/bin/procmail delete that, and all will be well noah --