hadi motamedi:
>
> Can you please do me favor and let me know how can I add a command to my
> Debian server ? Please be informed that I found on the web that if I can
> find the new command rpm package , then I can try to add it as the
> followings :
> #rpm -i ./package.i38
hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
Can you please do me favor and let me know how can I add a command to
my Debian server ? Please be informed that I found on the web that if
I can find the new command rpm package , then I can try to add it as
the followings :
#rpm -i ./package.i386.rpm
It seems
hadi motamedi wrote:
> ...
> please let me have the link to try for adding a command (like dmidecode)
> to my Debian server ?
> Let me thank you in advance
sudo aptitude install dmidecode
If aptitude is not installed, try apt-get instead.
For future needs, try apt-cache search yo
Dear All
Can you please do me favor and let me know how can I add a command to my
Debian server ? Please be informed that I found on the web that if I can
find the new command rpm package , then I can try to add it as the
followings :
#rpm -i ./package.i386.rpm
It seems that the link at
Am Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:52:13 +0200
schrieb Jesus arteche :
> hey,
>
> I have a Mono aplication running in a ubuntu desktop with
> Monodevelop, I want to make it run in a Debian server just with a
> console without X, I got an error i think is because i lack a
> librarry or
hey,
I have a Mono aplication running in a ubuntu desktop with Monodevelop, I
want to make it run in a Debian server just with a console without X, I got
an error i think is because i lack a librarry or something that has
Monodevelop and mono doesn have...some one can help me?
thanks
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:19:07AM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> For security reasons, /tmp, /home, /var/tmp, and anywhere else a normal user
> can create new files should be a separate mount point
I agree. It's good practice to have at least /var and /tmp on seperate
partitions. Much ea
In , Mark
Phillips wrote:
>I am setting up a new server for Plone/Zope sites on a Linode VPS. Reading
>the "Securing Debian Manual" (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-
>debian-howto/), it recommends separate partitions for /tmp, /home, /opt, and
>/var. I was talking with some of the Linod
I am setting up a new server for Plone/Zope sites on a Linode VPS. Reading
the "Securing Debian Manual" (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-
debian-howto/), it recommends separate partitions for /tmp, /home, /opt, and
/var. I was talking with some of the Linode folks on IRC to find out how
Problem solved. I had to install xbase-clients on my vps (debian etch).
__
This email is a Public Email sent by paulalt
Your replies will appear at
http://n2.nabble.com/Setting-up-a-Debian-server-as-a-client-for-X11-tp1680860p1682621.html
Public Email is
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 09:03:33PM -0800, paulalt (via Nabble) wrote:
>
>
>
> I'd like to set up Debian (etch) --my VPS (no GUI)-- as a client for X11. My
> server is X-Win32 on Vista.
>
> X-Win32 configuration gives me an error when I try to connect:
> starnetssh> 809 SSH2 key exchange comple
our replies will appear at
http://n2.nabble.com/Setting-up-a-Debian-server-as-a-client-for-X11-tp1680860p1680860.html
To subscribe to this discussion, click
http://n2.nabble.com/subscriptions/Subscribe.jtp?code=ZGViaWFuLXVzZXJAbGlzdHMuZGViaWFuLm9yZ3wxNjgwODYwfDEwNzg5MTgxMzk=
Public Email is a Nabble idea.
Michael Iatrou wrote:
Depending on the configurability you want, a couple of custom made PHP
scripts that manipulate config files could be enough for a minimal,
lightweight web-based configuration tool.
So far, that sounds about right. Monowall is FreeBSD based, but I assume
I could dow
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 06:26:20AM -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Wed December 3 2008, Michael Iatrou wrote:
> > Depending on the configurability you want, a couple of custom made PHP
> > scripts that manipulate config files could be enough for a minimal,
> > lightweight web-based configuration
On Wed December 3 2008, Michael Iatrou wrote:
> Depending on the configurability you want, a couple of custom made PHP
> scripts that manipulate config files could be enough for a minimal,
> lightweight web-based configuration tool.
>
> --
what about webmin??
http://www.webmin.com/
--
Paul Cart
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm asking the list 'cause I don't know what exactly to Google for, so...
>
> Are there any tools that let one build a custom web based (GUI?) page that
> would let users control and configure a small Debian based server?
>
When the date was Thursday 04 December 2008, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> I'm asking the list 'cause I don't know what exactly to Google for, so...
>
> Are there any tools that let one build a custom web based (GUI?) page
> that would let users control and configure a small Debian based server?
>
> I'm l
I'm asking the list 'cause I don't know what exactly to Google for, so...
Are there any tools that let one build a custom web based (GUI?) page
that would let users control and configure a small Debian based server?
I'm looking to put something together that would let a non-techie user
config
Hi Folks,
I am seeing some extremely strange behavior between my front end webserver
(Sun Java Web Server V7.0U1) on Solaris 10 and a JBoss Server (JBoss 4.2.2)
on a Debian box). Every once in a while, the web server will have a
connection time out with the jboss server (which is part of a 3 mach
Hi!
> He's talking out of his bottom.
>
> I also walk the Dark Path, and I administer a Small Business Server 2003,
> based on Windows Server 2003. It has an Etch server, two routers and a
> printer in the forward lookup zone of the local domain, absolutely none of
> which are domain members, b
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:37:23PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> Mirco Piccin wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
environment.
Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
They are configured with a static ip ad
Mirco Piccin wrote:
Hi all.
I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
environment.
Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
They are configured with a static ip address and have samba installed and
working.
Is there some problem with ad
Hi all!
> I too ran into that issue with the 2k3 DNS server I use. For me, I just
> set up the nsupdate command within a cron job to run weekly. The forced
> update resets the time counter on our 2k3 DNS server. I do not know if
> it is the same on yours.
>
> I read the man pages again and did
>I am not the Windows Administrator. So i call the man who administer
>the DNS and DHCP server.
>He tell me that the Windows 2003 DNS service does not allow dns entry
>update if the machine is not registered in Active Directory.
>
>Of course those Debian machine are NOT registered in AD.
>So, the w
Hi all.
> > I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
> > environment.
> > Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
> > They are configured with a static ip address and have samba installed and
> > working.
> Is there some problem with addin
>To be honest, I am not sure why that did not work. To be sure I typed
>out everything to you correctly, I just added a Debian Lenny machine to
>the Windows 2k3 DNS server at my work with the same (cut and paste)
>directions. It worked right off the bat.
>
>I am 100% certain that this is the utilit
Mirco Piccin wrote:
Hi all.
I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
environment.
Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
They are configured with a static ip address and have samba installed and
working.
Any tips?
Is there some problem
Hi all!
On 6/25/08, Stackpole, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris understand well my situation.
> So i try his suggest:
> # apt-get install dnsutils
> # touch /etc/nsupdate.conf
>
> edit that file in this way:
>
> update delete HostName.DomainName.com. A
> update add HostName.DomainNam
Chris understand well my situation.
So i try his suggest:
# apt-get install dnsutils
# touch /etc/nsupdate.conf
edit that file in this way:
update delete HostName.DomainName.com. A
update add HostName.DomainName.com. 86400 A 192.168.1.1
show
send
quit
(where HostName.DomainName.com is my Debian
in around with out threat of physical harm. Everybody is happy.
Maybe i miss an important information (or not? ...it's in subject).
There's a Win 2003 DNS Server.
My problem is that all the clients can ping them self using hostname,
and they can ping all other windows server in the same way, b
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 09:59:33 am Ron Johnson wrote:
Snip
> >
> > Yes, i know, if i modify hosts file both in linux and in windows machine
> > i will not have more problems to ping those 2 new Debian servers.
> > But there are a lot of people (and computer) that use services running
> > on tho
Hi all.
I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
environment.
Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
They are configured with a static ip address and have samba installed
and working.
Any tips?
Thanks!
Regards
M
Hello,
I believe you are
Hi Mirco,
Unless I am mistaken, if you don't have a DNS Server then winbind
should do the trick.
-Elijah
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Mirco Piccin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
> I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
> environment.
> Servers work like a cha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/25/08 08:51, Mirco Piccin wrote:
> Hi!
>> Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
>
> Thanks Bob:
>> You may need to add relevant entries to the hosts file in each windows
> machine
>
> ...and Damon for yours repl
Hi!
> Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
Thanks Bob:
> You may need to add relevant entries to the hosts file in each windows
machine
...and Damon for yours replies
> If you put those entries into another hosts hosts file, then you can ping
this
> host from tha
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 09:14:42 am Mirco Piccin wrote:
> Hi all.
> I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
> environment.
> Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
> They are configured with a static ip address and have samba installed an
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 15:14:42 +0200, Mirco Piccin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all.
> I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
> environment.
> Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
> They are configured with a static ip address and
Hi all.
I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
environment.
Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
They are configured with a static ip address and have samba installed and
working.
Any tips?
Thanks!
Regards
M
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:01:27AM +0200, Eugen Wintersberger wrote:
[snip]
> if a network printer is activated by default (otherwise I get this
> message after activating a network printer via mouse click).
> When I try now to print the document the access_log on the Ubuntu client
> gets the foll
Hi there
I have a problem with printing from my Ubuntu (8.04) workstations on
network printers exported by a CUPS server running under Debian Etch.
On the Debian server the CUPS version is 1.2.7 while on the Ubuntu boxes
CUPS version is 1.3.7.
To be a bit more precise: printing with lp works
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:10:07PM +0800, paragasu wrote:
> > There is a lot more than just the I/O scheduler. It just popped into my
> > head because I am doing the configuration right now, myself, and because
> > of the debate/controversy about it. Also, you will want to build the
> > device dr
Mark Allums wrote:
paragasu wrote:
i will love to find out all the option available. I just one to ask
one more thing. i hope it
is not too much. Isn't the kernel have modular support. able to load
and unload the
needed and unneeded modules on the fly?
How much is the improvement compare to t
paragasu wrote:
i will love to find out all the option available. I just one to ask one
more thing. i hope it
is not too much. Isn't the kernel have modular support. able to load and
unload the
needed and unneeded modules on the fly?
How much is the improvement compare to the strip down versio
> There is a lot more than just the I/O scheduler. It just popped into my
> head because I am doing the configuration right now, myself, and because
> of the debate/controversy about it. Also, you will want to build the
> device drivers you need as modules, and configure the system to unload
> mo
paragasu wrote:
thanks Mark Allums,
Honestly, i spent less time looking on the kernel side. i will look at
the documentation
for the I/O scheduler options. great information you have ;)
Ron Johnson gets the credit. The idea is, you are low on RAM, so
prevent anything from using RAM. If you
paragasu wrote:
There are three I/O schedulers in the 2.6.24 distribution. The
deadline, anticipatory, and completely fair. You will see these as
options when you run make gconfig (or whichever config you run).
Completely Fair (CFQ) is now the default. This was mildly controve
> There are three I/O schedulers in the 2.6.24 distribution. The
> deadline, anticipatory, and completely fair. You will see these as
> options when you run make gconfig (or whichever config you run).
> Completely Fair (CFQ) is now the default. This was mildly controversial
> when they made the
paragasu wrote:
BSD 7.0 is alleged to be better than Linux 2.6.xx, but that is disputed.
You might want to use a different scheduler and I/O scheduler than the
default if you use a 2.6.24 kernel. As the man said, compile your own.
well, add RAM is out of question, because it is a
> BSD 7.0 is alleged to be better than Linux 2.6.xx, but that is disputed.
> You might want to use a different scheduler and I/O scheduler than the
> default if you use a 2.6.24 kernel. As the man said, compile your own.
>
> I can't answer as well about the userlands. That depends on what
> envi
On 03/30/08 19:54, paragasu wrote:
I find on my boxes with 64 MB ram or less, that I hit swap
often. Etch
is like that. So for old boxes, I run OpenBSD. No re-compiling
necessary.
Doug.
are u suggesting that OpenBSD use better resource than debian etch?
"Better"? Not if y
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 01:17:59 +0800
paragasu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have a small vps with only 64MB memory. i am trying to run a costume
> made PHP
> scripts in there but i have trouble. when i install mysql server 5.0
> and apache2 server.
> it is so slow. in fact too slow. thus two server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/08 19:54, paragasu wrote:
>
> I find on my boxes with 64 MB ram or less, that I hit swap often. Etch
> is like that. So for old boxes, I run OpenBSD. No re-compiling
> necessary.
>
> Doug.
>
>
>
> are u suggesting that
> I find on my boxes with 64 MB ram or less, that I hit swap often. Etch
> is like that. So for old boxes, I run OpenBSD. No re-compiling
> necessary.
>
> Doug.
>
are u suggesting that OpenBSD use better resource than debian etch?
is there any way to customize debian etch so it use server reso
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:17:59AM +0800, paragasu wrote:
> i have a small vps with only 64MB memory. i am trying to run a costume made
> PHP
> well, assume i don't have enough money to buy a better server. it is
> possible to make a
> very fast server with compiling the source code etc..
>
> th
i have a small vps with only 64MB memory. i am trying to run a costume made
PHP
scripts in there but i have trouble. when i install mysql server 5.0 and
apache2 server.
it is so slow. in fact too slow. thus two server already use about 170MB of
the server ram.
more than twice the RAM allocated for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/08 11:59, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
> Nuno,
>
> nm> Try the rest of the world, ...
>
> oregonstate.edu is the closest server which
> has the files. Going to another server will
> only increase the cost of communication.
>
> Regards,
Nuno,
nm> Try the rest of the world, ...
oregonstate.edu is the closest server which
has the files. Going to another server will
only increase the cost of communication.
Regards, ... Peter E.
http://carnot.yi.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Jan 7, 2008 3:49 AM, rudolf vavra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to buy server Intel x3400, Xeon Quad Core E5320 with Express 250GB
> SATA HDD. At home I use Debian 4.0. Please, can I use this server with
> Debian 4.0 or 3.1, if there are problems with drivers etc.
> I want to use Debian
Hi there,
I want to buy server Intel x3400, Xeon Quad Core E5320 with Express 250GB
SATA HDD. At home I use Debian 4.0. Please, can I use this server with
Debian 4.0 or 3.1, if there are problems with drivers etc.
I want to use Debian with Ruby, MySQL, PHP, Lighttpd, Apache. Can U give me
any help
David Labens:
> I'm interested in the Debian Linux software for use in
> building a home file server. I'll need it to provide
> print server function
CUPS.
> as well as file backup
Several options, depending on your needs.
> and UPS shutdown support.
Depends on UPS in use. Many are supported
I'm interested in the Debian Linux software for use in
building a home file server. I'll need it to provide
print server function as well as file backup and UPS
shutdown support. Also, I want clients on my Win'XP
Professional desktops so that they can login to the
server. Separate and common fil
Thanks all for the help!
--
http://www.xing.com/profile/Dmitri_Pissarenko
http://dapissarenko.blogspot.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 11:11:39PM +0200, Dmitri Pissarenko wrote:
>
> I tried now to connect to the Debian machine via FTP but this doesn't work.
>
Can both boxes connect to other boxes on the net? Are the cables good
and do you get connection lights on the NICs?
Can you connect or get a resp
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 11:11:39PM +0200, Dmitri Pissarenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I tried now to connect to the Debian machine via FTP but this doesn't work.
>
> In FileZilla (on Windows machine), I'm getting following error:
>
> Status: Connecting to 169.254.216.106 ...
> Status: Conn
Hello!
I tried now to connect to the Debian machine via FTP but this doesn't work.
In FileZilla (on Windows machine), I'm getting following error:
Status: Connecting to 169.254.216.106 ...
Status: Connected with 169.254.216.106. Waiting for welcome message...
Error: Disconnected from server
Er
Dmitri Pissarenko ha scritto:
>
> How can I set the IP address of the Debian machine?
>
> I tried to do this:
>
> /sbin/ifconfig eth0 192.109.42.23 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
^^
and the win machine
Hello!
> /sbin/ifconfig eth0 192.109.42.23 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
^^
and the win machine must be on the same net 192.109.42.xxx
Thanks for the hint!
Now it seems to work.
Best regards
Dmitri Pissarenko
--
http://www.xing.com/profile/Dmitri_Pissarenko
http://dapissarenko.blogspot.com/
And if you want to know if the webserver is running, try `ps aux | grep
apache'. This should give you an instance of apache. With nmap you can
also check if something is listening on port 80.
Good luck!
Sjoerd
Aenn Seidhe Priest wrote:
> http://[server ip] in a browser.
>
> A piece of advice is
http://[server ip] in a browser.
A piece of advice is to apt-get Midnight Commander (mc) and an SSH server,
then the server would be administrable remotely via SSH with a decent
text-mode filemanager that can run over SSH without any trouble. Midnight
Commander is an essential utility.
Most confi
Hello!
I'm totally new to Debian and have following question:
I've installed Debian on a machine, which is connected via a LAN cable
to a windows machine.
On Debian a web server should run. I say "should" because I can't tell
whether it actually runs - this is a pure server installation.
What
Am 2006-06-27 15:16:50, schrieb Johannes Wiedersich:
> My _personal_ recommendation is not to use a hardware-raid (depending on
> your data-security considerations). Our hardware-raid-5 controller
> recently died just a few weeks before guarantee expired. Had it survived
> some more weeks, it w
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:10:45 + (GMT)
ZeroUno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
> file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
> "standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
> Now we're investigating the
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:00:27AM +, ZeroUno wrote:
> Kevin Mark ha scritto:
> That's why I'm here.
> Being sure about this, based only on vendor and official web site
> informations, is not possible. They simply tell you that they are sure
> their stuff works fine with RH etc., and that t
Thanks, this brings some relief.
The problem is that, when searching for info about a server machine
offered by the reseller, I'm a bit scared to find out that only binary
downloads for a restricted range of operating systems are available...
this happened with an IBM machine, and now I'm look
Kevin Mark ha scritto:
more modern CPU (maybe a dual cpu) and such. If you are not monitoring
your useage, it would be a good way to determine if you need a new
machine.
The current server actually satisfies our current needs, it's not
overloaded. But we are in one of those times when the com
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:10:45PM +, ZeroUno wrote:
> Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
> file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
> "standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
> Now we're investigating the possibility to upgr
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:10 +, ZeroUno wrote:
> Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
> file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
> "standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
> Now we're investigating the possibility to upgrade it,
ZeroUno wrote:
Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
"standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
Now we're investigating the possibility to upgrade it, and we also want
to consider REAL server
ZeroUno wrote:
The problem is that, when searching for info about a server machine
offered by the reseller, I'm a bit scared to find out that only binary
downloads for a restricted range of operating systems are available...
this happened with an IBM machine, and now I'm looking for an Intel
s
Goran wrote:
Hello, my personal view is that all this stuff ("someOS-compatible") is
crap. Just look for good & qualitative parts for the server and that's
it.
Thanks, this brings some relief.
The problem is that, when searching for info about a server machine
offered by the reseller, I'm a b
Goran wrote:
Hello, my personal view is that all this stuff ("someOS-compatible") is
crap. Just look for good & qualitative parts for the server and that's
it.
My actual recommendation for server with several responsibilities in
small companies is an Vanerpool enabled Intel-machine for using with
Hello, my personal view is that all this stuff ("someOS-compatible") is
crap. Just look for good & qualitative parts for the server and that's
it.
My actual recommendation for server with several responsibilities in
small companies is an Vanerpool enabled Intel-machine for using with
Xen, some gigs
Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
"standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
Now we're investigating the possibility to upgrade it, and we also want
to consider REAL servers, but... judgin
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:42:20PM -0500, Pabla,Balbir [Ontario] wrote:
>
> I am in process of setting up Dell 2800 server with Debian 3.1, 2.4 smp
> kernel.
> I can ping/telnet/ftp out, but from other machine I cannot connect to
> to this server using ping, telnet/ftp.
> Any body can help, how t
Title: Cannot connect to Debian Server over network
I am in process of setting up Dell 2800 server with Debian 3.1, 2.4 smp kernel.
I can ping/telnet/ftp out, but from other machine I cannot connect to to this server using ping, telnet/ftp.
Any body can help, how these services are set
Incase you want a simpler solution which could work on both Linux and
Windows, use unison.
rrs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TAC Forums wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a Debian server running ssh which performs the job of a Backup Server.
>
> All the GNU/Linux workstations / servers on the network have a bash
> script that run in the cron to rsync the data folders to the main
> backup server at night.
>
TAC Forums wrote:
Hi
I have a Debian server running ssh which performs the job of a Backup Server.
All the GNU/Linux workstations / servers on the network have a bash
script that run in the cron to rsync the data folders to the main
backup server at night.
However, I am having difficulting
Hi
I have a Debian server running ssh which performs the job of a Backup Server.
All the GNU/Linux workstations / servers on the network have a bash
script that run in the cron to rsync the data folders to the main
backup server at night.
However, I am having difficulting finding an rsync
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Britton Kerin wrote:
Im surprised that unison would die on long file names. The unison
people
say they still bug fix support unison, have you reported the problems to
them?
They know about the problem, it has been there forever. It seems to be
connected to the Windows API
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Justin Guerin wrote:
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 18:00, Debian Users wrote:
I have read about tunneling the SMB traffic through an ssh tunnel, but
that would also mean turning off the usual network browsing of the remote
Windows box, which is cumbersome at least.
No, it
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 02:00:44 +0100, "Debian Users"
said:
> Now for the interesting thing: our network does not allow SMB access from
> outside (its the universiy's policy, I cannot change that): SMB ports are
> blocked. I still would like to synchronize the data on e.g. my laptop and
> the file
cal replica or the actual
> network files. The user doesn't notice the difference. After reconnecting
> to the server, the files are synchronized automatically using built-in XP
> software. Actually, this works fantastically stable (thumbs up for MS in
> this case). The network version of
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Dick Davies wrote:
Does windows have rsync?
You need:
* ssh access to the remote box
* an rsync binary (not a server) on the remote and local hosts
* enough privilege on the remote host to see the files you want
Thank you for your suggestion, but rsync will not do the tric
> network files. The user doesn't notice the difference. After reconnecting
> to the server, the files are synchronized automatically using built-in XP
> software. Actually, this works fantastically stable (thumbs up for MS in
> this case). The network version of the files are living o
fference. After reconnecting
to the server, the files are synchronized automatically using built-in XP
software. Actually, this works fantastically stable (thumbs up for MS in
this case). The network version of the files are living on a Debian
server, accessed from several XP machines via SMB shares
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Toshiro wrote:
>
>>Anyone knows any hosting company who has Debian dedicated servers to rent?
>
>
> I'm guessing the list archives do since this comes up about once every 2
> weeks. My recommendation is in there.
>
mine too!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
> Anyone knows any hosting company who has Debian dedicated
> servers to rent?
Yes - TekTonic
http://www.tektonic.net/dedicated.php
Regards,
MB
Toshiro wrote:
> Anyone knows any hosting company who has Debian dedicated servers to rent?
I'm guessing the list archives do since this comes up about once every 2
weeks. My recommendation is in there.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PG
Hi!
Anyone knows any hosting company who has Debian dedicated servers to rent?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
201 - 300 of 439 matches
Mail list logo
