Am 2006-12-12 23:38:35, schrieb Justin Hartman:
Forgive me if I am posting this to the wrong list but I am not sure
where this kind of a email would be posted to. That said, I am
interested to find out people's perspective on running Debian stable
as a web server in a production environment
Am 2006-12-13 09:28:52, schrieb Ken Hu:
Our company choose RedHat(before) and CentOS(now) as our main web server
just because the availability of the hardware drivers.
Usually we use IBM's PC servers with hardware raid and we can only get
the driver of the raid controller card for RHEL .
I
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:39:32PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Updating of RedHat/Fedora machines are the HELL.
This is WHY I am dedicated Debian GNU/Linux Consultant.
Actually, if you are fortunate enough to have a homogeneous environment
(or mostly so), Red Hat can be handled very well
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:43:53AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
I guess you missed my point.
The point is, the setup for the webserver stuff and the modules to be
loaded by it... and the bind configuration and the configurations it
uses. The split config setups in Exim and Apache and Bind
Forgive me if I am posting this to the wrong list but I am not sure
where this kind of a email would be posted to. That said, I am
interested to find out people's perspective on running Debian stable
as a web server in a production environment.
I have noticed that Red Hat, Suse, CentOS, Fedora
On 12/12/06, Justin Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive me if I am posting this to the wrong list but I am not sure
where this kind of a email would be posted to. That said, I am
interested to find out people's perspective on running Debian stable
as a web server in a production environment
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:38:35 +0200
Justin Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive me if I am posting this to the wrong list but I am not
sure where this kind of a email would be posted to. That said, I
am interested to find out people's perspective on running Debian
stable as a web server
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 23:38 +0200, Justin Hartman wrote:
I have noticed that Red Hat, Suse, CentOS, Fedora, etc. appear to
dominate the web server market as the backend powering most production
servers and I'm wondering why Debian doesn't feature?
I haven't seen any numbers on this for a
I'm sure you're wrong. Debian was showed as #1 in the web servers that
publishes the distribution info by Netcraft some time ago (nothing
more than 1 or 2 years ago).
I'm sure I am and I was really making this statement based on my own
perception more than any hard facts. I think what may be
Justin Hartman writes:
I own two dedicated web servers and they run Red Hat and CentOS but what
makes them different to Debian?
Marketing.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:03:39 +0200
Justin Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure you're wrong. Debian was showed as #1 in the web servers
that publishes the distribution info by Netcraft some time ago
(nothing more than 1 or 2 years ago).
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 00:03 +0200, Justin Hartman wrote:
I'm sure you're wrong. Debian was showed as #1 in the web servers that
publishes the distribution info by Netcraft some time ago (nothing
more than 1 or 2 years ago).
I'm sure I am and I was really making this statement based on my
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 23:38 +0200, Justin Hartman wrote:
I own two dedicated web servers and they run Red Hat and CentOS but
what makes them different to Debian? I have done a lot of reading and
research on Debian and my impression of, particularly stable is that
it is one of the most
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:38:35PM +0200, Justin Hartman wrote:
Forgive me if I am posting this to the wrong list but I am not sure
where this kind of a email would be posted to. That said, I am
interested to find out people's perspective on running Debian stable
as a web server
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:03:39AM +0200, Justin Hartman wrote:
Actually, we're working very hard to polish our next release (Etch)
and i suggest you give it a try.
Honestly I really want to give Debian a try as one of my production
servers. I don't know how difficult it will be to migrate
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 06:01:01PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
cPanel and Plesk plus others have support for the stable versions of
Debian (cPanel even still supports Woody, though that is changed
shortly)
There is also webmin, which keeps up quite nicely even with Sid, IIRC.
Etch isn't
Our company choose RedHat(before) and CentOS(now) as our main web server
just because the availability of the hardware drivers.
Usually we use IBM's PC servers with hardware raid and we can only get
the driver of the raid controller card for RHEL .
If anyone can shed some light on me to let me
On 12/12/06, Justin Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure you're wrong. Debian was showed as #1 in the web servers that
publishes the distribution info by Netcraft some time ago (nothing
more than 1 or 2 years ago).
I'm sure I am and I was really making this statement based on my own
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 18:54 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
cPanel and Plesk plus others have support for the stable versions of
Debian (cPanel even still supports Woody, though that is changed
shortly)
There is also webmin, which keeps up quite nicely even with Sid, IIRC.
Webmin is
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:53:37PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 18:54 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
cPanel and Plesk plus others have support for the stable versions of
Debian (cPanel even still supports Woody, though that is changed
shortly)
There is also
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 21:00 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:53:37PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 18:54 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
cPanel and Plesk plus others have support for the stable versions of
Debian (cPanel even still
21 matches
Mail list logo
