Hi,
I too, say it's nothing to do with the distribution, everything to do
with the administrator.
If you get bit by lprng, shame on you. If you get bit by statd,
resign, that one's old. I had 50 machines trojaned with it when the
spoit first came out, but due to good IDS (a a co-worker in the of
<>
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/16168.html
The Register.url
Description: Binary data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> <>
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/16168.html
Anything that runs the vulnerable versions of those programs is
vulnerable, including Debian. The key is to keep up to date with
you might
find something to laugh about.
Brooks
> -Original Message-
> From: Joris Lambrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 4:48 AM
> To: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
> Subject: Debian is safer than this ? I REALLY HOPE SO !
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> WELL, i'm might have been somewhat too eager to spark a discussion ...
> the thing i'm wondering/confused about is that the 'worm' infects only
> redhat systems, according to this article at
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 11:47:55AM +0100, Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> <>
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/16168.html
No, I don't think Debian is any safer. Admins of publicly accesible
machines need to track security updates.
--
Eric G. Miller
erable.
-|
-|anyway, good to know i turned of my machine this morning :)
-|
-|J.L.
-|
-|-Original Message-
-|From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-|Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 4:00 PM
-|To: Joris Lambrecht
-|Cc: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
-|Subject: Re:
erable.
-|
-|anyway, good to know i turned of my machine this morning :)
-|
-|J.L.
-|
-|-Original Message-
-|From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-|Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 4:00 PM
-|To: Joris Lambrecht
-|Cc: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
-|Subject: Re:
Joris Lambrecht wrote:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/16168.html
Describing holes in lprng, wu.ftpd, and rpc.statd.
None of these holes are present in potato with the updates from
security.debian.org.
cheers,
Remco.
'
Subject: Re: Debian is safer than this ? I REALLY HOPE SO !
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> <>
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/16168.html
Anything that runs the vulnerable versions of th
10 matches
Mail list logo