On Sunday 21 March 2004 02:39, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's perfectly possible to
install 2.6 even on the current stable, albeit with a few backports
of
things like module-init-tools and e2fsprogs
I am too much of a newbie to attempt such a thing. I was
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 09:39:30PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's perfectly possible to
install 2.6 even on the current stable, albeit with a few backports
of
things like module-init-tools and e2fsprogs
I am too much of a newbie to attempt such a thing.
Alan Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My reccomendation is to download the kernel-source-* package
that corresponds to the kernel you run now. Use the configuration
for your currently running kernel (since you know it works).
After going through the process a few times, you will begin to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Currently it's still microsoft, mainly because of games,
Non-issue. http://www.transgaming.com/ I'm a *serious* Vice City
junkie, and I don't have any consoles and I don't do Windows.
but I am sure this will change sometime in the future when Linux
gets a little
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 01:21:13AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the replies. More insight is very welcome, so keep them
coming.
So far what I think I am going to do is wait for SuSE 9.1 and the new
release of Debian (which I presume will both use the 2.6 Kernel) and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's perfectly possible to
install 2.6 even on the current stable, albeit with a few backports
of
things like module-init-tools and e2fsprogs
I am too much of a newbie to attempt such a thing. I was raised on
BASIC, on the Timex-Sinclair, C64, TI-994A, then moved to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 11:46:08PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
Better than any other OS on the market. You might have to work for
parts of it, but jeeze, what other distribution of anything supports
13
No good reason why, but I am considering switching from SuSE 8.2 to
Debian.
Knowledge and skill-wise, I probably am still in the newbie
category, but I can do a heck of a lot more than I could at first.
Some questions for those of you who use Debian:
1. In the newest version, how good is the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No good reason why, but I am considering switching from SuSE 8.2 to
Debian.
Knowledge and skill-wise, I probably am still in the newbie
category, but I can do a heck of a lot more than I could at first.
Some questions for those of you who use Debian:
1. In the newest
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 05:02:06PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems with SuSE and redhat (which I played with for a week or two),
my major issues are ALWAYS hardware. Which I doubt is earth
shattering.
2. Boot loader -- I am pretty sure I read on their website
On 2004-03-19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] penned:
[snip]
But what about LCD support (how easily can I adjust refresh rate etc.?
I am not afraid to do it by hand, as long as it will let me).
I googled on my LCD monitor's model and found that someone had posted
some helpful modelines. I used those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. In the newest version, how good is the hardware support?
Better than any other OS on the market. You might have to work for
parts of it, but jeeze, what other distribution of anything supports
13 architectures? How
12 matches
Mail list logo
