Petro, 2002-Jun-05 18:30 -0700:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:56:43PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Them and everyone else it seems. I gotta wonder if anybody from
> > California ever stopped to think that they're turning Oregon into what
> > they moved away from...
>
> If they stopped to thi
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:56:43PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Them and everyone else it seems. I gotta wonder if anybody from
> California ever stopped to think that they're turning Oregon into what
> they moved away from...
If they stopped to think, they wouldn't be the Californians that
Paul Johnson, 2002-May-31 23:56 -0700:
>
> Them and everyone else it seems. I gotta wonder if anybody from
> California ever stopped to think that they're turning Oregon into what
> they moved away from...
>
> --
> Baloo
>
No doubt! I'm a native Californian looking forward to the day I can
l
Paul Johnson, 2002-May-31 22:52 -0700:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:35:07PM -0700, Jeff wrote:
>
> > > ...caught 23 roughly 14" long brook trout last Monday while everone
> > > else was at work...
> >
> > you bastard :-)
>
> Not really. The tradeoff is doing 10 hour shifts on Friday and Satur
> "Paul" == Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> About the only good thing I can say about summer is I'm less
Paul> likely to get poked in the eye by some tourist prick that
Paul> doesn't realise it's considered rude to carry an open
Paul> umbrella in a crowd. Get a
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 01:16:21AM -0700, ben wrote:
> californian. i think that, in a previous post, where i used the phrase
> 'dotcom okies,' i should have said dotcom migrants. perhaps i encouraged
> interstate antipathy by that error. the point is that if i have a grievance
No, it was menti
On Saturday 01 June 2002 12:24 am, Shawn Dunn wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2002 23:56:43 -0700
>
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > definitely cute; married to the bass player, in fact. they used to be
> > > our personal house band in sf, before they all, almost as one, realized
> > > they'
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:24:25AM -0700, Shawn Dunn wrote:
> Try out Montana sometime, grew up there, and the Californians and
> Easterners are doing their damnedest to remake in the image of the
> places they left, and have been for round 20 years or so..
Heh, yeah. I just kinda wish th
On Fri, 31 May 2002 23:56:43 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > definitely cute; married to the bass player, in fact. they used to be our
> > personal house band in sf, before they all, almost as one, realized they'd
> > had it with high rent and dotcom okies.
>
> Them and every
On Friday 31 May 2002 11:56 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:39:07PM -0700, ben wrote:
> > all of which goes to explain why you're on the list on a friday night, i
> > guess.
>
> Well, even if I was doing what I want to be, sometimes the local furry
> parties get a little slow f
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:39:07PM -0700, ben wrote:
> all of which goes to explain why you're on the list on a friday night, i
> guess.
Well, even if I was doing what I want to be, sometimes the local furry
parties get a little slow for ten minutes or so as people geek out, so I
retreat back t
On Friday 31 May 2002 10:52 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:35:07PM -0700, Jeff wrote:
> > > ...caught 23 roughly 14" long brook trout last Monday while everone
> > > else was at work...
> >
> > you bastard :-)
>
> Not really. The tradeoff is doing 10 hour shifts on Friday a
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:35:07PM -0700, Jeff wrote:
> > ...caught 23 roughly 14" long brook trout last Monday while everone
> > else was at work...
>
> you bastard :-)
Not really. The tradeoff is doing 10 hour shifts on Friday and Saturday
night. Portland has lots of clubs, but none of the
Paul Johnson, 2002-May-31 20
> ...caught 23 roughly 14" long brook trout last Monday while everone
> else was at work...
you bastard :-)
--
Jeff CoppockSystems Engineer
Diggin' Debian Admin and User
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 10:41:37AM -0700, Walter Reed wrote:
> Um, speak for yourself. Grilling is a year-round thing for some up us
> Minnesotan's! Neither rain nor sleet nor snow shall keep us from our appointed
> burger filpping... :-)
Same here with Oregonians. Who needs a patio cover? Grab
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:52:42AM -0700, ben wrote:
> yup. mono-linuxism. debian is the standard. unitedlinux is a business
> venture, that's all. it's like comparing shaolin monks to tele-evangelists.
Don't get me started on that Pat Robertson thief...trying to cheat the
Red Cross out of money.
On Friday 31 May 2002 02:52 pm, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 31 May 2002 12:59 pm, ben wrote:
> > On Friday 31 May 2002 12:29 pm, Quenten Griffith wrote:
> > > And what exactly is LSB?
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > > http://people.debian.or
On Fri, 31 May 2002 14:18:44 -0700
>
>it was a mild rebuke. things can get quite heated on
> this list sometimes. on behalf of people like me, don't let it put
> you off.
Yeah I felt like I was taken to the woodshed once or twice this
week, but I was not put off by it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 31 May 2002 12:59 pm, ben wrote:
> On Friday 31 May 2002 12:29 pm, Quenten Griffith wrote:
> > And what exactly is LSB?
>
> [snip]
>
> > > > http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
> > > > http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/
>
> you see t
To true, I was misspoken I should not of said "people" like you because it was
unfair of me to judge someone just by one post for that I apologize.
ben wrote:
> On Friday 31 May 2002 01:23 pm, Quenten Griffith wrote:
> > You know Ben its people like you that make posting anything to newsgroups
>
On Friday 31 May 2002 01:23 pm, Quenten Griffith wrote:
> You know Ben its people like you that make posting anything to newsgroups
> unenjoyable. I did go to those links and they don't really give a great
> description exactly what it is. Did someone wake up on the wrong side of
> the bed or are
Google is so amazing I hardly need to post to lists anymore. Sometimes I
try it before looking at man pages. ;-) Entering "lsb" gives this as the
first hit:
Linux Standard Base
Latest Happenings, About the LSB. Specification Proposals The latest draft of
various specification proposals are now list
You know Ben its people like you that make posting anything to newsgroups
unenjoyable. I did go to those links and they don't really give a great
description exactly what it is. Did someone wake up on the wrong side of the
bed
or are you always just completely rude to other people?
ben wrote:
On Friday 31 May 2002 12:29 pm, Quenten Griffith wrote:
> And what exactly is LSB?
>
[snip]
> > >
> > > http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
> > > http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/
> >
you see those linky type things? they're actually addresses you can go to on
the web. you know what the
On 31-May-2002 Quenten Griffith wrote:
> And what exactly is LSB?
>
Linux Standards Base. It is defining what a linux distribution has to have.
see http://www.linuxbase.org.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And what exactly is LSB?
Grant Bowman wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 10:15]:
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or
> > > roadway to conformance with the LSB?
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
> > http://people.debian
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 11:47]:
> Grant Bowman wrote:
> > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 10:15]:
> > > Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or
> > > > roadway to conformance with the LSB?
> > >
> > > http://people.debian.org/~t
Ron Johnson wrote:
> I also see a lot of " not part of debian base install.
> No problem." To my untrained eye, that looks like a dodge
No, it's a recognition of a crummy test suite. The lsb does not itself
mention, eg, /etc/gettydefs -- which cannot be a part of debian since
the gettyps package
Grant Bowman wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 10:15]:
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or
> > > roadway to conformance with the LSB?
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
> > http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/
>
>
I'm sure that it won't make a whole lot of difference, but RedHat asked me to
fill out a survey last week (I used to run all RedHat servers), I answered the
survey and explained that I had converted all my servers (15) to debian because
RPM just does not cut it. I would not expect RedHat to conv
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 10:15]:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or
> > roadway to conformance with the LSB?
>
> http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
> http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/
looked at ~taggart/lsb/ lately? It se
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 12:21:37PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Unfortunately, if I wanted a "hamburger" in Minnesota in February,
> you wouldn't fire up your grill.
Um, speak for yourself. Grilling is a year-round thing for some up us
Minnesotan's! Neither rain nor sleet nor snow shall keep us fro
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 12:07, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or
> > roadway to conformance with the LSB?
>
> http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
> http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/
Thanks. From http://people.debian.org/~
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 11:52, ben wrote:
> On Friday 31 May 2002 09:01 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> > > Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or otherwise?
> >
> > Why should there be? We are already the One True
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or
> roadway to conformance with the LSB?
http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020531 10:01]:
> On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 11:26, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> > Paul Johnson said:
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> > >> Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or
> > >> otherwise?
> > >
> > > Why
On 31-May-2002 ben wrote:
> On Friday 31 May 2002 09:01 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
>> > Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or otherwise?
>>
>> Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distributio
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 11:26, Rick Macdonald wrote:
>
> Paul Johnson said:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> >> Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or
> >> otherwise?
> >
> > Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distribut
On 31-May-2002 Rick Macdonald wrote:
>
> Paul Johnson said:
>> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
>>> Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or
>>> otherwise?
>>
>> Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distribution.
>> 8:o)
>
>
On Friday 31 May 2002 09:01 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> > Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or otherwise?
>
> Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distribution.
> 8:o)
yup. mono-linuxism. de
Paul Johnson said:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
>> Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or
>> otherwise?
>
> Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distribution.
> 8:o)
I wrote to Caldera asking if UnitedLinux is Debian b
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or otherwise?
Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distribution.
8:o)
--
Baloo
pgpLNOmDUr8ri.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or otherwise?
http://computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0%2C10801%2C71535%2C00.html?nlid=AM
...RickM...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
43 matches
Mail list logo
