On 20/9/21 08:34, Will wrote:
> I'm on Debian unstable. Firefox is currently stuck on 88.x. Was there a
> reason unstable wasn't tracking against later releases? The latest
release
> for Firefox is - AFAICT - version 92. Not in a rush to get to
version 92,
> but I've noticed it's lagg
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, at 5:34 PM, Will wrote:
> Ah! I didn't know about that. I'll look at tracker in the future. Of
> course, the next question is: what's the hold up for getting the latest rustc
> into unstable? Guess I'll wait a bit longer. Hope it's not too long.
>
> Cheers,
> -W
Fire
Ah! I didn't know about that. I'll look at tracker in the future. Of
course, the next question is: what's the hold up for getting the latest
rustc into unstable? Guess I'll wait a bit longer. Hope it's not too long.
Cheers,
-W
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 5:21 PM Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> On Sun,
On Sun, Sep 19 2021 at 03:51:17 PM, Will wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm on Debian unstable. Firefox is currently stuck on 88.x. Was there a
> reason unstable wasn't tracking against later releases? The latest release
> for Firefox is - AFAICT - version 92. Not in a rush to get to version 92,
> bu
Greetings,
I'm on Debian unstable. Firefox is currently stuck on 88.x. Was there a
reason unstable wasn't tracking against later releases? The latest release
for Firefox is - AFAICT - version 92. Not in a rush to get to version 92,
but I've noticed it's lagged behind recently. :)
Thanks,
-W
5 matches
Mail list logo
