On Jul 2, 2006, at 3:53 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:46:46AM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
On Jul 1, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Glueck wrote:
Libranet took Debian, added their famed Admin utility, an
inst
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:46:46AM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Robert Glueck wrote:
> >>Libranet took Debian, added their famed Admin utility, an
> >>installer and a bunch of other perks t
On Jul 1, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Glueck wrote:
Libranet took Debian, added their famed Admin utility, an
installer and a bunch of other perks to it and then
marketed it for pay.
[snip]
Were they required t
Robert Glueck wrote:
Libranet took Debian, added their famed Admin utility, an
installer and a bunch of other perks to it and then
marketed it for pay.
And not much pay, at that.
I bought 2 and 2.8.1. when I was just starting out.
If I got stuck, they were always happy to help via email before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Glueck wrote:
> Libranet took Debian, added their famed Admin utility, an
> installer and a bunch of other perks to it and then
> marketed it for pay.
[snip]
> Were they required to do so
> by the GPL?
adminmenu was closed so
Robert Glueck wrote:
> Libranet took Debian, added their famed Admin utility, an
> installer and a bunch of other perks to it and then
> marketed it for pay. Did they ever return their coding
> efforts to the open source community, e.g. by making
> available the source code of their add-ons or giv
Libranet took Debian, added their famed Admin utility, an
installer and a bunch of other perks to it and then
marketed it for pay. Did they ever return their coding
efforts to the open source community, e.g. by making
available the source code of their add-ons or giving back
to the FOSS in any oth
7 matches
Mail list logo
