On 10/13/2008 08:59 PM, H. S. wrote:
[...]
Now, if understand this right, with that rootnoverify stuff in Debian
grub, that entry will lead me to FC9's grub, correct? In that case, I
still don't have the grub.conf in FC9's grub. How do I go about getting
that? grub-install seemed not to work in
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 01:41 -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
On 10/13/2008 08:59 PM, H. S. wrote:
[...]
--deleted--
My Debian system doesn't have a grub.conf but a /boot/grub/menu.lst
instead. I create boot stanzas by modifying menu.lst, but I've heard
that FC users need to edit grub.conf.
Hello,
I just installed Fedora Core 9 alongside Debian. During the installation
I did not update grub and chose not to install grub since I wanted to
retain my Debian grub configuration. I have done this before. I just
change Debian's grub to put in the relevant stanzas for my FC kernel
(was FC8
This solved the problem:
1. Booted in to my Debian system.
2. Did
# grub-install /dev/sda13
where /dev/sda13 is the other distro's partition(in my case it is Fedora
Core 9) which has /boot .
3. Rebooted and selected Fedora's kernel and it worked okay.
Regards
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:38 AM
On 10/13/2008 09:38 AM, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
I just installed Fedora Core 9 alongside Debian. During the installation
I did not update grub and chose not to install grub since I wanted to
retain my Debian grub configuration. I have done this before. I just
change Debian's grub to put in the
H. S. wrote:
This solved the problem:
1. Booted in to my Debian system.
2. Did
# grub-install /dev/sda13
BTW, got that solution from here:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/partial-success-installing-grub-error-2-643342/
Apparently there is something new in the
Mumia W.. wrote:
s.
That allows me two advantages: I can use chain-loading for the secondary
OS's, and each Linux OS has perfect boot stanzas in their respective
/boot/grub/menu.lst files.
Good idea.
I recommend installing Grub under FC9, but install it to the superblock
of
What is the diff between Woody, Sid, and Hurd?
mike...
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:19:14AM -0500, Mike Grover wrote:
What is the diff between Woody, Sid, and Hurd?
Woody is the testing tree. Will become the next stable.
sid wil be unstable the whole life ;)
Hurd is a GNU Kernel. It's just an alternativ to Linux.
Sven
--
Sven Hoexter Earth - Germany
Mike Grover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MG What is the diff between Woody, Sid, and Hurd?
Backing up a little:
POTATO: The current Debian stable release; aside from security
fixes, this will never change
WOODY: The current Debian testing release; will eventually become
stable; updates
Mike Grover wrote:
What is the diff between Woody, Sid, and Hurd?
Woody is (currently) the testing release of the Debian GNU/Linux OS.
After some period of testing, Debian releases the testing version
as stable. Expect Woody to come out some time soon - when, I hope
soon enough (God knows for
Title: RE: Distro's
GNU/Linux is a monolithic kernel while the HURD is based on GNU Mach, the microkernel of the GNU system. The Hurd is a collection of servers that run on the Mach microkernel to implement services. See :
http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd.html
http://www.gnu.org
12 matches
Mail list logo