Mark Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all
Why don't we reorganize TeX for debian as follows: get rid of unneccessary
older TeX packages (which I understand are buggy) and replace them with
teTeX. That is, we use teTeX as the basis for debian TeX stuff. Then we
could value add to teTeX
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Seelig) writes:
Actually i thought that teTeX was supposed to and is the solution for
what you seem to recognize as Debian's confused TeX direction!? IMHO
the fact that teTeX has become part of Debian is a major reason to
consider installing Debian. I suppose that
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Dunham) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Seelig) writes:
consider installing Debian. I suppose that teTeX is at the moment the
state of the art of all the Unix TeX distributions available.
web2c-7.0 is the state of the art.
On 21 Apr 1997, Paul Seelig wrote:
web2c-7.0 is the state of the art.
Which in turn contains lots of improvements by Thomas Esser who does
designe teTeX. The upcoming teTeX release will be based on web2c-7.0
or later. So the development of teTeX and web2c are actually strongly
related to
Paul Seelig writes:
Mark Phillips writes:
I think it is in Debian's interest to think carefully about how to get
the best possible TeX distribution. I think for a lot of people, having
a great TeX distribution would be a major selling point for the
distribution. At the moment,
Has anyone else tried NTeX at all? I have that installed here; I
chose it because it comes with more documentation than teTeX did. The
installer is Debian compatible; it even provides the right packages
for things that depend on them.
AFAIR Debian came with NTeX before. I seem to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Phillips) writes:
I think it is in Debian's interest to think carefully about how to get
the best possible TeX distribution. I think for a lot of people, having
a great TeX distribution would be a major selling point for the
I notice there are several teTeX packages available. Have many people
tried them? Are there any problems with the packages or are they
stable enough for me to install them and be confident things are
going to work properly?
Is the teTeX distribution complete, or is it missing a few things?
On Thu, 17 Apr 1997, Mark Phillips wrote:
I notice there are several teTeX packages available. Have many people
tried them? Are there any problems with the packages or are they
stable enough for me to install them and be confident things are
going to work properly?
While installing it is a
On Apr 17, Mark Phillips wrote
I notice there are several teTeX packages available. Have many people
tried them? Are there any problems with the packages or are they
stable enough for me to install them and be confident things are
going to work properly?
Is the teTeX distribution
Andreas Tille writes:
On Thu, 17 Apr 1997, Mark Phillips wrote:
I notice there are several teTeX packages available. Have many people
tried them? Are there any problems with the packages or are they
stable enough for me to install them and be confident things are
going to work
On Apr 17, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote
Has anyone else tried NTeX at all? I have that installed here; I
chose it because it comes with more documentation than teTeX did. The
installer is Debian compatible; it even provides the right packages
for things that depend on them.
AFAIR Debian came
On Thu, 17 Apr 1997, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
Has anyone else tried NTeX at all? I have that installed here; I
chose it because it comes with more documentation than teTeX did. The
installer is Debian compatible; it even provides the right packages
for things that depend on them.
I'm a
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) writes:
Anyway there should be sufficient documentation about LaTeX across
the net. I just re-read the german lkurz alias LaTeX2e-Kurzbeschreibung.
I'm sure that a similiar english document does exist, too.
Actually
14 matches
Mail list logo
