On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 03:17:46PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Op 12-01-2023 om 22:40 schreef Geert Stappers:
> > Van de
> > > > Wat is zoal jullie favoriete tool om "dotfiles" te beheren?
> > is de bedoeling om wat tips te krijgen hoe met "dotfi
Op 12-01-2023 om 22:40 schreef Geert Stappers:
Van de
Wat is zoal jullie favoriete tool om "dotfiles" te beheren?
is de bedoeling om wat tips te krijgen hoe met "dotfiles" om te gaan.
Lang en eigenlijk nog steeds beschouw ik dotfiles als een kussen om
op te zitten. Ik wil
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:53:58AM +0100, Gijs Hillenius wrote:
> On 9 January 2023 21:34 Geert Stappers, wrote:
>
> > Hoi,
> >
> >
> > Wat is zoal jullie favoriete tool om "dotfiles" te beheren?
> >
> >
> > Groeten
> > Geert Sta
On 9 January 2023 21:34 Geert Stappers, wrote:
> Hoi,
>
>
> Wat is zoal jullie favoriete tool om "dotfiles" te beheren?
>
>
> Groeten
> Geert Stappers
>
>
> |$ apt search dotfiles
> |Bezig met sorteren... Klaar
> |Volledige tekst doorzoeken... Kla
Hoi,
Wat is zoal jullie favoriete tool om "dotfiles" te beheren?
Groeten
Geert Stappers
|$ apt search dotfiles
|Bezig met sorteren... Klaar
|Volledige tekst doorzoeken... Klaar
|homesick/testing 1.1.6-3 all
| keep your dotfiles (configs) in git
|
|rcm/testing 1.3.4-1 all
| tool
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 03:12:40 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 01:08:05AM +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:06:17 -0500, Yaro Yaro wrote:
Package managers don't track .dotfiles.
No, they don't. That, of course, is part of the problem.
Ummm
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 23:55:38 +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
Slavko li...@slavino.sk wrote:
Dňa 02.07.2013 23:32 John Hasler wrote / napísal(a):
Look at the access times. Dotfiles that have not been accessed in
years can probably be safely removed.
Sure, but do not forget, that the relatime
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 23:20:31 -0400, shawn wilson wrote:
The point about mentioning browsers is that you don't generally look
there.
The other point about browsers is that when I look at my home directory
with firefox, the dotfiles take up most of the visual space.
-- hendrik
On 2013-07-03 00:43:39 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:02:08 -0400, shawn wilson wrote:
Y'all are really taking all of the fun out of this.
Here's the point - this is an exercise. There is no good reason to do
this. What, you've got a 10 meg disk that is at 95%? Well,
Slavko li...@slavino.sk wrote:
Dňa 02.07.2013 23:32 John Hasler wrote / napísal(a):
Look at the access times. Dotfiles that have not been accessed in years
can probably be safely removed.
Sure, but do not forget, that the relatime (default one) and noatime
mount options are going into play
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 01:08:05AM +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:06:17 -0500, Yaro Yaro wrote:
Package managers don't track .dotfiles.
No, they don't. That, of course, is part of the problem.
Ummm, no it isn't. It is a serious bug if any package interferes with
files
Dňa 02.07.2013 23:32 John Hasler wrote / napísal(a):
Look at the access times. dotfiles that have not been accessed in years
can probably be safely removed.
Sure, but do not forget, that the relatime (default one) and noatime
mount options are going into play, then the results can
There are lots of .dotfiles cluttering my home directory.
No doubt some of them are useful.
Many, though, are probably remnants of packages of years past -- packages
I installed long ago, no longer need, and have removed.
Is there any way of identifying which packages are using which dotfiles
Package managers don't track .dotfiles. Those are created at runtime by
your software.
On Jul 2, 2013 3:49 PM, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
There are lots of .dotfiles cluttering my home directory.
No doubt some of them are useful.
Many, though, are probably remnants
On Tuesday 02 July 2013 22:06:17 Yaro Yaro wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013 3:49 PM, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
There are lots of .dotfiles cluttering my home directory.
No doubt some of them are useful.
Many, though, are probably remnants of packages of years past -- packages
I
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
There are lots of .dotfiles cluttering my home directory.
No doubt some of them are useful.
Many, though, are probably remnants of packages of years past -- packages
I installed long ago, no longer need, and have
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 02 July 2013 22:06:17 Yaro Yaro wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013 3:49 PM, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
There are lots of .dotfiles cluttering my home directory.
No doubt some of them are useful.
Many
Look at the access times. dotfiles that have not been accessed in years
can probably be safely removed.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
And which ones are obsolete -- the user equivalent of configuration
files, which are properly tracked by the package manager?
The violence
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:28 AM, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 02 July 2013 22:06:17 Yaro Yaro wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013 3:49 PM, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
There are lots of .dotfiles
...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 02 July 2013 22:06:17 Yaro Yaro wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013 3:49 PM, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
There are lots of .dotfiles cluttering my home directory.
No doubt some
2013 22:06:17 Yaro Yaro wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013 3:49 PM, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com
wrote:
There are lots of .dotfiles cluttering my home directory.
No doubt some of them are useful.
Many, though, are probably remnants of packages of years past --
packages
I
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:02:08 -0400, shawn wilson wrote:
Y'all are really taking all of the fun out of this.
Here's the point - this is an exercise. There is no good reason to do
this. What, you've got a 10 meg disk that is at 95%? Well, if you pay
shipping, I've got a extra 40 meg that I
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:06:17 -0500, Yaro Yaro wrote:
Package managers don't track .dotfiles.
No, they don't. That, of course, is part of the problem.
But it would be useful if packages were to have a standard format for
declaring what dotfiles the package is in charge of. Much like the way
want it again).
So, yep, I've got more dotfiles than regular files in my home
directory, but somehow I fail to care.
% find ~/ -maxdepth 1 -iname [a-z0-9]* | wc -l
50
% find ~/ -maxdepth 1 -iname .* | wc -l
77
But if someone can tell me where those 50 files and directories I look
at all the time
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 07:27:06AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
What file can one put unalias ls, or anything in fact, in for it to
get read on the remote system upon interactive ssh? .bashrc,
.bash_profile are apparently not read.
On mine it executes .bash_profile (normal login shell).
What file can one put unalias ls, or anything in fact, in for it to
get read on the remote system upon interactive ssh? .bashrc,
.bash_profile are apparently not read.
At most I can do now is
$ ssh porky.simonds.net
porky$ unalias ls
I don't want the dotfile read on batch jobs preferably.
--
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 12:51:32PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
You can try Coda filesystem; http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu.
It seems a lot of people are thinking about sharing .dot files this week.
I asked this same sort of question on the NYLUG list and someone said
Coda was seriously unfinished and
This seems like a common enough problem that anybody sufficiently
geeky (say, who has a Debian machine at home and some Unixy machine
at work/school) would have run into it. Are there any pre-canned,
or at least not-too-groady home-baked solutions out there?
How about: run an rsync
David Z Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have about four completely different login accounts that I use
regularly. They may as well be in separate universes; one is on my
laptop, for example, while another will let me log in on most of the
machines on the main MIT campus (with a fairly
that
people who aren't me shouldn't be able to modify the dotfiles.)
TIA...
--
David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/
Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal.
-- Abra Mitchell
about 35 debian systems, 4 of which i use heavily
daily(the rest are mostly dedicated servers). and i run
another 20 sun sparc solaris systems/ibm aix/tru64 etc.
maybe im not geeky enough but my dotfiles are always empty.
about the only thing i keep in sync is my ~/.ssh/authorized_keys
file. i modify
have set it up, you can update the
local directories as usual, and when you get connected, the server will be
updated.
I have less control over my work
machine than I'd like. And, of course, it goes without saying that
people who aren't me shouldn't be able to modify the dotfiles.)
Hmm
El mié, 19 ago 1998, TooManySecrets escribió:
Buenas
¿Para qué sirven exactamente las utilidades Dotfile que vienen en la nueva
Debian 2.0?
Es un programa para generar los tipicos ficheros de configuracion tipo
..bashrc .bash_profile, etc etc ...
esta sobre Xwindows.
Saludos. Antonio
On Wed, Aug 19, 1998 at 05:34:15PM +0200, TooManySecrets wrote:
Buenas
¿Para qué sirven exactamente las utilidades Dotfile que vienen en la nueva
Debian 2.0?
Según dice es una herramienta de configuración, con la cual configurar cosas
básicas y características exóticas de nuestros programas
Buenas
¿Para qué sirven exactamente las utilidades Dotfile que vienen en la nueva
Debian 2.0?
Según dice es una herramienta de configuración, con la cual configurar cosas
básicas y características exóticas de nuestros programas favoritos
(según dice la explicación + ó - del paquete).
¿Alguien
On Wed, Aug 19, 1998 at 05:34:15PM +0200, TooManySecrets wrote:
¿Para qué sirven exactamente las utilidades Dotfile que vienen en la nueva
Debian 2.0?
Es un programa en Tcl/Tk que con una interface grafica pasable te muestra
TODAS las opciones que tienes en un archivo de configuracion. Por eso
37 matches
Mail list logo
