Also sprach Hugh Saunders (Tue 05 Aug 02003 at 01:25:45AM +0100):
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:54:38PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
I don't think I want to do this ;
# sudo apt-get -u install apt=0.5.8
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:12:39PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Also sprach Colin Watson (Tue 05 Aug 02003 at 02:24:39AM +0100):
In your place, I would go for either stable plus backported bits and
pieces or unstable, depending on the application. I think running mixed
systems is
Hi!
Sometimes when there is a new version (not upstream version, internal debian
version only) i would like to know about the changes.
Is there any other way to view debian/changelog than to download the source
package?
Regards
Henning
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:00:48PM +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
Sometimes when there is a new version (not upstream version, internal
debian version only) i would like to know about the changes.
Is there any other way to view debian/changelog than to download the
source package?
Have you
Also sprach Colin Watson (Mon 04 Aug 02003 at 03:16:03PM +0100):
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:00:48PM +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
Sometimes when there is a new version (not upstream version, internal
debian version only) i would like to know about the changes.
Is there any other way to view
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:57:39AM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Also sprach Colin Watson (Mon 04 Aug 02003 at 03:16:03PM +0100):
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:00:48PM +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
Sometimes when there is a new version (not upstream version, internal
debian version only) i
Also sprach Colin Watson (Mon 04 Aug 02003 at 06:19:34PM +0100):
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:57:39AM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Also sprach Colin Watson (Mon 04 Aug 02003 at 03:16:03PM +0100):
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:00:48PM +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
Sometimes when there is a
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:06:13PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Also sprach Colin Watson (Mon 04 Aug 02003 at 06:19:34PM +0100):
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:57:39AM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Worse, installing apt-listchanges depends on python-apt, which -- in
turn -- depends on
Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Yes, I have a mixed system, preferring to stay with stable; but, I need
certain packages from testing and unstable . . .
However, it is python-apt that has the problem with the non-existent
libapt packages.
Nevertheless, I have stable, testing and unstable in
Also sprach Colin Watson (Mon 04 Aug 02003 at 09:03:03PM +0100):
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:06:13PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Also sprach Colin Watson (Mon 04 Aug 02003 at 06:19:34PM +0100):
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:57:39AM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Worse, installing
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:54:38 -0500
Michael D. Schleif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ much snipping ]
I do not want to do without apt-utils, aptitude, and synaptic . . .
What else am I missing?
Upgrading those to unstable as well?
-c
--
Chris Metzler [EMAIL
Also sprach Chris Metzler (Mon 04 Aug 02003 at 06:05:25PM -0400):
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:54:38 -0500
Michael D. Schleif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ much snipping ]
I do not want to do without apt-utils, aptitude, and synaptic . . .
What else am I missing?
Upgrading
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:54:38PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
I don't think I want to do this ;
# sudo apt-get -u install apt=0.5.8
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
apt-utils aptitude synaptic
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:12:39PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
And, this is *NOT* valid:
deb http://security.debian.org unstable/updates contrib main non-free
Please, correct my misunderstandings, Colin; but, what I understand from
your message above is that, regardless of an
Also sprach Colin Watson (Tue 05 Aug 02003 at 02:24:39AM +0100):
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:08:01PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Also sprach Hugh Saunders (Tue 05 Aug 02003 at 01:25:45AM +0100):
erm, why not just run unstable?? mixed stable/testing/unstable looks
like a mess to me and
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:08:01PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Also sprach Hugh Saunders (Tue 05 Aug 02003 at 01:25:45AM +0100):
erm, why not just run unstable?? mixed stable/testing/unstable looks
like a mess to me and probably doesnt help with getting security fixes
for stuff either.
16 matches
Mail list logo
