Re: Email sender refusing to send to unknown ca

On Fri, 2 Jun 2023, Tim Woodall wrote: On Fri, 2 Jun 2023, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 2:20?PM Tim Woodall wrote: Anyone come across delivery failures where the client cert is signed by an internal ca. Are you sure it's not a self-signed end-entity certificate used in an

Re: Email sender refusing to send to unknown ca

On Fri, 2 Jun 2023, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 2:20?PM Tim Woodall wrote: Anyone come across delivery failures where the client cert is signed by an internal ca. Are you sure it's not a self-signed end-entity certificate used in an Opportunistic Encryption scheme?

Re: Email sender refusing to send to unknown ca

On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 2:20 PM Tim Woodall wrote: > > Anyone come across delivery failures where the client cert is signed by > an internal ca. Are you sure it's not a self-signed end-entity certificate used in an Opportunistic Encryption scheme?

Email sender refusing to send to unknown ca

Hi, Anyone come across delivery failures where the client cert is signed by an internal ca. Jun 2 03:45:27 imap202 sm-mta[14736]: STARTTLS=server, error: accept failed=-1, reason=tlsv1 alert unknown ca, SSL_error=1, errno=0, retry=-1, relay=mta140.fwdto.net [195.68.228.140] Jun 2 03:45:27